Advertisement

Self-Healing at Ply Surfaces: Adhesion, Cohesion, and Interfacial Toughening Evaluated Using Blister and Impact Tests

  • Alexander L. YarinEmail author
  • Min Wook Lee
  • Seongpil An
  • Sam S. Yoon
Chapter
Part of the Advanced Structured Materials book series (STRUCTMAT, volume 105)

Abstract

In this Section the adhesion (blister) test is discussed in Sects. 8.1 and 8.2 regarding the performances of two types of nanotextured vascular self-healing materials and their effects on the adhesion and cohesion energies. In Sect. 8.3, double-cantilever beam and bending tests, applied for the mechanical characterization of self-healing materials, are discussed. Section 8.4 outlines the interfacial toughening by means of nanofibers (NFs) intended to prevent delamination and crack propagation. In addition, damage to interfacial layers toughened by NFs is characterized by impact testing. Sect. 8.5 provides comprehensive data on mechanical recovery in self-healing vascular materials. In addition to the essentially two-dimensional self-healing materials discussed in Sects. 7.1, 7.2, 7.3 and 7.4 and 8.1, 8.2, 8.3, 8.4 and 8.5, the mechanical behaviors of their three-dimensional counterparts are explored in Sect. 8.6.

References

  1. An S, Liou M, Song KY, Jo HS, Lee MW, Al-Deyab SS, Yarin AL, Yoon SS (2015) Highly flexible transparent self-healing composite based on electrospun core–shell nanofibers produced by coaxial electrospinning for anti-corrosion and electrical insulation. Nanoscale 7:17778–17785CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arinstein A, Burman M, Gendelman O, Zussman E (2007) Effect of supramolecular structure on polymer nanofibre elasticity. Nat Nanotechnology 2:59–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ballarin FM, Blackledge TA, Davis NLC, Frontini PM, Abraham GA, Wong S-C (2013) Effect of topology on the adhesive forces between electrospun polymer fibers using a T-peel test. Polym Eng Sci 53:2219–2227Google Scholar
  4. Barenblatt GI (2014) Flow, deformation and fracture. Cambridge Univ. Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bleay SM, Loader CB, Hawyes VJ, Humberstone L, Curtis PT (2001) A smart repair system for polymer matrix composites. Compos A 32:1767–1776CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brown EN (2011) Use of the tapered double-cantilever beam geometry for fracture toughness measurements and its application to the quantification of self-healing. JStA 46:167–186Google Scholar
  7. Brown EN, Sottos NR, White SR (2002) Fracture testing of a self-healing polymer composite. ExM 42:372–379Google Scholar
  8. Brown EN, White SR, Sottos NR (2004) Microcapsule induced toughening in a self-healing polymer composite. J Mater Sci 39:1703–1710CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brown EN, White SR, Sottos NR (2005) Retardation and repair of fatigue cracks in a microcapsule toughened epoxy composite – Part I: manual infiltration. Compos Sci Technol 65:2466–2473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chen C, Peters K, Li Y (2013a) Self-healing sandwich structures incorporating an interfacial layer with vascular network. SMaS 22:025031Google Scholar
  11. Chen Q, Zhao Y, Zhou Z, Rahman A, Wu X-F, Wu W, Xu T, Fong H (2013b) Fabrication and mechanical properties of hybrid multi-scale epoxy composites reinforced with conventional carbon fiber fabrics surface attached with electrospun carbon nanofiber mats. Compos B 44:1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Coppola AM, Thakre PR, Sottos NR, White SR (2014) Tensile properties and damage evolution in vascular 3D woven glass/epoxy composites. Compos A 59:9–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Daelemans L, van der Heijden S, De Baere I, Rahier H, Van Paepegem W, De Clerck K (2015) Nanofibre bridging as a toughening mechanism in carbon/epoxy composite laminates interleaved with electrospun polyamide nanofibrous veils. Compos Sci Technol 117:244–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Daelemans L, van der Heijden S, De Baere I, Rahier H, Van Paepegem W, De Clerck K (2016) Damage-resistant composites using electrospun nanofibers: a multiscale analysis of the toughening mechanisms. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 8:11806–11818CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Derjaguin BV, Muller VM, Toporov YP (1975) Effect of contact deformations on the adhesion of particles. J Colloid Interface Sci 53:314–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. De Schoenmaker B, Van der Heijden S, De Baere I, Van Paepegem W, De Clerck K (2013) Effect of electrospun polyamide 6 nanofibres on the mechanical properties of a glass fibre/epoxy composite. Polym Testing 32:1495–1501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dry C (1996) Procedures developed for self-repair of polymer matrix composite materials. Compos Struct 35:263–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dzenis YA, Reneker DH (2001) Delamination resistant composites prepared by small diameter fiber reinforcement at ply interfaces. U.S. Patent 6265333Google Scholar
