Uncertainty Evaluation for Big Data of Mass Standards in a Key Comparison

  • Xiaoping RenEmail author
  • Fang Nan
  • Jian Wang
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11342)


This paper describes a key comparison of mass standards APMP.M.M-K5, conducted between nineteen participating members of the Asia-Pacific Metrology Programme (APMP). The application of the Monte Carlo method is used in the processing of the measurement result of APMP.M.M-K5, which is a kind of big data set. Monte Carlo method can get over the limitations that apply in certain cases to the method described in GUM.


Big data Monte Carlo method Key comparison Reference value Degree of equivalence 



The grants that have been received from the National Key R&D Program of China (2016YFF0200102).


  1. 1.
    Aupetit, C., Becerra, L.O., Bignell, N., et al.: Final report on CIPM key comparison of 1 kg standards in stainless steel. Metrol. Tech. Suppl. 41, 1–31 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Becerra, L.O., Bich, W., et al.: Final report on CIPM key comparison of multiples and submultiples of the kilogram (CCM.M-K2). Metrologia 40(1A), 1–27 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gosset, A., Madec, T.: Final report: CCM.M-K3 comparison/50 kg mass. Metrologia 42, 1–19 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Becerra, L.O., Borys, M., et al.: Key comparison of 1 kg stainless steel mass standards CCM.M-K4. Metrologia 51, 1–22 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Andel, I.V., Becerra, L.O., et al.: Report on CIPM key comparison of the second phase of multiples and submultiples of the kilogram (CCM.M-K5). Metrologia 48, 1–40 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Abbott, P.J., Becerra, L.O., et al.: Final report of CCM key comparison of mass standards CCM.M-K6, 50 kg. Metrologia 52, 1–24 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lee, S.J., Borys, M., et al.: The final report for CCM.M-K7: key comparison of 5 kg, 100 g, 10 g, 5 g and 500 mg stainless steel mass standards. Metrologia 54, 1–23 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cai, C., Ren, X., Hao, G., Wang, J., Huang, T.: Statistical analysis of CCM.M-K1 international comparison based on Monte Carlo method. In: Carretero, J., et al. (eds.) ICA3PP 2016. LNCS, vol. 10049, pp. 146–155. Springer, Cham (2016). Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cox, M.G.: The evaluation of key comparison data. Metrologia 39, 589–595 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ren, X.P., Wang, J., Wang, X.L., Dong, Y., Yang F.: Evaluation of APMP.M.M-K1 inter-comparisons by monte carlo method. In: 36th Chinese Control Conference Proceeding, pp. 9879–9882. IEEE Press, Dalian (2017)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ren, X.P., Wang, J., Wang X.L., et al.: Evaluation of measurement inter-comparison (CCM.M-K5) by Monte Carlo method. In: IMEKO International Seminar on Measurement Proceeding, pp. 160–162. IMEKO, Hangzhou (2017)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sugiyama, S.: Monte carlo simulation/risk analysis on a spreadsheet: review of three software packages. Foresight 9, 36–42 (2008)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Beascoa, M., et al.: Implementation in MATLAB of the adaptive monte carlo method for the evaluation of measurement uncertainties. Accred. Qual. Assur. 14, 95–106 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ren, X.P., Wang, J., Hu, M.H., et al.: APMP.M.M-K5 mass comparison based on monte carlo method. In: APMF2017, pp. 1–3. APMF, Krabi (2017)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.National Center for Science and Technology EvaluationBeijingPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.National Institute of MetrologyBeijingPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations