Advertisement

Surface-Modified-CNTs/Al Matrix Nanocomposites Produced via Spark Plasma Sintering: Microstructures, Properties, and Formation Mechanism

  • Farhad Saba
  • Faming ZhangEmail author
  • Seyed Abdolkarim Sajjadi
  • Mohsen Haddad-Sabzevar
Chapter

Abstract

The aim of this work was to perform surface modification of carbon nanotubes (CNTs) in order to utilize them as reinforcements into aluminum matrix nanocomposites. The surface modification of carbon nanotubes was carried out through a three-stage process. At stage 1, mechanical crushing of Ti and MWCNTs was performed via ultrasonication and wet milling. Then, in stage 2, additional pristine MWCNTs were added into the crushed mixture of Ti/MWCNT via ultrasonication and wet-milling methods in different mixing ratios. The mixing ratio of crushed mixture to pristine MWCNT varied from 1:2 to 5:2. Finally, pressureless spark plasma sintering (SPS) was applied in stage (3) to coat and/or decorate the pristine MWCNTs with nanocrystalline titanium carbide (TiC). The surface-modified CNTs, thereafter, were used to prepare Al-matrix composites (AMCs) through SPS method. First of all, the optimum mixing ratio, in which optimal thermal and mechanical properties can be achieved, was determined using composites containing 1 wt.% surface-modified CNTs. Changing the CNT content (within the range of 0.5–5 wt.%) in the fixed optimum mixing ratio (4:2) revealed the effect of surface-modified CNTs content on mechanical and wear properties of composite samples. It was demonstrated that 1.5 wt.% carbon additive brought about the best properties in composite samples. The microstructure of the modified samples was investigated using scanning (SEM) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) while X-ray diffraction (XRD) was used to identify phase structures. In order to evaluate thermal properties of the modified CNTs, thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) were carried out. TGA results revealed significant improvement in thermal stability of modified CNTs comparing the unmodified ones, especially in 4:2 mixing ratio. Raman spectroscopy was also conducted to identify the quality and the defects over CNTs structures. Furthermore, a formation mechanism was presented for carbide nanostructures in this study. The nature of surface-modified regions was characterized by selected area electron diffraction (SAED) and convergent beam electron diffraction (CBED) patterns. It was found that nanocrystalline TiCs grow epitaxially on the surface of the pristine carbon nanotubes with an orientation relationship of CNT (002)//TiC (200) at the interface. Carbide morphologies, depending remarkably on the energy level of carbon sources, were mostly TiC nanoparticles and a smaller fraction of TiC nanoblocks. Moreover, a little carbide nanotubes and nanorods were observed in 4:2 mixing ratio. Preferential sites for TiC nucleation, e.g., bamboo-like defects and unzipping sites, were thoroughly investigated by high-resolution electron microscopy studies. Mechanical properties of composite samples were evaluated by microhardness, nanoindentation, and compression test. In this regard, the optimal sample exhibited 176% and 71% increase in Vickers hardness, compared to pure Al and 1.5 wt.% unmodified-CNT/Al composite sample, respectively. In addition, 82% and 45% increase in nanohardness as well as 48% and 25.5% increase in Young’s modulus was achieved for the mentioned modified sample compared to pure Al and 1.5 wt.% unmodified sample, respectively. In the case of tribological characteristics, reduction of around 68% and 61% in mean friction coefficient and reduction of about 88% and 84.5% in wear weight loss were obtained for 1.5 wt.% modified-CNT/Al composite, compared to the pure Al and 1.5 wt.% unmodified sample, respectively. According to surface modification mechanism, it was found that carbide-modified regions enhanced load-bearing efficiency of carbon reinforcements owing to linking the outer walls to inner walls, allowing the naturally inactive inner walls to contribute in load transfer phenomenon through TiC nanoparticles.

Keywords

Carbon nanotubes (CNT) Titanium carbide (TiC) Surface modification Spark plasma sintering (SPS) Aluminum matrix composite (AMC) 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors appreciate the financial supports of Ferdowsi University of Mashhad regarding the PhD program with the number of 3/31889 (adopted on 29 October 2014). In addition, the authors gratefully acknowledge the financial supports from the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (No. BK20161419), Jiangsu Key Laboratory for Advanced Metallic Materials (No. BM2007204) at Southeast University, and Scientific Research Foundation for the Returned Overseas Chinese Scholars at the State Education Ministry (No. 2015–1098).

