Advertisement

Sub-Federal State-Building and the Origins of Federalism: A Comparison of Austria, Germany and Switzerland

  • Gerhard LehmbruchEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Comparative Territorial Politics book series (COMPTPOL)

Abstract

This chapter accounts for federal institution-building based on the concept of sequencing. It argues that state-building processes on the level of constituent units that preceded nation-state formation encouraged a more functional rather than dual allocation of powers. Inspired by historical institutionalism, this long-term historical perspective illustrates diverging federal development paths between European federations (Germany, Austria and Switzerland) on the one hand and Anglo-Saxon settler societies (USA, Canada, Australia) on the other. Furthermore, the constituent units’ infrastructural capacities at the time of federalization shaped the historical development paths that Germany, Austria and Switzerland took and explain the considerable variation in autonomy of the constituent units. While Swiss Cantons dispose of high authority, Austrian Länder are much weaker and German Länder take on a middle position.

Keywords

Federalization Historical institutionalism Sequencing Institutional capacities Comparison 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This chapter is a revised and abbreviated version of a manuscript originally prepared for the 2nd ECPR General Conference, Marburg 18–21 September 2003. I am grateful to the editors for useful comments and suggestions and to Jörg Broschek for substantively updating and compiling the final version of this manuscript.

References

  1. Balthasar, A. (2003). Die Prämienverbilligung im Krankenversicherungsgesetz: Vollzugsföderalismus und sekundäre Harmonisierung. Schweizerische Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft, 9(1), 335–354.Google Scholar
  2. Battaglini, M., & Giraud, O. (2003). Policy Styles and the Swiss Executive Federalism: Comparing Diverging Styles of Cantonal Implementation of the Federal Law on Unemployment. Schweizerische Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft, 9(1), 285–308.Google Scholar
  3. Behnke, N., Benz, A. (2009). The Politics of Constitutional Change Between Reform and Evolution. Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 39(1), 213–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Benz, A. (2013). Dimensions and Dynamics of Federal Regimes. In A. Benz & J. Broschek (Eds.), Federal Dynamics. Continuity, Change & the Varieties of Federalism (pp. 70–90). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brunner, O. (1963). Land und Herrschaft: Grundfragen der territorialen Verfassungsgeschichte Österreichs im Mittelalter. 5. Auflage. Wien: Rudolf M. Rohrer Verlag.Google Scholar
  6. Broschek, J. (2012). Historical Institutionalism and the Varieties of Federalism in Germany and Canada. Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 42(4), 662–687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Broschek, J. (2013). Between Path Dependence and Gradual Change: Historical Institutionalism and the Study of Federal Dynamics. In A. Benz & J. Broschek (Eds.), Federal Dynamics. Continuity, Change & the Varieties of Federalism (pp. 93–116). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Broschek, J., Petersohn, B., & Toubeau, S. (2018). Territorial Politics and Institutional Change: A Comparative-Historical Analysis. Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 48(1), 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bußjäger, P. (2012). The Austrian Convention: The Failure of an Ambitious Reform. In A. Benz & F. Knüpling (Eds.), Changing Federal Constitutions: Lessons from International Comparison (pp. 97–117). Berlin: Barbara Budrich Publishers.Google Scholar
  10. Falleti, T., & Mahoney, J. (2015). The Comparative Sequential Method. In J. Mahoney & K. Thelen (Eds.), Advances in Comparative-Historical Analysis (pp. 211–239). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Germann, R., et al. (1979). Fédéralisme en action: l’aménagement du territoire: les mesures urgentes à Genève, en Valais et au Tessin. Saint-Saphorin: Georgi.Google Scholar
  12. Kissling-Näf, I., & Knoepfel, P. (1992). Politikverflechtung dank zentralstaatlichem Immobilismus? Handlungsspielräume kantonaler Vollzugspolitiken im schweizerischen politisch-administrativen System. In H. Abromeit & W. Pommerehne (Eds.), Staatstätigkeit in der Schweiz (pp. 43–69). Bern: Paul Haupt.Google Scholar
  13. Lehmbruch, G. (2002). Der unitarische Bundesstaat in Deutschland: Pfadabhängigkeit und Wandel. In A. Benz & G. Lehmbruch (Eds.), Föderalismus. Analysen in entwicklungsgeschichtlicher und vergleichender Perspektive (pp. 53–110). Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lehmbruch, G. (2015). Der Entwicklungspfad des deutschen Bundesstaats - Weichenstellungen und Krisen. In G. Ambrosius et al. (Eds.), Föderalismus in historisch vergleichender Perspektive: Band 2: Föderale Systeme: Kaiserreich – Donaumonarchie – Europäische Union (pp. 327–370). Baden-Baden: Nomos.Google Scholar
  15. McRae, K. (1964). Switzerland, Example of Cultural Coexistence. Toronto: Canadian Institute of International Affairs.Google Scholar
  16. Pierson, P. (2004). Politics in Time: History, Institution, and Social Analysis. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Poirier, J., & Saunders, C. (2015). Comparative Experience of Intergovernmental Relations in Federal Systems. In J. Poirier, et al. (Eds.), Intergovernmental Relations in Federal Systems: Comparative Structures and Dynamics (pp. 440–498). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Stepan, A. (1999). Federalism and Democracy: Beyond the U.S. Model. Journal of Democracy, 10(4), 19–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Thorlakson, L. (2003). Comparing Federal Institutions: Power and Representation in Six Federations. West European Politics, 26(2), 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Wielinger, XYZ. (1991). Verwaltung. In H. Dachs, et al. (Eds.), Handbuch des politischen Systems Österreichs (pp. 765–773). Wien: Manz.Google Scholar
  21. Ziblatt, D. (2006). Structuring the State: The Formation of Italy and Germany and the Puzzle of Federalism. Princeton: Prineton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of KonstanzKonstanzGermany

Personalised recommendations