Advertisement

Protest Publics as Democratic Innovators in Authoritarian Environments

  • Artem UldanovEmail author
  • Tatiana Davtyan
  • Fedor Alekseenkov
Chapter
Part of the Societies and Political Orders in Transition book series (SOCPOT)

Abstract

This chapter aims to examine how mass protests affected processes of sociopolitical changes in Russia and China in the case of Hong Kong and Turkey. All three countries (with certain exceptions in the case of Hong Kong) are characterized as authoritarian states where blast of mass protests happened during the period 2011–2017. In each case, the situation with authoritarian rule has different aspects: Russia slowly moves from a democratic hybrid regime to authoritarianism since 2003 under control of President Vladimir Putin; In Turkey, Recep Tayyip Erdoğan is trying to unite the nation around his figure and changing political regime to achieve undisputed power; and Hong Kong was under British rule till 1999 and returned into China on a particular agreement that the political regime established during the “colonial” period, which will not be reduced to all-China conditions. Nevertheless, different pathways led to similar results—shrinking space for independent political institutions and violations of fundamental rights and freedoms are not tolerated by the part of society in all three countries. Without working mechanisms to launch policy change, citizens choose protests as a way to show authorities their disagreement and anger over the authoritarian manner of policy-making.

We argue that in these countries, activists and citizens were able to organize themselves around a discourse of policy change, to form a “protest public,” unsatisfied with the political regime; and then, due to the reaction of the state, to create alternative democratic practices in sociopolitical activity. With such a strategy, a “protest public” could be considered as an actor of change, whose role is to create democratic innovations to oppose strict and repressive policies maintained by the state.

Keywords

Russia Turkey Hong Kong Mass protests Public participation Authoritarian regimes Protest publics 

Notes

Funding

The chapter was prepared within the framework of the Academic Fund Program at the National Research University Higher School of Economics (HSE) in 2016–2017 (grant № 17-05-0018) and by the Russian Academic Excellence Project “5-100.”

References

  1. Acemoglu, D., & Ucer, M. (2015). The ups and downs of Turkish growth, 2002–2015: Political dynamics, the European Union and the institutional slide. NBER Working Paper No. 21608.Google Scholar
  2. Anufriev, A., & Zaytsev, D. (2016). “Protest Publics” in Egypt and Turkey from 2011 till present days: Assessment of impact on political changes. Comparative Politics (Russia), 2(23), 34–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Belyaeva, N., & Dzhibladze, A. (2014). “Public” as a “social actor” vs “public” as a “target audience”: Conceptual connection between “the public” and “civil society”. In E. Yasin (Ed.), XIV April international scientific conference on the problems of economic development and society (Vol. 2, pp. 377–389). Moscow: Publishing House of the Higher School of Economics.Google Scholar
  4. Freedom House. (2013). Freedom on the Net in Turkey. Retrived December 20, 2018, from https://freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-net/2013/turkey
  5. Incenoglu, I. (2014). The Gezi resistance and its aftermath: A radical democratic opportunity? Soundings, 57, 23–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Levada Center. (2015). Ноябрьские рейтинги одобрения и доверия. Retrieved December 20, 2018, from https://www.levada.ru/2015/11/25/noyabrskie-rejtingi-odobreniya-i-doveriya-3/
  7. The Economist Intelligence Unit. (2012). Democracy index 2012: Democracy is at a standstill. Retrieved December 21, 2018, from https://www.eiu.com/public/topical_report.aspx?campaignid=DemocracyIndex12
  8. Transformation Index. (2016). BTI 2016 regional report Middle East and North Africa. The Bertelsmann Stiftung. Retrived December 20, 2018, from https://www.btiproject.org/fileadmin/files/BTI/Downloads/Reports/2016/pdf_regional/BTI_2016_Regionalbericht_MENA.pdf
  9. Varol, O., Ferrara, E., Ogan, C. L., Menczer, F., & Flammini, A. (2014, June). Evolution of online user behavior during a social upheaval. In Proceedings of the 2014 ACM conference on Web science (pp. 81–90). ACM.Google Scholar
  10. Volkov, D. (2012). Putinism under siege: The protesters and the public. Journal of Democracy, 23, 55–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Uldanov, A. (2016). Protest public as a source of civic initiatives: On the example of mass protests in Russia 2011–2012. Право и политика, 3, 388–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Zhuravlev, O., et al. (2014). Индивидуализм и солидарность в новых российских гражданских движениях. The Journal of Social Policy Studies, 12(2), 185–200. Retrived December 20, 2018, from https://jsps.hse.ru/article/view/3384

