Advertisement

Terminal Appointment System

  • Filip Covic
Chapter
Part of the Contributions to Management Science book series (MANAGEMENT SC.)

Abstract

The Terminal Appointment System is suggested in practical terminal applications and the scientific literature as one method to cope with inadequate arrival information of external trucks. By applying a Terminal Appointment System, truck companies book a certain time slot by announcing their arrival at the terminal a predefined period beforehand. This enhancement of information can be utilised by terminals to adjust their operations and, as a consequence, streamline container handling. In this practical context, the influence of central design and operational parameters of the Terminal Appointment System on yard block operations is analysed in this chapter while employing the online heuristic approach for re-marshalling devised in the previous chapter. Hence, the focus is put on yard block productivity where the Terminal Appointment System is employed only to obtain truck arrival information without imposing any capping per time slot or inducing restrictions on the planned arrivals of trucks. Therefore, the considerations on re-marshalling of the previous chapter are integrated with the information generating aspect of the Terminal Appointment System in order to analyse the effects of different degrees of information quality and quantity on container handling. The empirical study is conducted by simulation based on a rigorous experimental design and statistical evaluation.

References

  1. Banks J, Carson JS II, Nelson BL, DM Nicol (2010) Discrete-event system simulation, 5th edn. Pearson, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  2. Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y (1995) Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc B 57(1):289–300Google Scholar
  3. Chen G, Govindan K, ZZ Yang, TM Choi, Jiang L (2013) Terminal appointment system design by non-stationary M(t)∕E kc(t) queueing model and genetic algorithm. Int J Prod Econ 146(2):694–703CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Covic F (2017) Re-marshalling in automated container yards with terminal appointment systems. Flex Serv Manuf J 29(3–4):433–503CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Davis P (2009) Container terminal reservation systems. In: 3rd annual METRANS national urban Freight conference, Long BeachGoogle Scholar
  6. Giuliano G, O’Brien T (2007) Reducing port-related truck emissions: the terminal gate appointment system at the ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach. Transp Res D Transp Environ 12(7):453–528CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Guan C, Liu R (2009) Container terminal gate appointment system optimization. Marit Econ Logist 11(4):378–398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hamburger Hafen und Logistik (HHLA) (2016) Vormeldepflicht fuer LKW-Transporte. https://hhla.de/de/trucker-info/vormeldepflicht.html. Hamburger Hafen und Logisitk AG. Accessed on 16 Mar 2017
  9. Huynh N (2005) Methodologies for reducing truck turn time at marine container terminals. Ph.D. thesis, The University of Texas at AustinGoogle Scholar
  10. Huynh N, Walton M (2011) Improving efficiency of drayage operations at seaport container terminals through the use of an appointment system. In: Böse JW (ed) Handbook of terminal planning. Volume 49 of operations research/computer science interfaces series. Springer, New York, pp 323–344Google Scholar
  11. Kemme N (2013) Design and operation of automated container storage systems. Contributions to management science, 1st edn. Physica, HeidelbergCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kendall MG (1938) A new measure of rank correlation. Biometrika 30(1–2):81–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Maguire A, Ivey S, MM Golias, Lipinski ME (2010) Relieving congestion at intermodal marine container terminals: review of tactical/operational strategies. In: 51st annual transportation research forum, ArlingtonGoogle Scholar
  14. Morais P, Lord E (2006) Terminal appointment system study. Transport Canada publication TP 14570E, Transportation Development Centre of Transport Canada, MontrealGoogle Scholar
  15. Namboothiri R, Erea AL (2008) Planning local container drayage operations given a port access appointment system. Transp Res E Log Transp Rev 44(2):185–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Phan MH, Kim KH (2015) Negotiating truck arrival times among trucking companies and a container terminal. Transp Res E Log Transp Rev 75:132–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Phan MH, Kim KH (2016) Collaborative truck scheduling and appointments for trucking companies and container terminals. Transp Res B Methodol 86:37–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Schulte F, Lalla-Ruiz E, González-Ramírez RG, Voß S (2017) Reducing port-related empty truck emissions: a mathematical approach for truck appointments with collaboration. Transp Res E Log Transp Rev 105:195–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Shiri S, Huynh N (2016) Optimization of drayage operations with time-window constraints. Int J Prod Econ 176:7–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. van Asperen E, Borgman B, Dekker R (2013) Evaluating impact of truck announcements on container stacking efficiency. Flex Serv Manuf J 25(4):543–556CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Wilcoxon F (1945) Individual comparisons by ranking methods. Biom Bull 1(6):80–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Zehendner E, Feillet D (2014a) Benefits of a truck appointment system on the service quality of inland transport modes at a multimodal container terminal. Eur J Oper Res 235(2):461–469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Zhang X, Zeng Q, Chen W (2013) Optimization model for truck appointment in container terminals. Procedia Soc Behav Sci 96:1938–1947CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Zhao W, AV Goodchild (2010) The impact of truck arrival information on container terminal rehandling. Transp Res E Log Transp Rev 46(3):327–343CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Filip Covic
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute for Operations Research, HBS Hamburg Business SchoolUniversity of HamburgHamburgGermany

Personalised recommendations