Advertisement

Perspective Taking vs Mental Rotation: CSP-Based Single-Trial Analysis for Cognitive Process Disambiguation

  • Christoforos Christoforou
  • Adamantini Hatzipanayioti
  • Marios Avraamides
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11309)

Abstract

Mental Rotation (i.e. the ability to mentally rotate representations of 2D and 3D objects) and egocentric Perspective Taking (i.e. the ability to adopt an imagined spatial perspective) represent the two most well-known and used types of spatial transformation. Yet, these two spatial transformations are conceptually, visually, and mathematically equivalent. Thus, an active debate in the field is whether these two types of spatial transformations are cognitively and neurally distinct or whether they represent different manifestation of the same underlying core mental process. In this study, we utilize a machine learning approach to extract neural activity from electroencephalography (EEG) measures and identify neural differences between mental rotation and perspective taking tasks. Our results provide novel empirical evidence in support of the view that these two types of spatial transformation correspond to district cognitive processes at the neural level. Importantly, the proposed framework provides a novel approach that can facilitate the study of the neural correlates of spatial cognition.

Keywords

EEG Single-trial Machine learning Spatial cognition 

References

  1. 1.
    Blankertz, B., Tomioka, R., Lemm, S., Kawanabe, M., Muller, K.R.: Optimizing spatial filters for robust EEG single-trial analysis. IEEE Signal Process. Mag. 25(1), 41–56 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Christoforou, C., Constantinidou, F., Shoshilou, P., Simos, P.: Single-trial linear correlation analysis: application to characterization of stimulus modality effects. Frontiers Comput. Neurosci. 7, 15 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Christoforou, C., Mavridis, N., Machado, E.L., Spanoudis, G.: Android tele-operation through brain-computer interfacing: a real-world demo with non-expert users. In: IRIS2010, Nagoya, Japan, pp. 294–299 (2010)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Christoforou, C., Papadopoulos, T.C., Constantinidou, F., Theodorou, M.: Your brain on the movies: a computational approach for predicting box-office performance from viewer’s brain responses to movie trailers. Frontiers Neuroinform. 11, 72 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Keehner, M., Guerin, S.A., Miller, M.B., Turk, D.J., Hegarty, M.: Modulation of neural activity by angle rotation during imagined spatial transformations. Neuroimage. 33, 391–398 (2006).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.06.043CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kozhevnikov, M., Motes, M., Rasch, B., Blajenkova, O.: Perspective-taking vs. mental rotation transformations and how they predict spatial navigation performance. Appl. Cogn. Psychol. 20, 397–417 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Parra, L., Spence, C., Gerson, A., Sajda, P.: Recipes for the linear analysis of EEG. Neuroimage 28(2), 326–41 (2005).  https://doi.org/10.1109/MSP.2008.4408441CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Philiastides, M.G., Sajda, P.: Temporal characterization of the neural correlates of perceptual decision making in the human brain. Cereb. Cortex 16, 509–518 (2005).  https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhi130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wai, J., Lubinski, D., Benbow, C.: Spatial ability for stem domains: aligning over fifty years of cumulative psychological knowledge solidifies its importance. J. Educ. Psychol. 101, 817–835 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wraga, M., Shephard, J., Church, J., Inati, S., Kosslyn, S.: Imagined rotations of self versus objects: an fMRI study. Neuropsychologia 43(5), 1351–61 (2005).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2004.11.028CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Zacks, J.M., Vettel, J.M., Michelon, P.: Imagined viewer and object rotations dissociated with event-related fMRI. J. Cognit. Neurosci. 15, 1002–1018 (2003).  https://doi.org/10.1162/089892903770007399CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christoforos Christoforou
    • 1
    • 2
  • Adamantini Hatzipanayioti
    • 3
  • Marios Avraamides
    • 4
    • 5
  1. 1.Division of Computer Science, Mathematics and ScienceSt. John’s UniversityNew YorkUSA
  2. 2.Division of Research and DevelopmentR.K.I Leaders Ltd.LarnacaCyprus
  3. 3.Max-Planck-Institute for Biological CyberneticsTuebingenGermany
  4. 4.Department of PsychologyUniversity of CyprusNicosiaCyprus
  5. 5.Research Centre on Interactive Media, Smart Systems, and Emerging Technologies - RISENicosiaCyprus

Personalised recommendations