References

Journal Article

  1. Al-Qutub AM, Khalil A, Saheb N et al (2013) Wear and friction behavior of Al6061 alloy reinforced with carbon nanotubes. Wear 297:752–761.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2012.10.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Annu A, Bhattacharya B, Singh PK et al (2017) Carbon nanotube using spray pyrolysis: recent scenario. J Alloys Compd 691:970–982.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.08.246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bacon R (1960) Growth, structure, and properties of graphite whiskers. J App Phys 31:283–290.  https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1735559CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bakshi SR, Agarwal A (2011) An analysis of the factors affecting strengthening in carbon nanotube reinforced aluminum composites. Carbon 49:533–544.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2010.09.054CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Banks CE, Compton RG (2006) New electrodes for old: from carbon nanotubes to edge plane pyrolytic graphite. Analyst 131:15–21.  https://doi.org/10.1039/B512688FCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Banks CE, Ji X, Crossley A et al (2006) Understanding the electrochemical reactivity of bamboo multiwalled carbon nanotubes: the presence of oxygenated species at tube ends may not increase electron transfer kinetics. Electroanalysis 18:2137–2140.  https://doi.org/10.1002/elan.200603633CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bokhonov BB, Dudina DV (2016) Preparation of porous materials by spark plasma sintering: peculiarities of alloy formation during consolidation of Fe@ Pt core-shell and hollow Pt (Fe) particles. J Alloys Compd 707:233–237.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.09.146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bradbury WL, Olevsk EA (2010) Production of SiC-C composites by free pressureless spark plasma sintering (FPSPS). Scr Mater 63:77–80.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2010.03.009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chen R, Li Y, Huo K et al (2013) Microelectrode arrays based on carbon nanomaterials: emerging electrochemical sensors for biological and environmental applications. RSC Adv 3:18698–18715.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C3RA43033BCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chen B, Li S, Imai H et al (2015a) Inter-wall bridging induced peeling of multi-walled carbon nanotubes during tensile failure in aluminum matrix composites. Micron 69:1–5.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micron.2014.10.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chen B, Li S, Imai H et al (2015b) Load transfer strengthening in carbon nanotubes reinforced metal matrix composites via in-situ tensile tests. Compos Sci Technol 113:1–8.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2015.03.009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chen B, Kondoh K, Imai H et al (2016) Simultaneously enhancing strength and ductility of carbon nanotube/aluminum composites by improving bonding conditions. Scr Mater 113:158–162.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2015.11.011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cho S, Kikuchi K, Miyazaki T et al (2013) Epitaxial growth of chromium carbide nanostructures on multiwalled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) in MWCNT-copper composites. Acta Mater 61:708–716.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2012.10.022CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Choi HJ, Kwon GB, Lee GY et al (2008) Reinforcement with carbon nanotubes in aluminum matrix composites. Scr Mater 59:360–363.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2008.04.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Choi H, Shin J, Min B et al (2009) Reinforcing effects of carbon nanotubes in structural aluminum matrix nanocomposites. J Mater Res 24:2610–2616.  https://doi.org/10.1557/jmr.2009.0318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Deng C, Zhang X, Wang D et al (2007) Preparation and characterization of carbon nanotubes/aluminum matrix composites. Mater Lett 61:1725–1728.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2006.07.119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dresselhaus MS, Dresselhaus G, Saito R et al (2005) Raman spectroscopy of carbon nanotubes. Phys Rep 409:47–99.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2004.10.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dudiy SV, Lundqvist BI (2004) Wetting of TiC and TiN by metals. Phys Rev B 69:125421–125516.  https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.69.125421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Esawi AMK, Morsi K, Sayed A et al (2010) Effect of carbon nanotube (CNT) content on the mechanical properties of CNT-reinforced aluminum composites. Compos Sci Technol 70:2237–2241.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2010.05.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Estili M, Kawasaki A (2010) Engineering strong intergraphene shear resistance in multi-walled carbon nanotubes and dramatic tensile improvements. Adv Mater 22:607–610.  https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.200902140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Estili M, Sakka Y (2014) Recent advances in understanding the reinforcing ability and mechanism of carbon nanotubes in ceramic matrix composites. Sci Technol Adv Mater 15:64902–64925CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Estili M, Sakka Y, Kawasaki A (2013) Unprecedented simultaneous enhancement in strain tolerance, toughness and strength of Al2O3 ceramic by multiwall-type failure of a high loading of carbon nanotubes. Nanotechnology 24:155702–155709CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. George R, Kashyap KT, Rahul R et al (2005) Strengthening in carbon nanotube/aluminium (CNT/Al) composites. Scr Mater 53:1159–1163.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2005.07.022CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ibrahim A, Zhang F, Otterstein E et al (2011) Processing of porous Ti and Ti5Mn foams by spark plasma sintering. Mater Des 32:146–153.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2010.06.019CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Iijima S (1991) Helical microtubules of graphitic carbon. Nature 354:56.  https://doi.org/10.1038/354056a0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Johansson LI (1995) Electronic and structural properties of transition-metal carbide and nitride surfaces. Surf Sci Rep 21:177–250.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-5729(94)00005-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kim I, Lee JH, Lee GS et al (2009) Friction and wear characteristics of the carbon nanotube–aluminum composites with different manufacturing conditions. Wear 267:593–598.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2008.12.096CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kim IH, Lee W, Lee CW et al (2010) Effect of SiC coating on interfacial reaction between carbon short fiber and Al melt. Surf Interface Anal 42:743–747.  https://doi.org/10.1002/sia.3378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kurita H, Estili M, Kwon H et al (2015) Load-bearing contribution of multi-walled carbon nanotubes on tensile response of aluminum. Compos Part A 68:133–139.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2014.09.014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kuzumaki T, Miyazawa K, Ichinose H et al (1998) Processing of carbon nanotube reinforced aluminum composite. J Mater Res 13:2445–2449.  https://doi.org/10.1557/JMR.1998.0340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kwon H, Bradbury CR, Leparoux M (2011) Fabrication of functionally graded carbon nanotube-reinforced aluminum matrix composite. Adv Eng Mater 13:325–329.  https://doi.org/10.1002/adem.201000251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lahiri D, Ghosh S, Agarwal A (2012) Carbon nanotube reinforced hydroxyapatite composite for orthopedic application: a review. Mater Sci Eng C 32:1727–1758.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2012.05.010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Landry K, Kalogeropoulou S, Eustathopoulos N (1998) Wettability of carbon by aluminum and aluminum alloys. Mater Sci Eng A 254:99–111.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-5093(98)00759-XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lao JY, Li WZ, Wen JG et al (2002) Boron carbide nanolumps on carbon nanotubes. Appl Phys Lett 80:500–502.  https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1435062CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Li S, Sun B, Imai H et al (2013) Powder metallurgy Ti-TiC metal matrix composites prepared by in situ reactive processing of Ti-VGCFs system. Carbon 61:216–228.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2013.04.088CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Li S, Su Y, Ouyang Q et al (2016) In-situ carbon nanotube-covered silicon carbide particle reinforced aluminum matrix composites fabricated by powder metallurgy. Mater Lett 167:118–121.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2015.12.155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Liang C, Ding L, Wang A et al (2009) Microwave assisted preparation and hydrazine decomposition properties of nanostructured tungsten carbides on carbon nanotubes. Ind Eng Chem Res 48:3244–3248.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ie801591xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Liu W, Chai S, Mohamed AR et al (2014) Synthesis and characterization of graphene and carbon nanotubes: a review on the past and recent developments. J Ind Eng Chem 20:1171–1185.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2013.08.028CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Liu ZY, Zhao K, Xiao BL et al (2016) Fabrication of CNT/Al composites with low damage to CNTs by a novel solution-assisted wet mixing combined with powder metallurgy processing. Mater Des 97:424–430.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2016.02.121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lyu Y, Bergseth E, Olofsson U (2016) Open system tribology and influence of weather condition. Sci Rep 6:32455–32466.  https://doi.org/10.1038/srep32455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Mei H, Bai Q, Dassios KG et al (2015) Oxidation resistance of aligned carbon nanotube reinforced silicon carbide composites. Ceram Int 41:12495–12498.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2015.06.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Molina JM, Voytovych R, Louisa E et al (2007) The surface tension of liquid aluminum in high vacuum: the role of surface condition. Int J Adhes Adhes 27:394–401.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2006.09.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Morisada Y, Miyamoto Y (2004) SiC-coated carbon nanotubes and their application as reinforcements for cemented carbides. Mater Sci Eng A 381:57–61.