Advertisement

Wearable Device Data for Criminal Investigation

  • Sarah Mcnary
  • Aaron Hunter
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11342)

Abstract

Wearable devices collect and share data through social networks accessed by a smartphone. We can therefore view the smartphone carried by a criminal suspect as a central repository of information that may be useful in a criminal investigation. But it is not clear how this information can be used to deduce conclusive, legally admissible evidence. The challenges here are not only technological, but practical. In this paper, we discuss the challenges faced when we try to abstract criminal data from wearable devices. We also present a case study involving a wearable fitness tracker. In particular, we try to determine if a phone synced with a fitness tracker can provide evidence related to the execution of a violent act. While the approach presented here opens up a new area for investigators to look for evidence, our results suggest that it can actually be difficult to obtain concrete digital evidence in this manner.

Keywords

Wearable devices Forensic investigation Information retrieval Experimental methods Information security 

References

  1. 1.
    Adams, P.S., Keyserling, W.M.: Three methods for measuring range of motion while wearing protective clothing: a comparative study. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 12(3), 177–191 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    De Pessemier, T., Martens, L.: Heart rate monitoring, activity recognition, and recommendation for e-coaching. Multimed. Tools Appl. 77(18), 23317–23334 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Jo, E., Lewis, K., Directo, D., Kim, M.J., Dolezal, B.A.: Validation of biofeedback wearables for photoplethysmographic heart rate tracking. J. Sports Sci. Med. 15(3), 540–547 (2016)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kanitthika, K., Soochan, K., Kaewkannate, K., Kim, S.: A comparison of wearable fitness devices. BMC Public Health 16, 1–16 (2016)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Loeffler, C.E.: Detecting gunshots using wearable accelerometers. PLoS One 9(9), 1–6 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sasaki, J.E., et al.: Validation of the Fitbit wireless activity tracker for prediction of energy expenditure. J. Phys. Act Health 12(2), 149–154 (2015)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Shcherbina, A., et al.: Accuracy in wrist-worn, sensor-based measurements of heart rate and energy expenditure in a diverse cohort. J. Pers. Med. 7(2), 3 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sushames, A., Edwards, A., Thompson, F., McDermott, R., Gebel, K.: Validity and reliability of fitbit flex for step count, moderate to vigorous physical activity and activity energy expenditure. PLoS One 11(9), 1–14 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Thiebaud, R.S., et al.: Validity of wrist-worn consumer products to measure heart rate and energy expenditure. Digit. Health 4 2018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wallen, M.P., Gomersall, S.R., Keating, S.E., Wisloff, U., Coombes, J.S.: Accuracy of heart rate watches: implications for weight management. PLoS One 11(5), 1–11 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Computing and Academic StudiesBritish Columbia Institute of TechnologyBurnabyCanada

Personalised recommendations