Advertisement

A Visualization Tool to Investigate the Interplay of External and Internal Processes

  • Mia A. Tedjosaputro
  • Yi-Teng Shih
Conference paper

Abstract

This paper explores the potential of a newly devised visualization tool to facilitate empirical studies related to external and internal design processes.

References

  1. 1.
    Bilda Z, Gero JS, Purcell T (2006) To sketch or not to sketch? That is the question. Des Stud 27:587–613CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bilda Z, Gero JS (2007) The impact of working memory limitations on the design process during conceptualization. Des Stud 28:343–367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bilda Z, Gero JS (2008) Idea development can occur using imagery only. In: Gero JS, Goel AK (eds). Springer, Netherlands, Dordrecht, pp 303–320Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fish J, Scrivener S (1990) Amplifying the mind’s eye: sketching and visual cognition. Leonardo 23:117–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Goldschmidt G (1991) The dialectics of sketching. Creativity Res J 4:123–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kavakli M, Scrivener SAR, Ball LJ (1998) Structure in idea sketching behaviour. Des Stud 19:485–517CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Pallasmaa J (2009) The thinking hand: existential and embodied wisdom in architecture. Wiley [distributor]Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Goldschmidt G (2003) The backtalk of self-generated sketches. Des Issues 19:72–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bernal M, Haymaker JR, Eastman C (2015) On the role of computational support for designers in action. Des Stud 41(Part B):163–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Shapiro L (2010) Embodied cognition. RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Campbell G, Shapiro L (2011) Embodied cognition with Lawrence Shapiro. In: Campbell G (ed) Brain science podcastGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Leitan ND, Chaffey L (2014) Embodied cognition and its applications: a brief review. Sensoria: A Jof Mind Brain Culture 10:3–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wilson M (2002) Six views of embodied cognition. Psychon Bull Rev 9:625–636CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wilson A, Golonka S (2013) Embodied cognition is not what you think it is. Frontiers in Psychol 4:1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Clark A (2008) Supersizing the mind: embodiment, action, and cognitive extension. OUP USAGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gero JS, Kannengiesser U (2004) The situated function–behaviour–structure framework. Des Stud 25:373–391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kolbeinsson A, Lindblom J (2015) Mind the body: how embodied cognition matters in manufacturing. Procedia Manuf 3:5184–5191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gibson JJ (1986) The ecological approach to visual perception. Lawrence Erlbaum AssociatesGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hirose N (2002) An ecological approach to embodiment and cognition. Cogn Syst Res 3:289–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Norman DA (2002) The design of everyday things. Basic Books, NormanGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ericsson KA, Simon HA (1993) Protocol analysis: verbal reports as data revised edition. MIT Press, Cambridge, MassGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Bilda Z, Gero J (2006) Reasoning with internal and external representations: a case study with expert architects. In: Sun R (ed) The annual meeting of cognitive science society. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp 1020–1026Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Finke RA, Ward TB, Smith SM (1992) Creative cognition: theory, research and applications. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Suwa M, Purcell T, Gero J (1998) Macroscopic analysis of design processes based on a scheme for coding designers’ cognitive actions. Des Stud 19:455–483CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Goldschmidt G (2014) Linkography [electronic resource]: unfolding the design process. MIT PressGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of NottinghamNingboChina

Personalised recommendations