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2004.03.055CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Morsi K, Esawi AMK, Borah P et al (2010) Properties of single and dual matrix aluminum-carbon nanotube composites processed via spark plasma extrusion (SPE). Mater Sci Eng A 527:5686–5690.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2010.05.081CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Nam DH, Cha SI, Lim BK et al (2012) Synergistic strengthening by load transfer mechanism and grain refinement of CNT/Al-Cu composites. Carbon 50:2417–2423.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2012.01.058CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Nuriel S, Liu L, Barber AH et al (2005) Direct measurement of multiwall nanotube surface tension. Chem Phys Lett 404:263–266.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cplett.2005.01.072CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Oberlin A, Endo M, Koyama T (1976) Filamentous growth of carbon through benzene decomposition. J Cryst Growth 32:335–349.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0248(76)90115-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Park JG, Keum DH, Lee YH (2015) Strengthening mechanisms in carbon nanotube-reinforced aluminum composites. Carbon 95:690–698.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2015.08.112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Peng B, Locascio M, Zapol P et al (2008) Measurements of near-ultimate strength for multiwalled carbon nanotubes and irradiation induced crosslinking improvements. Nat Nanotechnol 3:626–631.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2008.211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Phuong DD, Van Trinh P, Van An N et al (2014) Effects of carbon nanotube content and annealing temperature on the hardness of CNT reinforced aluminum nanocomposites processed by the high pressure torsion technique. J Alloys Compd 613:68–73.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2014.05.219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Quan Y, Zhang F, Rebl H et al (2013) Ti6Al4V foams fabricated by spark plasma sintering with post-heat treatment. Mater Sci Eng A 565:118–125.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2012.12.026CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Radushkevich L, Lukyanovich V (1952) About the structure of carbon formed by thermal decomposition of carbon monoxide on iron substrate. J Phys Chem 26:88–95Google Scholar
  53. Rhee SK (1970) Wetting of ceramics by liquid aluminum. J Am Ceram Soc 53:386–389.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1151-2916.1970.tb12138.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Saba F, Kabiri E, Vahdati-Khaki J et al (2016a) Fabrication of nanocrystalline TiC coating on AISI D2 steel substrate via high-energy mechanical alloying of Ti and C. Powder Technol 288:76–86.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2015.10.030CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Saba F, Zhang F, Sajjadi SA et al (2016b) Pulsed current field assisted surface modification of carbon nanotubes with nanocrystalline titanium carbide. Carbon 101:261–271.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2016.02.012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Saba F, Sajjadi SA, Haddad-Sabzevar M et al (2017) Formation mechanism of nano titanium carbide on multi-walled carbon nanotube and influence of the nanocarbides on the load-bearing contribution of the nanotubes inner-walls in aluminum-matrix composites. Carbon 115:720–729.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2017.01.062CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Saba F, Sajjadi SA, Haddad-Sabzevar M et al (2018) TiC-modified carbon nanotubes, TiC nanotubes and TiC nanorods: synthesis and characterization. Ceram Int.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2018.01.233
  58. Selcuk C, Kennedy AR (2006) Al-TiC composite made by the addition of master alloys pellets synthesized from reacted elemental powders. Mater Lett 60:3364–3366.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2006.03.021CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Singu BS, Male U, Srinivasan P et al (2017) Preparation and performance of polyaniline–multiwall carbon nanotubes–titanium dioxide ternary composite electrode material for supercapacitors. J Ind Eng Chem 49:82–87.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2017.01.010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. So KP, Jeong JC, Park JG et al (2013) SiC formation on carbon nanotube surface for improving wettability with aluminum. Compos Sci Technol 74:6–13.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2012.09.014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Son SY, Um SH, Jang H-S et al (2017) Effective disentangling method of bundled multi-walled carbon nanotubes into individual multi-walled carbon nanotubes by magnetic-field induction. J Ind Eng Chem 46:28–34.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2016.09.030CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Stein J, Lenczowski B, Frety N et al (2012) Mechanical reinforcement of a high-performance Al alloy AA5083 with homogeneously dispersed multi-walled carbon nanotubes. Carbon 50:2264–2272.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2012.01.044CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Stevenson ME, Kaji M, Bradt RC (2002) Microhardness anisotropy and the indentation size effect on the basal plane of single crystal hematite. J Eur Ceram Soc 22:1137–1148.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0955-2219(01)00415-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Taguchi T, Igawa N, Yamamoto H et al (2005) Synthesis of silicon carbide nanotubes. J Am Ceram Soc 88:459–461.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-2916.2005.00066.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Taguchi T, Yamamoto H, Shamoto S (2007) Synthesis and characterization of single-phase TiC nanotubes, TiC nanowires, and carbon nanotubes equipped with TiC nanoparticles. J Phys Chem C 111:18888–18891.  https://doi.org/10.1021/jp0756909CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Taguchi T, Kibria AF, Shamoto S (2013) Morphology change of multi-walled carbon nanotubes with SiC coating by electron irradiation. J Phys Conf Ser, IOP Publishing, 417:012037–012043.Google Scholar
