Advertisement

Towards New Privacy Regulations in Europe: Users’ Privacy Perception in Recommender Systems

  • Itishree Mohallick
  • Katrien De Moor
  • Özlem Özgöbek
  • Jon Atle Gulla
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11342)

Abstract

Despite the fact that recommender systems are becoming increasingly popular in every aspect of the web, users might hesitate to use these personalization-based services in return of their personal information if they believe their privacy is compromised in any possible way. While new privacy regulations in Europe bring more transparency and control over data collection to users, this study aims to provide a better understanding of the users’ perception over privacy in recommender systems domain over several aspects such as behavioral preferences, privacy preferences, trust, data ownership and control over own data through an on-line survey. The results indicate that the majority of the respondents consider that recommender systems violate user privacy in different ways. Further, the results indicate that increased control and perceived sense of ownership over one’s own data may help to decrease the negative attitudes towards recommender systems and providers and to re-instate and increase users’ trust. However, the findings also indicate that users’ trust may be hard to re-establish in cases where the thought of “apparently”/in theory go hand in hand with more transparency and user control will in reality/in practice not lead to drastic changes.

Keywords

Privacy Recommender systems Privacy perception EU GDPR User study 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work is a part of the master thesis which is supported by the NTNU SmartMedia program on news recommendation.

References

  1. 1.
    Ackerman, M.S., Cranor, L.F., Reagle, J.: Privacy in e-commerce: examining user scenarios and privacy preferences. In: Proceedings of the 1st ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce, pp. 1–8. ACM (1999)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Adams, A.: Users’ perception of privacy in multimedia communication. In: Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 1999, pp. 53–54. ACM (1999)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Antón, A.I., Earp, J.B., Young, J.D.: How internet users’ privacy concerns have evolved since 2002. IEEE Secur. Priv. 8(1), 21–27 (2010).  https://doi.org/10.1109/MSP.2010.38. ISSN: 1540-7993CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Awad, N.F., Krishnan, M.S.: The personalization privacy paradox: an empirical evaluation of information transparency and the willingness to be profiled online for personalization. MIS Q. 30(1), 13–28 (2006). http://www.jstor.org/stable/25148715CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Barnes, S.B.: A privacy paradox: social networking in the United States. First Monday 11(9) (2006). http://journals.uic.edu/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/1394
  6. 6.
    Cavoukian, A., Fisher, A., Killen, S., Hoffman, D.A.: Remote home health care technologies: how to ensure privacy? Build it in: privacy by design. Identity Inf. Soc. 3(2), 363–378 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chellappa, R.K., Sin, R.G.: Personalization versus privacy: an empirical examination of the online consumers dilemma. Inf. Tech. Manag. 6(2–3), 181–202 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    European Commission: Attitudes on data protection and electronic identity in the European Union, June 2011. http://ec.europa.eu/commfrontoffice/publicopinion/archives/ebs/ebs_359_en.pdf
  9. 9.
  10. 10.
    Cranor, L.F., Reagle, J., Ackerman, M.S.: Beyond concern: understanding net users attitudes about online privacy. In: The Internet Upheaval: Raising Questions, Seeking Answers in Communications Policy, pp. 47–70 (2000)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Fox, S., Rainie, L., Horrigan, J., Lenhart, A., Spooner, T., Carter, C.: Trust and privacy online: why Americans want to rewrite the rules. The Pew Internet and American Life Project, pp. 1–29 (2000)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Henry, G.T.: Practical Sampling, vol. 21. Sage, Thousand Oaks (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Knijnenburg, B.P., Berkovsky, S.: Privacy for recommender systems: tutorial abstract. In: Proceedings of the Eleventh ACM Conference on Recommender Systems, pp. 394–395. ACM (2017)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kobsa, A.: Tailoring privacy to users’ needs1. In: Bauer, M., Gmytrasiewicz, P.J., Vassileva, J. (eds.) UM 2001. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2109, pp. 301–313. Springer, Heidelberg (2001).  https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44566-8_52CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lederer, S., Mankoff, J., Dey, A.K.: Who wants to know what when? Privacy preference determinants in ubiquitous computing. In: Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 2003, pp. 724–725. ACM (2003)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mohallick, I., Özgöbek, Ö.: Exploring privacy concerns in news recommender systems. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Web Intelligence, pp. 1054–1061. ACM (2017)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mohallick, I., Özgöbek, Ö.: A survey on Norwegian user perspective on privacy in recommender systems. In: Proceedings of the 3rd Norwegian Big Data Symposium (NOBIDS 2017) in Conjunction with NxtMedia Conference 2017. CEUR Workshop Proceedings (2017)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Oates, B.J.: Researching Information Systems and Computing. Sage Publications Ltd., Thousand Oaks (2006)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Olson, J., Grudin, J., Horvitz, E.: Toward understanding preferences for sharing and privacy. In: Proceedings of the CHI (2004)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Olson, J.S., Grudin, J., Horvitz, E.: A study of preferences for sharing and privacy. In: Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 2005, pp. 1985–1988. ACM (2005)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Pötzsch, S.: Privacy awareness: a means to solve the privacy paradox? In: Matyáš, V., Fischer-Hübner, S., Cvrček, D., Švenda, P. (eds.) Privacy and Identity 2008. IAICT, vol. 298, pp. 226–236. Springer, Heidelberg (2009).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-03315-5_17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Taylor, D.G., Davis, D.F., Jillapalli, R.: Privacy concern and online personalization: the moderating effects of information control and compensation. Electron. Commer. Res. 9(3), 203–223 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Toch, E., Wang, Y., Cranor, L.F.: Personalization and privacy: a survey of privacy risks and remedies in personalization-based systems. User Model. User-Adap. Interact. 22(1–2), 203–220 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Itishree Mohallick
    • 1
  • Katrien De Moor
    • 2
  • Özlem Özgöbek
    • 1
  • Jon Atle Gulla
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Computer ScienceNTNUTrondheimNorway
  2. 2.Department of Information Security and Communication TechnologyNTNUTrondheimNorway

Personalised recommendations