Advertisement

De-Bordering Justice in the Age of International Migrations: An Introduction

  • Juan Carlos VelascoEmail author
  • MariaCaterina La Barbera
Chapter
Part of the Studies in Global Justice book series (JUST, volume 18)

Abstract

This chapter introduces and discusses the concepts that are in-depth articulated in the volume. International migration is presented here as a test bench where the normative limits of institutional order, its contradictions and internal tensions are examined. Migrations allows to call into question classical political categories and models. Pointing at walls and fences as tools that reproduce enormous inequalities within the globalized neo-liberal system, this chapter presents the conceptual tensions and contradictions between migration policies and global justice. We challenge the conceptualization of justice as a relationship between citizens of the same country and the State and argue that, in our globalized world, nation-state cannot constitute the basic unit of the theories of justice. We argue that an integral approach that includes the complex and interconnected forms of structural inequalities and transcends the borders of national sovereign states is required. Avoiding the methodological nationalism and the exclusionary biases that inform current migration and border control policies, this chapter finally places attention on the most marginalized subjects of the migration chain: migrant women workers. We point out the importance of addressing transnational structural inequalities and bringing social reproduction to the center of global justice theories.

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work has been supported by the R&D grant “Human rights and global justice in the context of international migrations” (FFI2013-42521-P) funded by the Spanish Program for the Promotion of Scientific and Technical Research for Excellence. We especially thank Francisco Blanco and Astrid Wagner for their engagement and collaboration in this book project.