  19. Fang Y, Wang C-F, Zhang Z-H, Shao H, Chen S (2013) Robust self-healing hydrogels assisted by cross-linked nanofiber networks. Scientific Reports 3:2811CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fifo O, Ryan K, Basu B (2014) Glass fibre polyester composite with in vivo vascular channel for use in self-healing. SMaS 23:095017Google Scholar
  21. Hamilton AR, Sottos NR, White SR (2011) Pressurized vascular systems for self-healing materials. J R Soc Interface 2011:1–9Google Scholar
  22. Hansen CJ, Wu W, Toohey KS, Sottos NR, White SR, Lewis JA (2009) Self-healing materials with interpenetrating microvascular networks. Adv Mater 21:4143–4147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hart KR, Sottos NR, White SR (2015) Repeatable self-healing of an epoxy matrix using imidazole initiated polymerization. Polymer 67:174–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hayes SA, Zhang W, Branthwaite M, Jones FR (2007) Self-healing of damage in fibre-reinforced polymer-matrix composites. J R Soc Interface 4:381–387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hutchinson JW, Suo Z (1992) Mixed mode cracking in layered materials. Adv Appl Mech 29:63–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Irwin GR, Kies JA (1954) Critical energy rate analysis of fracture strength. American Welding Society Journal 33:193–198Google Scholar
  27. Jin H, Miller GM, Sottos NR, White SR (2011) Fracture and fatigue response of a self-healing epoxy adhesive. Polymer 52:1628–1634CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Jones AS, Rule JD, Moore JS, Sottos NR, White SR (2007) Life extension of self-healing polymers with rapidly growing fatigue cracks. J R Soc Interface 4:395–403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kessler MR, Sottos NR, White SR (2003) Self-healing structural composite materials. Compos A 34:743–753CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kim JS, Reneker DH (1999) Mechanical properties of composites using ultrafine electrospun fibers. Polym Compos 20:124–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kling S, Czigany T (2014) Damage detection and self-repair in hollow glass fiber fabric-reinforced epoxy composites via fiber filling. Compos Sci Technol 99:82–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Laffan MJ, Pinho ST, Robinson P, McMillan AJ (2012) Translaminar fracture toughness testing of composites: a review. Polym Testing 31:481–489CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lee MW, An S, Jo HS, Yoon SS, Yarin AL (2015) Self-healing nanofiber-reinforced polymer composites: 2. Delamination/debonding, and adhesive and cohesive properties. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 7:19555–19561CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lee MW, An S, Kim YI, Yoon SS, Yarin AL (2018) Self-healing three-dimensional bulk materials based on core-shell nanofibers. Chem Eng J 334:1093–1100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lee MW, Sett S, An S, Yoon SS, Yarin AL (2017a) Self-healing nano-textured vascular-like materials: Mode I crack propagation. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 9:27223–27231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lee MW, Sett S, Yoon SS, Yarin AL (2016a) Self-healing of nanofiber-based composites in the course of stretching. Polymer 103:180–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lee MW, Sett S, Yoon SS, Yarin AL (2016b) Fatigue of self-healing nanofiber-based composites: static test and subcritical crack propagation. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 8:18462–18470CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lee MW, Yoon SS, Yarin AL (2016c) Solution-blown core–shell self-healing nano- and microfibers. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 8:4955–4962CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lee MW, Yoon SS, Yarin AL (2017b) Release of self-healing agents in a material: What happens next? ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 9:17449–17455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Li AAW (2014) An experimental investigation on the three-point bending behavior of composite laminate. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng 62:012016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Li G, Ajisafe O, Meng H (2013) Effect of strain hardening of shape memory polymer fibers on healing efficiency of thermosetting polymer composites. Polymer 54:920–928CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Malyshev BM, Salganik RL (1965) The strength of adhesive joints using the theory of cracks. Int J Fract Mech 1:114–128Google Scholar
  43. Molnar K, Kostakova E, Meszaros L (2014) The effect of needleless electrospun nanofibrous interleaves on mechanical properties of carbon fabrics/epoxy laminates. Express Polym Lett 8:62–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Mostovoy S, Crosley PB, Ripling EJ (1967) Use of crack-line-loaded specimens for measuring planestrain fracture toughness. J Mater 2:661–681Google Scholar
