Advertisement

The Male Womb

  • Amy Kenny
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Literature, Science and Medicine book series (PLSM)

Abstract

Male characters such as King Lear, Falstaff, Holofernes, Hamlet, Edgar, and Angelo rhetorically appropriate the womb to reveal their interiority to the audience. This chapter explores why the womb—and not male anatomy—is used to delineate their inner experiences. Male characters imagine their bodies possessing wombs, which proposes that their own bodies lack sufficient organs to articulate their inner passions, and subversively emphasizes the womb’s agency. Through an analysis of King Lear’s infamous self-diagnosis of hysterica passio, this chapter considers the semiotics of humoral wombs on stage in summoning a gendered, invisible organ in a visual medium. During performance, the storm and olfactory props render the womb perceptible within the theatrical space by externalizing popular herbal remedies for Lear’s wandering womb.

References

  1. Adelman, Janet. Suffocating Mothers: Fantasies of Maternal Origin in Shakespeare’s Plays. New York and London: Routledge, 1992.Google Scholar
  2. Aristotle. The Works of Aristotle the Famous Philosopher Containing his Complete Masterpiece and Family Physician; his Experienced Midwife, his Book of Problems and his Remarks on Physiognomy. London: Clifton, Chambers & Company, No year.Google Scholar
  3. Barnes, Barnabe. The Devil’s Charter. London: G. E. for John Wright, 1607.Google Scholar
  4. Barrough, Philip. The Method of Phisick, Containing Cases, Signs, and Cures of Inward Diseases in Man’s Body. London: Richard Field, 1596.Google Scholar
  5. Bate, John. The Mysteryes of Nature and Art. London, 1634.Google Scholar
  6. Bradwell, Stephen. Mary Glover’s Late Woeful Case, Together with her Joyful Deliverance. MS Sloane 831. 1646.Google Scholar
  7. C., R. I. D., M. S., T. B., The Compleat Midwife’s Practice Enlarged. Angel in Cornhill: Nathaniel Brookes, 1659.Google Scholar
  8. Crane, Mary Thomas. Shakespeare’s Brain: Reading with Cognitive Theory. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
  9. Crooke, Helkiah. Mikrokosmographia, A Description of the Body of Man. Barbican: W. Jaggard, 1616.Google Scholar
  10. Culpeper, Nicholas. Culpeper’s Directory for Midwives: or, A guide for women, The Second Part. London: Peter Cole, 1662.Google Scholar
  11. Culpeper, Nicholas. The compleat midwife’s practice enlarged. London: for H. Rhodes, J. Philips, J. Taylor, and K. Bentley, 1698.Google Scholar
  12. Eggert, Katherine. Disknowledge: Literature, Alchemy, and the End of Humanism in Renaissance England. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Eucharius Rösslin. The Birth of Mankind, Otherwise Called The Woman’s Book, trans Thomas Reynalde. London: By Thomas Raynalde, 1545.Google Scholar
  14. Fontanus, Nicholas. The Woman’s Doctor or, An exact and distinct explanation of all such diseases as are peculiar to that sex. London: John Blaque and Samuel Howes, 1652.Google Scholar
  15. Freud, Sigmund. The Interpretation of Dreams, 2nd issue. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
  16. Gerard, John. The Herball or General History of Plants. London: Adam Norton and Richard Whitakers, 1633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. H., J. This World’s Folly. London, 1615.Google Scholar
  18. Harsnett, Samuel. Declaration of egregious popish impostures. London: James Roberts, 1603.Google Scholar
  19. Harvey, William. Anatomical Exercitations Concerning the Generation of Living Creatures. London: James Young, 1653.Google Scholar
  20. Jonson, Ben. The Workes of Benjamin Jonson. London: William Stansby, 1616.Google Scholar
  21. Jorden, Edward. A Briefe Discourse of a Disease Called the Suffocation of the Mother. London: John Windet, 1603.Google Scholar
  22. Kahn, Coppélia. “The Absent Mother in King Lear.” In Rewriting the Renaissance: The Discourses of Sexual Difference in Early Modern Europe. Edited by Margaret W. Ferguson, Maureen Quilligan, and Nancy J. Vickers, 239–262. 1986. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1986.Google Scholar
  23. Marston, John. The Malcontent. London: Valentine Simmes for William Aspley, 1604.Google Scholar
  24. Marston, John. The Scourge of Villanie: Three Bookes of Satyres. London: J. Roberts, 1599.Google Scholar
  25. Maus, Katharine Eisaman. “A Womb of His Own: Male Renaissance Poets in the Female Body.” In Printing and Parenting in Early Modern England edited by Douglas A. Brooks, 89–108. Burlington: Ashgate, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Paré, Ambroise. ɶuvres. Paris: Gabriel Buon, 1598.Google Scholar
  27. Paré, Ambroise. The Works of that Famous Chirurgeon Ambrose Parey. Translated by T. H. Johnson. London: Mary Clark, 1678.Google Scholar
  28. Peterson, Kaara L. “Historica Passio: Early Modern Medicine, King Lear, and Editorial Practice.” Shakespeare Quarterly 57, no. 1 (2006): 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Pollard, Tanya. “Conceiving Tragedy.” In Shakespearean Sensations: Experiencing Literature in Early Modern England. Edited by Katharine A. Craik and Tanya Pollard, 85–101. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Sacks, Elizabeth. Shakespeare’s Images of Pregnancy. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Serlio, Sebastiano. A book of perspective and geometry, being the ABC, and first degree of all good art. London: M. S. for Thomas Jenner, 1657.Google Scholar
  32. Shakespeare, William. The Norton Shakespeare. Edited by Stephen Greenblatt, Walter Cohen, Jean E. Howard, Katharine Eisaman Maus, Gordon McMullan, and Suzanne Gossett, 3rd edition. New York City: W. W. Norton & Company, 2015.Google Scholar
  33. Shannon, Laurie. “Lear’s Queer Cosmos.” In Shakesqueer: A Queer Companion to the Complete Works of Shakespeare. Edited by Madhavi Menon, 171–178. Durham and London: Duke University Press, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Sharp, Jane. The Midwives Book: Or the Whole Art of Midwifery Discovered. London: Simon Miller, 1671.Google Scholar
  35. Traub, Valerie. “Prince Hal’s Falstaff: Positioning Psychoanalysis and the Female Reproductive Body.” Shakespeare Quarterly 40, no. 4 (1989): 456–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Whithorne, Peter. Certain Ways for the Ordering of Souldoious in Battelray, and Setting of Battles, after Diverse Fashions with Their Manner of Marching. London: T. East for J. Wight, 1588.Google Scholar
  37. Wright, Thomas. Passions of the Mind in General. London: Valentine Simmes for Walter Barre, 1604.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Amy Kenny
    • 1
  1. 1.University of CaliforniaRiversideUSA

Personalised recommendations