References

  1. Al Gore. 2007. Nobel Prize Acceptance Speech. https://web.archive.org/web/20101205052603/ http://blog.algore.com/2007/12/. Last accessed in June 2018.
  2. Andersson, Ruben. 2014. Illegality, Inc. Oakland: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bauböck, Rainer, Agnes Heller, and Aristide R. Zolberg, eds. 1996. The Challenge of Diversity: Integration and Pluralism in Societies of Immigration. Aldershot: Avebury.Google Scholar
  4. Bauman, Zygmunt. 2016. Strangers at Our Door. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  5. Beck, Ulrich. 2006. Cosmopolitan Vision. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  6. Benería, Lourdes, Carmen D. Deere, and Naila Kabeer. 2012. Gender and International Migration; Globalization, Development and Governance. Feminist Economics 18 (2): 1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bourguignon, François. 2015. The Globalization of Inequality. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cassee, Andreas. 2016. Migration. In Handbuch Gerechtigkeit, ed. A. Goppel et al., 423–428. Stuttgart: Metzler.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Castles, Stephen, and Mark J. Miller. 1993. The Age of Migration. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013.Google Scholar
  10. Celikates, Robin. 2016. Migration: Normative und sozialtheoretische Perspektiven. In Internationale Politische Theorie, ed. R. Kreide and A. Nederberger, 229–244. Stuttgart: Metzler.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chernilo, Daniel. 2007. A Social Theory of the Nation State: The Political Forms of Methodological Nationalism. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  12. Estévez, Ariadna. 2012. Human Rights, Migration, and Social Conflict. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fraser, Nancy. 2008. Scales of justice. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  14. García Añón, José, et al. 2013. Identificación policial por perfil étnico en España. Valencia: Tirant lo Blanch.Google Scholar
  15. Harvey, David. 2005. A Brief History of Neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Hochschild, Arlie. 2000. Global Care Chains and Emotional Surplus Value. In On The Edge: Living with Global Capitalism, ed. W. Hutton and A. Giddens, 130–146. London: Jonathan Cape.Google Scholar
  17. ILO, International Labour Organization. 2016. Migrant Domestic Workers. International Labour Office: Geneva, http://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/%2D%2D-ed_protect/%2D%2D-protrav/%2D%2D-migrant/documents/briefingnote/wcms_467720.pdf. Last accessed in Mar 2018.
  18. Jaggar, Alison. 2014. Gender and Global Justice. Oxford: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  19. Krastev, Ivan. 2017. Majoritarian Futures. In The Great Regression, ed. Heinrich Geiselberger, 65–77. London: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  20. La Barbera, MariaCaterina et al. 2016. Inventory of Visa Policies and Agreements: Italy, Spain, France, and the United Kingdom, http://www.temperproject.eu/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/Working-Paper-6.pdf
  21. Massey, Douglas S. 2012. Towards an Integrated Model of International Migration. Eastern Journal of European Studies 3 (2): 9–35.Google Scholar
  22. Mezzadra, Sandro and Brett Neilson. 2013. Border as method, or, the multiplication of labor. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Milanovic, Branko. 2016. Global Inequality. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Miller, David. 2016. Strangers in Our Midst. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Naïr, Sami. 2010. La Europa mestiza. Inmigración, ciudadanía, codesarrollo. Barcelona: Galaxia Gutenberg.Google Scholar
  26. Nussbaum, Martha C. 2007. Frontiers of justice. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  27. O’Neill, Onora. 2016. Justice Across Boundaries. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. OECD, Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. 2015. In It Together: Why Less Inequality Benefits All. Overview of Inequality Trends, Key Findings and Policy Directions. París: OCDE.  https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264235120-en.
  29. Oltmer, Jochen. 2012. Globale Migration. Geschichte und Gegenwart. Munich: C.H. Beck.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Piketty, Thomas. 2014. Capital in the Twenty-First Century. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ravenstein, Ernest-George. 1885. The Laws of Migration. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 48 (2): 167–227.Google Scholar
  32. ———. 1889. The Laws of Migration. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 52 (2): 241–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Rodier, Claire. 2012. El Xénophobie Business. Paris: La Découverte.Google Scholar
  34. Ruhs, Martin, and Bridget Anderson. 2012. Who Needs Migrant Workers? Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Sager, Alex. 2016. Methodological Nationalism, Migration and Political Theory. Political Studies 64 (1): 42–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Sassen, Saskia. 1999. Guests and Aliens. New York: New Press.Google Scholar
  37. ———. 2000. Women’s Burden. Journal of International Affairs 53 (2): 503–524.Google Scholar
  38. ———. 2006. In Territory, Authority, Rights, ed. Princeton UP. Princeton.Google Scholar
  39. ———. 2015. From National Borders to Embedded Borderings. In Rethinking Border Control for a Globalizing World, ed. L. Weber, 179–189. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  40. Shachar, Ayalet. 2009. The Birthright Lottery. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Singer, Peter. 2002. One World. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  42. UN-DESA, United Nation Department of Economic and Social Affairs. 2017. International Migration Report 2017. New York: United Nations. http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/migration/publications/migrationreport/docs/MigrationReport2017.pdf. Last accessed in 17 Jan 2018.
  43. UNDP, United Nation Development Programme. 2009. Human Development Report 2009: Overcoming Barriers: Human Mobility and Development. New York: United Nations. http://hdr.undp.org/sites/default/files/reports/269/hdr_2009_en_complete.pdf. Last accessed in Nov 2017.
  44. Velasco, Juan Carlos. 2013. Beyond the Borders. In Spheres of Global Justice, ed. J.-Ch. Merle, L. Foisneau, Ch. Hiebaum, and J.C. Velasco, vol. 1, 293–306. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. ———. 2016. El azar de las fronteras. México: FCE.Google Scholar
  46. Wellman, Christopher H. 2015. Immigration. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2015 Edition), ed. Edward N. Zalta, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2015/entries/immigration/
  47. Wellman, Christopher H., and Phillip Cole. 2011. Debating the Ethics of Immigration. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Wilcox, Shelley. 2015. Immigration and Borders. In Bloomsbury Companion to Political Philosophy, ed. Andrew Fiala, 183–197. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  49. Young, Iris Marion. 2011. Responsibility for Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Ypi, Lea. 2008. Justice in Migration: A Closed Borders Utopia? The Journal of Political Philosophy 16 (4): 391–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Juan Carlos Velasco
    • 1
    Email author
  • MariaCaterina La Barbera
    • 2
  1. 1.Institute of Philosophy, Spanish National Research Council (CSIC)MadridSpain
  2. 2.Faculty of Social SciencesNebrija UniversityMadridSpain

Personalised recommendations