  45. Motuku M, Vaidya UK, Janowski GM (1999) Parametric studies on self-repairing approaches for resin infused composites subjected to low velocity impact. Smart Mater Struct 8:623–638CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Na H, Chen P, Wan K-T, Wong S-C, Li Q, Ma Z (2012) Measurement of adhesion work of electrospun polymer membrane by shaft-loaded blister test. Langmuir 28:6677–6683CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Najem JF, Wong S-C, Ji G (2014) Shear adhesion strength of aligned electrospun nanofibers. Langmuir 30:10410–10418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Norris CJ, Bond IP, Trask RS (2011a) The role of embedded bioinspired vasculature on damage formation in self-healing carbon fibre reinforced composites. Compos A 42:639–648CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Norris CJ, Bond IP, Trask RS (2011b) Interactions between propagating cracks and bioinspired self-healing vascules embedded in glass fibre reinforced composites. Compos Sci Technol 71:847–853CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Norris CJ, Bond IP, Trask RS (2013) Healing of low-velocity impact damage in vascularized composites. Compos A 44:78–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Norris CJ, Meadway GJ, O’Sullivan MJ, Bond IP, Trask RS (2011c) Self-healing fibre reinforced composites via a bioinspired vasculature. Adv Funct Mater 21:3624–3633CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Norris CJ, White JAP, McCombe G, Chatterjee P, Bond IP, Trask RS (2012) Autonomous stimulus triggered self-healing in smart structural composites. Smart Mater Struct 21:094027CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Obreimoff JW (1930) The splitting strength of mica. Proc R Soc A 127:290–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Pang JWC, Bond IP (2005a) ‘Bleeding composites’—damage detection and self-repair using a biomimetic approach. Compos A 36:183–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Pang JWC, Bond IP (2005b) A hollow fibre reinforced polymer composite encompassing self-healing and enhanced damage visibility. Compos Sci Technol 65:1791–1799CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Papa E, Corigliano A (2001) Mechanical behaviour of a syntactic foam/glass fibre composite sandwich: experimental results. Struct Eng Mech 12:169–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Papkov D, Zou Y, Andalib MN, Goponenko A, Cheng SZ, Dzenis YA (2013) Simultaneously strong and tough ultrafine continuous nanofibers. ACS Nano 7:3324–3331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Patrick JF, Hart KR, Krull BP, Diesendruck CE, Moore JS, White SR, Sottos NR (2014) Continuous self-healing life cycle in vascularized structural composites. Adv Mater 26:4302–4308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Rule JD, Brown EN, Sottos NR, White SR, Moore JS (2005) Wax-protected catalyst microspheres for efficient self-healing materials. Adv Mater 17:205–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Rule JD, Sottos NR, White SR (2007) Effect of microcapsule size on the performance of self-healing polymers. Polymer 48:3520–3529CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Sett S, Lee MW, Weith M, Pourdeyhimi B, Yarin AL (2015) Biodegradable and biocompatible soy protein/polymer/adhesive sticky nano-textured interfacial membranes for prevention of Esca fungi invasion into pruning cuts and wounds of vines. J Mater Chem B 3:2147–2162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Stafford GD, Handley RW (1975) Transverse bend testing of denture base polymers. J Dent 3:251–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Stafford GD, Smith DC (1968) Some studies of the properties of denture base polymers. Br Dent J 125:337–342Google Scholar
  64. Standard Test Method for Flexural Properties of Unreinforced and Reinforced Plastics and Electrical Insulating Materials by Four-Point Bending (1968) D6272: American Society for Testing and MaterialsGoogle Scholar
  65. Standard Methods of Test for Flexural Properties of Plastics (1970) ASTM: D790-71: American Society for Testing and MaterialsGoogle Scholar
  66. Toohey KS, Hansen CJ, Lewis JA, White SR, Sottos NR (2009a) Delivery of two-part self-healing chemistry via microvascular networks. Adv Mater 19:1399–1405Google Scholar
  67. Toohey KS, Sottos NR, Lewis JA, Moore JS, White SR (2007) Self-healing materials with microvascular networks. Nat Mater 6:581–585CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Toohey KS, Sottos NR, White SR (2009b) Characterization of microvascular-based self-healing coatings. ExM 49:707–717Google Scholar
  69. Trask RS, Bond IP (2006) Biomimetic self-healing of advanced composite structures using hollow glass fibres. SMaS 15:704–710Google Scholar