  67. Tjong SC (2006) Structural and mechanical properties of polymer nanocomposites. Mater Sci Eng R 53:73–197.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mser.2006.06.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Wang X, Padture NP, Tanaka H (2004) Contact-damage-resistant ceramic/single-wall carbon nanotubes and ceramic/graphite composites. Nat Mater 3:539–544.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat1161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Wei H, Li Z, Xiong DB et al (2014) Towards strong and stiff carbon nanotube-reinforced high-strength aluminum alloy composites through a microlaminated architecture design. Scr Mater 75:30–33.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2013.11.014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Xie S, Li W, Pan Z et al (2000) Mechanical and physical properties on carbon nanotube. J Phys Chem Solids 61:1153–1158.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3697(99)00376-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Yamanoglu R, Gulsoy N, Olevsky E et al (2016) Production of porous Ti5Al2.5Fe alloy via pressureless spark plasma sintering. J Alloys Compd 680:654–658.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.04.176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Yoo SJ, Han SH, Kim WJ (2013a) A combination of ball milling and high-ratio differential speed rolling for synthesizing carbon nanotube/copper composites. Carbon 61:487–500.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2013.04.105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Yoo SJ, Han SH, Kim WJ (2013b) Strength and strain hardening of aluminum matrix composites with randomly dispersed nanometer-length fragmented carbon nanotubes. Scr Mater 68:711–714.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2013.01.013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Zafari A, Ghasemi HM, Mahmudi R (2014) An investigation on the tribological behavior of AZ91 and AZ91+3wt% RE magnesium alloys at elevated temperatures. Mater Des 54:544–552.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2013.08.073CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Zang JB, Lu J, Wang YH et al (2010) Fabrication of core-shell structured MWCNT-Ti(TiC) using a one-pot reaction from a mixture of TiCl3,TiH2, and MWCNTs. Carbon 48:3802–3806.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2010.06.043CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Zhang F, Lin K, Chang J et al (2008) Spark plasma sintering of macroporous calcium phosphate scaffolds from nanocrystalline powders. J Eur Ceram Soc 28:539–545.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2007.07.012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Zhang F, Reich M, Kessler O et al (2013) Potential of rapid cooling spark plasma sintering for metallic materials. Mater Today 16:192–195.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mattod.2013.05.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Zhou S, Zhang X, Ding Z et al (2007) Fabrication and tribological properties of carbon nanotubes reinforced Al composites prepared by pressureless infiltration technique. Compos A Appl Sci Manuf 38:301–306.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2006.04.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Zhou D, Shenbao J, Yanjun L et al (2013) Effect of stoichiometry on the surface energies of {100} and {111} and the crystal shape of TiCx and TiNx. Cryst Eng Comm 15:643–649.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C2CE26419FCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Book and Chapter

  1. Agarwal A, Bakshi SR, Lahiri D (2011) Carbon nanotubes reinforced metal matrix composites, 2nd edn. Taylor & Francis, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. Kosolapova TY (2012) Carbides: properties, production, and applications. Springer Science & Business Media, Springer US, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. Morisada Y, Miyamoto Y (2006) Nanostructured coatings on advanced carbon materials. In: Ceramic-matrix composites: microstructure, properties and applications, Woodhead Publishing, Cambridge CB1 6AH, EnglandGoogle Scholar
  4. Pujado MP (2012) Carbon nanotubes as platforms for biosensors with electrochemical and electronic transduction, 1st edn. SpringerGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Farhad Saba
    • 1
  • Faming Zhang
    • 2
    Email author
  • Seyed Abdolkarim Sajjadi
    • 1
  • Mohsen Haddad-Sabzevar
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Engineering FacultyFerdowsi University of MashhadMashhadIran
  2. 2.Jiangsu Key Lab for Advanced Metallic Materials, School of Materials Science and EngineeringSoutheast UniversityNanjingChina

Personalised recommendations