Advertisement

How to Govern VSE Teams: Experiences Through a Model and Case Study

  • René Arévalo
  • Carlos MontenegroEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 895)

Abstract

The software development organizations need an understanding of the governance process and their practical approach to reach their strategic goals, a subject where there is a research opportunity. This study proposes a model type artifact to govern Very Small Entities (VSE) Teams for Software Development. The model design is based on COBIT 5 and IT governance best practices, with structural and dynamic governance components. The validation is done through the model application, in a case study, in a Public Sector Organization, using a SCRUM software process. The model application allows the appropriate responses to the software development needs and facilitate the solution of the problems in the project development. Besides, a survey shows that in a developing country, the model applicability can be generalizable. Thus, the study tests a tool for the practitioners and academics and contributes to the growth of the current knowledge concerning the Software Development Governance.

Keywords

Software Development Governance VSE COBIT DSR SCRUM 

References

  1. 1.
    Webb, P., Pollard, C., Ridley, G.: Attempting to define IT governance wisdom or folly?. In: 39th International Conference on System Sciences, Hawaii (2006)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Van Grembergen, W., De Haes, S.: Enterprise Governance of Information Technology. Springer, New York (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-84882-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Almeida, R., Pereira, R., Mira da Silva, M.: IT governance mechanisms: a literature review. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference IESS, Porto, Portugal, 7–8 February 2013Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Castro, M., Hernandes, C.: A metric of software size as a tool for IT governance. In: Proceedings of 27th Brazilian Symposium on Software Engineering, SBES 2013 (2013)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dubinsky, Y., Ravid, S., Rafaeli, A., Bar-Nahor, R.: Governance mechanisms in global development environments. In: Sixth IEEE International Conference on Global Software Engineering (2011)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    ISACA: COBIT 5.0. A business framework for governance and management of IT (2012)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chulani, S., Williams, C., Yaeli, A.: Software development governance and its concerns. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Software Development Governance (2008)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sommer, A., Dukovska-Popovska, I., Steger-Jensen, K.: Agile product development governance – on governing the emerging scrum/stage-gate hybrids. In: Grabot, B., et al. (Eds.): APMS 2014, Part I, IFIP AICT (2014)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Talby, D., Dubinsky, Y.: Governance of an agile software project. In: SDG 2009, Vancouver, Canada (2009)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    O’Connor, R.V., Laporte, C.Y.: Software project management in very small entities with ISO/IEC 29110. In: Winkler, D., O’Connor, Rory V., Messnarz, R. (eds.) EuroSPI 2012. CCIS, vol. 301, pp. 330–341. Springer, Heidelberg (2012).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31199-4_29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sánchez-Gordón, M.-L., Colomo-Palacios, R., de Amescua Seco, A., O’Connor, R.V.: The route to software process improvement in small- and medium-sized enterprises. Managing Software Process Evolution, pp. 109–136. Springer, Cham (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31545-4_7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Maglyas, A., Nikula, U., Smolander, K.: Comparison of software product management practices in SMEs and large enterprises. In: Cusumano, M.A., Iyer, B., Venkatraman, N. (eds.) ICSOB 2012. LNBIP, vol. 114, pp. 15–26. Springer, Heidelberg (2012).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-30746-1_2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Van Wyk, L., Marnewick, C.: Applying governance principles to improve agile project success. In: International Association for Management of Technology IAMOT 2016 (2016)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Er, N., Erbaş, C., Ervaş, B.: Software development governance: a case study for tools integration. In: Modern Software Engineering Concepts and Practices: Advanced Approaches, Information Science Reference, pp. 315–332 (2011)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bannerman, P.: Software development governance: a meta-management perspective. In SDG 2009, Vancouver, Canada (2009)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hevner, A., Ram, S., March, S., Park, J.: Design science in information systems research. MIS Q. 28(1), 75–105 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hevner, A., Chatterjee, S.: Design Research in Information Systems. Springer Publishing, New York (2010).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-5653-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Helfert, M., Donnellan, B. (eds.): EDSS 2011. CCIS, vol. 286. Springer, Heidelberg (2012).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33681-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Peffers, K., Rothenberger, M., Kuechler, B. (eds.): DESRIST 2012. LNCS, vol. 7286. Springer, Heidelberg (2012).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29863-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Tremblay, M.C., VanderMeer, D., Rothenberger, M., Gupta, A., Yoon, V. (eds.): DESRIST 2014. LNCS, vol. 8463. Springer, Cham (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06701-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Given, L. (ed.): SAGE: The SAGE Encyclopedia of Qualitative Research Methods. SAGE Publications, Los Angeles (2008)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Mason, J.: Qualitative Researching. SAGE Publications, London (2002)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    De Haes, S., Van Grembergen, W.: Information Technology Governance: Models, Practices, and Cases. IGI Publishing, Hershey (2008)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    ISACA: COBIT 5: Enabling Processes (2012)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Noll, J., Beecham, S., Richardson, I., Canna, C.: A global teaming model for global software development governance: a case study. In: IEEE 11th International Conference on Global Software Engineering (2016)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kofman, A., Yaeli, A., Klinger, T., Tarr, P.: Roles, rights, and responsibilities: better governance through decision rights automation. In: SDG 2009 (2009)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    ISO IEC: ISO/IEC TR 29110-1 Systems and software engineering—Lifecycle profiles for Very Small Entities (VSEs) (2016)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    SCRUMstudy™: A Guide to the Scrum Body of Knowledge (SBOK™ Guide), VMEdu, Inc. (2016)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    SNAP-Ecuador: Subsecretaría de Gobierno Electrónico. http://www.administracionpublica.gob.ec/subsecretaria-de-gobierno-electronico/#. Accessed 2017
  30. 30.
    AESOFT-Ecuador: AESOFT. http://aesoft.com.ec/. Accessed 2017
  31. 31.
    Heal, R., Twycross, A.: Validity and reliability in quantitative research, Evid.-Based Nurs., 66–67 (2015)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Mangalaraj, G., Singh, A.: IT governance frameworks and COBIT - a literature review. In: Twentieth Americas Conference on Information Systems, Savannah (2014)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Bartens, Y., De Haes, S., Lamoen, Y., Schulte, F., Voss, S.: On the way to a minimum baseline in IT governance: using expert views for selective implementation of COBIT 5. In: 48th Hawaii International Conference on System Science (2015)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Universidad Politécnica SalesianaQuitoEcuador
  2. 2.Escuela Politécnica NacionalQuitoEcuador

Personalised recommendations