Media and Web Resources

  1. BBC News. (2013). Turkey protests: Erdogan meets Gezi park activists. Retrieved September 20, 2017, from http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-22898228
  2. CNN. (2017). Three years after Umbrella Movement, Hong Kongers back on the streets. Retrieved November 11, 2017, from https://edition.cnn.com/2017/10/01/asia/hong-kong-protest-umbrella/index.html
  3. Freedom House. (2017). Freedom in the world report, 2017. Retrieved September 20, 2017, from https://freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-world/freedom-world-2017
  4. Open Democracy. (2013). Gezi spirit and forums. Retrieved September 20, 2017, from https://www.opendemocracy.net/%C4%B0rem-%C4%B0nceo%C4%9Flu/gezi-spirit-and-forums#_ftn7
  5. Posta. (2013). Yeni internet fenomeni Chappuling. Retrieved November 11, 2017, from http://www.posta.com.tr/turkiye/HaberDetay/Yeni-internet-fenomeni%2D%2DChapulling.htm?ArticleID=180614
  6. Quartz. (2014, October 1). Beijing has a harshly worded message for Hong Kong’s pro-democracy movement. Retrieved August 15, 2017, from https://qz.com/274141/beijing-just-sent-a-chilling-message-to-hong-kongs-umbrella-revolution/
  7. Reuters. (2013). Turkish PM Erdogan calls for end to protests as clashes flare. Retrieved September 20, 2017, from http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/06/01/us-turkey-protests-idUSBRE94U0J920130601
  8. Systemic Peace. (2017). Polity IV Individual Country Regime trends. Retrieved August 11, 2017, from http://www.systemicpeace.org/polity/polity4.htm
  9. The Economist Intelligence Unit. (2017). Democracy index. Retrieved August 11, 2017, from https://infographics.economist.com/2017/DemocracyIndex/
  10. The Guardian. (2014, September 29). Under the umbrellas: What do Hong Kong’s protesters want from China? Retrieved September 20, 2017, from https://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/sep/29/hong-kong-democracy-protests-china-umbrellas-police
  11. The Japan Times. (2014, April 4). As Hong Kong protests turn violent, rival camps square off in gritty Mong Kok neighborhood. Retrieved August 15, 2017, from https://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2014/10/04/asia-pacific/politics-diplomacy-asia-pacific/hong-kong-protests-turn-violent-rival-camps-square-gritty-mong-kok-neighborhood/#.W0XlvXbhBaR
  12. The New-York Times. (2011, December 6). Russia cracks down on antigovernment protests. Retrieved August 11, 2017, from https://www.nytimes.com/2011/12/07/world/europe/jailing-opposition-leaders-russia-moves-to-quell-election-protests.html?_r=1
  13. World Bank. (n.d.). World Bank indicators database. Retrieved August 11, 2017, from https://data.worldbank.org/indicator
  14. РИА новости. (2012). Акции протеста в России после выборов 4 декабря. Retrieved November 11, 2017, from https://ria.ru/spravka/20120505/641687472.html
  15. Лента. (2012, December 6). Анатомия слива протеста. Retrieved September 20, 2017, from https://lenta.ru/articles/2012/12/06/protest1/
  16. Новая Газета. (2011). События 5-6 декабря. Retrieved November 11, 2017, from http://www.novayagazeta.ru/politics/49879.html

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Artem Uldanov
    • 1
    Email author
  • Tatiana Davtyan
    • 1
  • Fedor Alekseenkov
    • 1
  1. 1.Public Policy DepartmentNational Research University Higher School of Economics (NRU-HSE)MoscowRussian Federation

Personalised recommendations