Advertisement

Literature Review

  • Ratna Tantra
Chapter

Abstract

Doing a literature review is an integral part of research and yet it can be a daunting process. In this chapter, I will give you practical guidelines on how to conduct an effective literature review. Overall, the process can be divided into five main steps:
  1. 1.

    Come up with a statement of purpose, to establish why you need to do the review in the first place.

     
  2. 2.

    Come up with key words, so that you can plug these into search engines or scientific databases, to identify relevant papers.

     
  3. 3.

    Manage your search (through the use of a suitable reference software) and order your papers. The reference software will help you keep track on what literature you have, as well as allow you to cite them with ease when you write papers.

     
  4. 4.

    Read the papers and extract the information that you want.

     
  5. 5.

    Adopt an effective way to absorb information from your reading material, such as the use of a spider diagram in order to condense the information. Such a diagram will enable you to see connections between ideas/sub-ideas from different papers more clearly.

     

Keywords

Literature Statement of purpose Patents Reference software Spider diagram 

References

  1. Aghaei Chadegani, A., Salehi, H., Md Yunus, M. M., Farhadi, H., Fooladi, M., Farhadi, M., et al. (2013). A comparison between two main academic literature collections: Web of science and Scopus databases. Asian Social Science, 9(5), 18–26.Google Scholar
  2. College Library Services CSN. (n.d.). Databases vs. Search Engines: What’s the Difference? Retrieved January 8, 2018 from https://www.csn.edu/sites/default/files/legacy/PDFFiles/Library/dbasesearch3.pdf.
  3. Durbin, C. G. (2009). How to read a scientific research paper. Respiratory Care, 54, 1366–1371.Google Scholar
  4. Espacenet - Home page. (n.d.). Retrieved March 19, 2018, from https://worldwide.espacenet.com/.
  5. European Patent Office, & European Commission. (2007). Why researchers should care about patents. European Commission, (pp. 1–8). Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/invest-in-research/pdf/download_en/patents_for_researchers.pdf.
  6. Fink, A. (2005). Conducting research literature reviews: From the Internet to paper. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  7. Google Patents. (n.d.). Retrieved January 8, 2018, from https://patents.google.com/.
  8. Khare, R., Leaman, R., & Lu, Z. (2014). Accessing biomedical literature in the current information landscape. Methods in Molecular Biology (Clifton, N.J.), 1159, 11–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kramer, D. (2005). How to read a patent. ASHRAE Journal, 47(5), 90–92.Google Scholar
  10. O’Leary, Z. (2005). Researching real-world problems: A guide to methods of inquiry. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.Google Scholar
  11. Shah, P. (1998). Successful study: The essential skills. Andover: Cengage Learning EMEA.Google Scholar
  12. Tantra, R., Brown, R. J. C., Milton, M. J. T., & Gohil, D. (2008). A practical method to fabricate gold substrates for surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy. Applied Spectroscopy, 62(9), 992–1000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. WIPO - Search International and National Patent Collections. (n.d.). Retrieved January 8, 2018, from https://patentscope.wipo.int/search/en/search.jsf.

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ratna Tantra
    • 1
  1. 1.PortsmouthUK

Personalised recommendations