Visual Interactivity to Make Sense of Heterogeneous Streams of Design Activity Data

  • Yasuhiro Yamamoto
  • Kumiyo NakakojiEmail author
Conference paper


The goal of our project is to design computational environments to help understand or presume the origin, trajectories, or relationships of a certain part or aspect of an existing designed artifact.



The research presented in this paper is partially supported by JST CREST Grant Number JPMJCR1401 Japan. We would like to thank Nobuto Matsubara for his technical discussions and support.


  1. 1.
    Ye Y, Yamamoto Y, Nakakoji K (2008) Expanding the knowing capability of software developers through knowledge collaboration. IJTPM (Int J Technol, Policy Manag) 8(1):41–58 (Special Issue on Human Aspects of Information Technology Development, Inderscience Publishers)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mining Software Repositories. (visited 2017-12-01)
  3. 3.
    Chaturvedi KK, Sing VB, Singh P (2013) Tools in mining software repositories. In: Proceedings of 13th international conference on computational science and its applications 2013. Ho Chi Minh City, 2013, pp 89–98Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Moran TP, Carroll JM (eds) (1996) Design rationale: concepts, techniques, and use. CRC PressGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Schoen DA (1983) The reflective practitioner: how professionals think in action. Basic Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Carroll JM (ed) (2013) Creativity and rationale: enhancing human experience by design. Human-Computer Interaction Series, Springer, LondonGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rittel HWJ (1972) On the planning crisis: systems analysis of the first and second generations. Bedriftsokonomen 8:390–396Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Conklin J, Begeman M (1988) gIBIS: a hypertext tool for exploratory policy discussion. Ransactions oj Office Injonnation Systems 6(4):303–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Compendium. [] (visited 2017–12)
  10. 10.
    Bracewell R, Wallace K (2003) A tool for capturing design rationale. In: Proceedings of international conference on engineering design (ICED’03), Stockholm, Sweden, pp 185–186Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kirschner PA, Buckingham Shum SJ, Carr CS (eds) (2003) Visualizing argumentation: software tools for collaborative and educational sense-making. Springer, London, UKGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hassanaly P, Herrmann T, Kunau G, Zacklad M (eds) (2006) Cooperative systems design: seamless integration of artifacts and conversations—enhanced concepts of infrastructure for communication. In: Frontiers in artificial intelligence and applications, IOS Press, p 137Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Fischer G, Grudin J, Lemke AC, McCall R, Ostwald J, Reeves BN, Shipman F (1992) Supporting indirect, collaborative design with integrated knowledge-based design environments. Human Comput Interact 7(3):281–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hisarciklilar O, Boujut J-F (2007) An annotation based approach to support design communication. In: Proceedings of international conference on engineering design (ICED’07). Paris, France, pp 170–180Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Do EY-L (2011) Sketch that scene for me and meet me in cyberspace. In: Wang X, Tsai JJ-H (eds) Collaborative design in virtual environments, ISCA 48. Springer, pp 121–130Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Rekimoto J (1999) Time-machine computing: a time-centric approach for the information environment. In: Proceedings of the ACM symposium on user interface software and technology (UIST’99), pp 45–54Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hill WC, Hollan JD, Wroblewski D, McCandless T (1992) Edit wear and read wear. In: Proceedings of ACM conference on human factors in computing systems (CHI’92), pp 3–9Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Shirai Y, Yamamoto Y, Nakakoji K (2009) Time-based authoring tools for informal information management. In: Symposium on interactive visual information collections and activity (IVICA2009). Austin, TX, pp 1–6Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Mangano N, LaToza TD, Petre M, van der Hoek (2014) Supporting informal design with interactive whiteboards. In: Conference on human factors in computing systems (CHI2014), April 2014, pp 331–340Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Shirai Y, Yamamoto Y, Nakakoji K (2006) A history-centric approach for enhancing web browsing experiences. In: Extended abstracts of conference on human factors in computing systems (CHI2006), pp 1319–1324Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Girgensohn A, Marlow J, Shipman F, Wilcox L, (2016) Guiding users through asynchronous meeting content with hypervideo playback plans. In: Proceedings of the 27th ACM conference on hypertext and social media (HT’16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp 49–59Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Mattoso M, Glavic B (eds) (2016) Proceedings of 6th international provenance and annotation workshop, IPAW 2016. McLean, VA, USA, June 7–8, 2016; Proceedings, lecture notes in computer science, vol 9672. SpringerGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Silva C, Freire J, Santos E, Anderson E (2010) Provenance-enabled data exploration and visualization with VisTrails. In: 2010 23rd SIBGRAPI conference on Graphics, patterns and images tutorials (SIBGRAPI-T), pp 1–9Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Freire J, Koop D, Santos E, Silva CT (2008) Provenance for computational tasks: a survey. Comput Sci Eng 10(3):11–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Wheat AJ (2015) External representation of provenance in intelligence analysis, In: Infovis sensemaing workshopGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Gotz D, Zhou MX (2009) Characterizing users visual analytic activity for insight provenance. Inf Visual 8(1):42–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Nakakoji K, Yamamoto Y, Kita Y (2016) Visual interaction design for experiencing and engaging with a large chronological table. In: Proceedings of the 3rd Histoinformatics workshop on computational history (Histoinformatics 2016). Krakow, Poland, pp 47–51Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Nakakoji K, Yamamoto Y, Matsubara N, Kawashima T, Hamuro N, Uno T (2017) Visual interactivity for understanding relationships and uncovering correlations among temporal numerical data of thousands of elements. In: Proceedings of the 31st annual conference of the japanese society for artificial intelligence (JSAI2017), 2D2-4in2. Nagoya, Japan, pp 1–3 (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Nakakoji K, Yamamoto Y, Matsubara N, Shirai Y (2012) Toward unweaving streams of thought for reflection in early stages of software design. IEEE Softw Spec Issue Studying Prof Softw Des 29(1):34–38Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Ingold T (2007) Lines: a brief history. RoutledgeGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Kyoto UniversityKyotoJapan

Personalised recommendations