  70. Trask RS, Williams GJ, Bond IP (2007) Bioinspired self-healing of advanced composite structures using hollow glass fibres. J R Soc Interface 4:363–371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Vahedi V, Pasbakhsh P, Piao CS, Seng CE (2015) A facile method for preparation of self-healing epoxy composites: using electrospun nanofibers as microchannels. J Mater Chem A 3:16005–16012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. van der Heijden S, Daelemans L, De Schoenmaker B, De Baere I, Rahier H, Van Paepegem W, De Clerck K (2014) Interlaminar toughening of resin transfer moulded glass fibre epoxy laminates by polycaprolactone electrospun nanofibers. Compos Sci Technol 104:66–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Wan K-T, Mai Y-W (1995) Fracture mechanics of a shaft-loaded blister of thin flexible membrane on rigid substrate. Int J Fract 74:181–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. White SR, Moore JS, Sottos NR, Krull BP, Cruz WAS, Gergely RCR (2014) Restoration of large damage volumes in polymers. Science 344:620–623CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. White SR, Sottos NR, Geubelle PH, Moore JS, Kessler MR, Sriram SR, Brown EN, Viswanathan S (2001) Autonomic healing of polymer composites. Nature 409:794–797CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Whitney J, Browning C, Mair A (1974) Analysis of the flexure test for laminated composite materials. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PACrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Williams HR, Trask RS, Bond IP (2007a) Self-healing composite sandwich structures. SMaS 16:1198–1207Google Scholar
  78. Williams G, Trask R, Bond I (2007b) A self-healing carbon fibre reinforced polymer for aerospace applications. Compos A 38:1525–1532CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Williams HR, Trask RS, Bond IP (2008) Self-healing sandwich panels: Restoration of compressive strength after impact. Compos Sci Technol 68:3171–3177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Williams GJ, Bond IP, Trask RS (2009) Compression after impact assessment of self-healing CFRP. Compos A 40:1399–1406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Wong S-C, Na H, Chen P (2013) Measurement of adhesion energy of electrospun polymer membranes using a shaft-loaded blister test. 13th Int Conf Fract, 1–7Google Scholar
  82. Wu X-F (2003) Fracture of advanced polymer composites with nanofiber-reinforced interfaces. Ph.D. Thesis. University of Nebraska-Lincoln: Lincoln, Nebraska, USAGoogle Scholar
  83. Wu X-F (2009) Fracture of advanced composites with nanofiber reinforced interfaces. VDM, SaarbruckenGoogle Scholar
  84. Wu X-F, Rahman A, Zhou Z, Pelot DD, Sinha-Ray S, Chen B, Payne S, Yarin AL (2013) Electrospinning core-shell nanofibers for interfacial toughening and self-healing of carbon-fiber/epoxy composites. J Appl Polym Sci 129:1383–1393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Wu X-F, Yarin AL (2013) Recent progress in interfacial toughening and damage self-healing of polymer composites based on electrospun and solution-blown nanofibers: an overview. J Appl Polym Sci 129:2225–2237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Zainuddin S, Arefin T, Fahim A, Hosur MV, Tyson JD, Kumar A, Trovillion J, Jeelani S (2014) Recovery and improvement in low-velocity impact properties of e-glass/epoxy composites through novel self-healing technique. Compos Struct 108:277–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Zanjani JSM, Okan BS, Letofsky-Papst I, Menceloglu Y, Yildiz M (2015) Repeated self-healing of nano and micro scale cracks in epoxy based composites by tri-axial electrospun fibers including different healing agents. RSC Adv 5:73133–73145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Zanjani JSM, Okan BS, Yilmaz C, Menceloglu Y, Yildiz M (2017) Monitoring the interface and bulk self-healing capability of triaxial electrospun fibers in glass fiber reinforced epoxy composites. Compos A 99:221–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Zhang J, Yang T, Lin T, Wang CH (2012) Phase morphology of nanofibre interlayers: critical factor for toughening carbon/epoxy composites. Compos Sci Technol 72:256–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Zhang P, Li G (2015) Healing-on-demand composites based on polymer artificial muscle. Polymer 64:29–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Zussman E, Burman M, Yarin AL, Khalfin B, Cohen Y (2006) Tensile deformation of electrospun Nylon 6,6 nanofibers. J Polym Sci, Part B- Polymer Physics 44:1482–1489CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alexander L. Yarin
    • 1
    Email author
  • Min Wook Lee
    • 2
  • Seongpil An
    • 3
  • Sam S. Yoon
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Mechanical and Industrial EngineeringUniversity of Illinois at ChicagoChicagoUSA
  2. 2.Institute of Advanced Composite MaterialsKorea Institute of Science and TechnologyJeollabuk-doKorea (Republic of)
  3. 3.Department of Mechanical and Industrial EngineeringUniversity of Illinois at ChicagoChicagoUSA
  4. 4.School of Mechanical EngineeringKorea UniversitySeoulKorea (Republic of)

Personalised recommendations