Advertisement

Pricing Private LTE and 5G Radio Licenses on 3.5 GHz

  • Heikki KokkinenEmail author
  • Seppo Yrjölä
  • Jan Engelberg
  • Topias Kokkinen
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering book series (LNICST, volume 261)

Abstract

The interest in private LTE and private 5G radio licenses is increasing along the IMT frequency bands, higher frequencies, new spectrum assignments, and demand for wireless industrial communication. This paper studies the private LTE and 5G license pricing using Finland as an example. The methods for pricing are the actual block license-based frequency fee pricing, Administrative Incentive Pricing (AIP), device based Private Mobile Radio pricing, and the device-based pricing of the Netherlands. The study shows that the selection of the pricing mechanism greatly impacts the license prices. Spectrum policy and regulation can be the trigger for novel private network ecosystem creation through creation of simple authorization processes to reduce the cost and minimize the complexity of use of spectrum for private LTE. In particular, provision of clear rules and guidance for spectrum valuation and pricing for the national regulator itself, as well as for the stakeholders wanting to supply and operate private LTE was found essential in reducing the cost and minimizing the complexity of private LTE spectrum use.

Keywords

Mobile communication market Private networks Spectrum pricing Spectrum sharing Regulation 5G 

References

  1. 1.
    3GPP: Specification #36.101. Evolved Universal Terrestrial Radio Access (E-UTRA); User Equipment (UE) radio transmission and reception. Release 8 (2007)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    3GPP: Specification #36.101. Evolved Universal Terrestrial Radio Access (E-UTRA); User Equipment (UE) radio transmission and reception. Release 15 (2017)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    European Commission: Opinion on spectrum related aspects for next-generation wireless systems (5G) (2016)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    GSMA: Mobile Policy Handbook (2018)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Marks, P., Pearson, K., Williamson, B., Hansell, P., Burns, J.: Estimating the commercial trading value of spectrum. Report for Ofcom. Plum Consulting (2009)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    MulteFire alliance. http://www.multefire.org/. Accessed 18 Apr 2018
  7. 7.
    Yrjölä, S., Kokkinen, H.: Licensed shared access evolution enables early access to 5G spectrum and novel use cases. EAI Endorsed Trans. Wirel. Spectr. 17(12), e1 (2017)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    FCC: 16-55 (2016) The Second Report and Order and Order on Reconsideration finalizes rules for innovative Citizens Broadband Radio Service in the 3.5 GHz Band (2016)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    3GPP: Study on management and orchestration of network slicing for next generation network. 3GPP TR 28.801 version 1.1.0. 3rd Generation Partnership Project (2017)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    5GPPP: 5G empowering vertical industries: Roadmap paper. The 5G Infrastructure Public Private Partnership, Brussels, February 2016Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Act 917/2014 288: Market-based spectrum fee. https://www.finlex.fi/en/laki/kaannokset/2014/en20140917.pdf
  12. 12.
    Ministry of Transport and Communications Finland: Survey of Spectrum Fee Practices in Selected EU Countries (2009). http://julkaisut.valtioneuvosto.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/78247/Julkaisuja_35-2009.pdf?sequence=1. Accessed 18 Apr 2018
  13. 13.
    Tonmukayakul, A., Weiss, M.B.: A study of secondary spectrum use using agent-based computational economics. Netnomics 9(2), 125–151 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ahmed, A.A.W., Markendahl, J., Ghanbari, A.: Evaluation of spectrum access options for indoor mobile network deployment. In: Proceedings of 24th International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications (PIMRC Workshops), London, pp. 138–142 (2013)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bazelon, C., McHenry, G.: Spectrum value. Telecommun. Policy 37, 737–747 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mölleryd, B.G., Markendahl, J., Mäkitalo, Ö., Werding, J.: Mobile broadband expansion calls for more spectrum or base stations-analysis of the value of spectrum and the role of spectrum aggregation. In: Proceedings of 21st European Regional ITS Conference, Copenhagen, Denmark (2010)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kokkinen, T., Kokkinen, H., Yrjölä, S.: Spectrum broker service for micro-operator and CBRS priority access licenses. In: Marques, P., Radwan, A., Mumtaz, S., Noguet, D., Rodriguez, J., Gundlach, M. (eds.) CrownCom 2017. LNICST, vol. 228, pp. 237–246. Springer, Cham (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76207-4_20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    European Commission: 5G for Europe: An Action Plan. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. COM (2016)588, Brussels (2016)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Radio Communications Agency Netherlands: Internetverbinding verbeteren. https://www.agentschaptelecom.nl/onderwerpen/internetverbinding-verbeteren. Accessed 18 Apr 2018
  20. 20.
    Ministry of Economic Affairs and Climate Policy Netherlands: Regeling vergoedingen Agentschap Telecom 2018 (2017). http://wetten.overheid.nl/BWBR0040138/2018-01-01. Accessed 18 Apr 2018
  21. 21.
    Bundesministerium für Verkehr und digitale Infrastruktur: 5G Strategy for Germany. https://www.bmvi.de/SharedDocs/DE/Publikationen/DG/098-dobrindt-5g-strategie.pdf?__blob=publicationFile. Accessed 18 Apr 2018
  22. 22.
    ComReg Document 16/71. 3.6 GHz Band Spectrum Award, Information Memorandum, 24 August 2016Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Cave, M., Nicholls, R.: The use of spectrum auctions to attain multiple objectives: policy implications. Telecommun. Policy 41(5–6), 367–378 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Finnish Ministry of Transport and Communications: Act 1028/2017. Liikenne- ja viestintäministeriön asetus hallinnollisista taajuusmaksuista ja Viestintäviraston taajuushallinnollisista suoritteista perittävistä muista maksuista. https://www.finlex.fi/fi/laki/alkup/2017/20171028. Accessed 18 Apr 2018
  25. 25.
    Finnish Ministry of Transport and Communications: Decree of the Ministry of Transport and Communications on the Frequency Fees and Other Fees the Finnish Communications Regulatory Authority Collects for Radio Administrative Services 1222/2010Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Plum consulting. Access to spectrum and valuation of spectrum for private LTE, April 2018Google Scholar

Copyright information

© ICST Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Heikki Kokkinen
    • 1
    Email author
  • Seppo Yrjölä
    • 2
  • Jan Engelberg
    • 3
  • Topias Kokkinen
    • 1
  1. 1.Fairspectrum OyEspooFinland
  2. 2.NokiaOuluFinland
  3. 3.Finnish Communications Regulatory AuthorityHelsinkiFinland

Personalised recommendations