Advertisement

Relating an Adaptive Social Network’s Structure to Its Emerging Behaviour Based on Homophily

  • Jan Treur
Conference paper
Part of the Studies in Computational Intelligence book series (SCI, volume 813)

Abstract

In this paper it is analysed how emerging behaviour of an adaptive network for bonding based on homophily can be related to characteristics of the adaptive network’s structure, which includes the structure of the adaptation principles used. Relevant characteristics have been identified, such as a tipping point for homophily; it has been found how the emergence of clusters strongly depends on the value of this tipping point. It is shown that some properties of the structure of the network and the adaptation principle entail that the connection weights all converge to 0 (for states in different clusters) or 1 (for states within one cluster).

References

  1. 1.
    Beukel, S. van, Goos, S., Treur, J.: An adaptive temporal-causal network model for social networks based on the homophily and more-becomes-more principle. Neurocomputing (2018)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Blankendaal, R., Parinussa, S., Treur, J.: A temporal-causal modelling approach to integrated contagion and network change in social networks. In: Proceedings of the 22nd European Conference on Artificial Intelligence, ECAI 2016. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, vol. 285, pp. 1388–1396. IOS Press (2016)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Boomgaard, G., Lavitt, F. Treur, J.: Computational analysis of social contagion and homophily based on an adaptive social network model. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Social Informatics, SocInfo 2018. LNCS, vol. 11185, pp. 86–101. Springer, Berlin (2018)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Brauer, F., and Nohel, J.A.: Qualitative Theory of Ordinary Differential Equations. Benjamin (1969)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hirsch, M.W.: The dynamical systems approach to differential equations. Bull. (New Series) Am. Math. Soc. 11, 1–64 (1984)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Holme, P., Newman, M.E.J.: Nonequilibrium phase transition in the coevolution of networks and opinions. Phys. Rev. E 74(5), 056108 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Levy, D.A., Nail, P.R.: Contagion: A theoretical and empirical review and reconceptualization. Genetic, Soc. General Psychol. Monogr. 119(2), 233–284 (1993)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lotka, A.J.: Elements of Physical Biology, 2nd edn. Williams and Wilkins Co. (1924), Dover Publications (1956)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., Cook, J.M.: Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Ann. Rev. Sociol. 27(1), 415–444 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Pearson, M., Steglich, C., Snijders, T.: Homophily and assimilation among sport-active adolescent substance users. Connections 27(1), 47–63 (2006)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sharpanskykh, A., Treur, J.: Modelling and analysis of social contagion in dynamic networks. Neurocomputing 146(2014), 140–150 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Treur, J.: Verification of temporal-causal network models by mathematical analysis. Vietnam J. Comput. Sci. 3, 207–221 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Treur, J.: Network-Oriented Modeling: Addressing Complexity of Cognitive, Affective and Social Interactions. Springer Publishers, Berlin (2016)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Treur, J.: Modelling and analysis of the dynamics of adaptive temporal-causal network models for evolving social interactions. Comput. Soc. Netw. 4(4), 1–20 (2017)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Treur, J.: The Ins and Outs of Network-Oriented Modeling: from Biological Networks and Mental Networks to Social Networks and Beyond. Transactions on Computational Collective Intelligence, in press. In: Keynote Lecture at the 10th International Conference on Computational Collective Intelligence, ICCCI 2018 (2018)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Vazquez, F.: Opinion dynamics on coevolving networks. In: Mukherjee, A., Choudhury, M., Peruani, F., Ganguly, N., Mitra, B. (eds.): Modeling and Simulation in Science, Engineering and Technology. Dynamics on and of Complex Networks, vol. 2, pp. 89–107. Springer, New York (2013)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Vazquez, F., Gonzalez-Avella, J.C., Egu´ıluz, V.M., San Miguel, M.: Time-scale competition leading to fragmentation and recombination transitions in the coevolution of network and states. Phys. Rev. E 76, 046120 (2007)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Behavioural Informatics GroupVrije Universiteit AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations