Humoral Wombs on the Shakespearean Stage pp 83-110 | Cite as
The Fertile Womb
Abstract
Early modern medical texts privilege scholastic knowledge over lived experience, suggesting female anatomy—epitomized by the womb—was secretive and unknowable. Medical practitioners were uncertain of how to diagnose pregnancy in the early stages, and often diminished the woman’s ability to determine gestation herself since many of the signs were open to interpretation. Even when it progressed to delivery, pregnancy offered a private, exclusively female space in early modern birth rituals, perpetuating its mystery to male observers. This chapter shows how Shakespeare often privileges female, experiential knowledge in a period which attempted to dismiss it outright. During childbirth scenes in Shakespeare’s canon, women become knowledge-bearers on which male characters depend, demonstrating how lineage and paternal identity are reliant on the female body.
References
- “True Copies of Certaine Loose Papers left by the Right honorable Elizabeth, Countess of Bridgewater, collected and transcribed together here since her death, anno din 1663, Examined by John Bridgewater.” Manuscript at Huntington Egerton Family papers, ca 1150–1803 (bulk 1580–1803): MS EL 8377–8391 box 210.Google Scholar
- Abbot, George. The case of impotency as debated in England: in that remarkable tryal an. 1613. between Robert, Earl of Essex, and the Lady Frances Howard, who, after eight years marriage, commenc’d a suit against him for impotency. London: printed for E. Curll, 1715a.Google Scholar
- Adelman, Janet. Suffocating Mothers: Fantasies of Maternal Origin in Shakespeare’s Plays. New York and London: Routledge, 1992.Google Scholar
- Anonymous, The English Midwife Enlarged. London: Printed for Rowland Reynolds, 1682.Google Scholar
- Anonymous. Aristotle’s Masterpiece. London: J. How, 1684.Google Scholar
- Anonymous. The bachelor’s banquet. London: T. Creede, 1603.Google Scholar
- Barrough, Philip. The Method of Phisick, Containing Cases, Signs, and Cures of Inward Diseases in Man’s Body. London: Richard Field, 1596.Google Scholar
- Belsey, Catherine. “Disrupting Sexual Difference: Meaning and Gender in the Comedies.” In Alternative Shakespeares. Edited by John Drakakis, 169–93. New York: Methuen, 1985.Google Scholar
- Bicks, Caroline. “Planned Parenthood: Minding the Quick Woman in All’s Well” Modern Philology 103:3 (2006): 299–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Bicks, Caroline. Midwiving Subjects in Shakespeare’s England. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2003.Google Scholar
- Bodleian, Ms Ashmole 215.Google Scholar
- Butterworth, Philip. Magic on the Early English Stage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
- C., R., I. D., M. S., T. B. The Compleat Midwife’s Practice Enlarged. Angel in Cornhill: Nathaniel Brookes, 1659.Google Scholar
- Chamberlain John. “Letter to Sir Dudley Carleton 23 June 1613.” In The English Renaissance: An Anthology of Sources and Documents. Edited by Kate Aughterson, 123. London and New York; Routledge, 1998.Google Scholar
- Culpeper, Nicholas. Culpeper’s Directory for Midwives. London: Peter Cole, 1662.Google Scholar
- Fissell, Mary E. Vernacular Bodies: The Politics of Reproduction in Early Modern England. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
- Floyd-Wilson, Mary. “English Mettle.” In Reading the Early Modern Passions, edited by Gail Kern Paster, Katherine Rowe, and Mary Floyd-Wilson, 130–146. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2004.Google Scholar
- Galen. Claudii Galeni Pergameni, secundum Hippocratem medicorum facile principis opus De usu partium corpius humani, trans Niccolò of Reggio. Paris: Simon de Colines, 1528.Google Scholar
- Garber, Marjorie. Vested Interests: Cross-Dressing and Cultural Anxiety. New York: Routledge, 2011.Google Scholar
- George Abbot, The case of impotency as debated in England: in that remarkable tryal an. 1613. between Robert, Earl of Essex, and the Lady Frances Howard, who, after eight years marriage, commenc’d a suit against him for impotency. London: printed for E. Curll, 1715b.Google Scholar
- Gowing, Laura. Common Bodies: Women, Touch, and Power in Seventeenth-Century England. New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
- Green, Monica H. “From Diseases of Women’ to ‘Secrets of Women’: The Transformation of Gynecological Literature in the Later Middle Ages,” Journal of Medieval and Early Modern Studies 30 (2000), 7–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Greenblatt, Stephen. “Fiction and Friction.” In Shakespearean Negotiations: The Circulation of Social Energy in Renaissance England, 66–93. Berkeley: U of California P, 1988.Google Scholar
- Guillimeau, James. Child-birth, or The Happy Delivery of Women. London: Anne Griffin for Joyce Norton and Richard Whitaker, [1612] 1635.Google Scholar
- Harris, Jonathan Gil. “All Swell That End Swell: Dropsy, Phantom Pregnancy, and the Sound of Deconception in ‘All’s Well That Ends Well’” Renaissance Drama 35 (2006), 169–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Harvey, William. Anatomica Exercitations, Concerning the Generation of Living Creatures. London: Printed by James Young for Octavia Pulleyn, 1653.Google Scholar
- Haslem, Lori Schroeder. “Troubled with the Mother”: Longings, Purgings, and the Maternal Body in Bartholomew Fair and The Duchess of Malfi” Modern Philology 92, no 4 (1995), 438–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Heywood, Thomas. The Royal King and Loyal Subject. London: 1637.Google Scholar
- Hibbert, Christopher. The Virgin Queen: Elizabeth I, Genius of the Golden Age. Reading, Pennsylvania: Addison-Wesley, 1991.Google Scholar
- Honigmann, E. W. J. Myriad-Minded Shakespeare: Essays on the Tragedies, Problem Comedies, and Shakespeare the Man. London: Macmillan, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Howell, Thomas Bayly. Cobbett’s Complete Collection of State Trials and Proceedings for High Treason and Other Crimes and Misdemeanors, Vol II. London: T. C. Hansard, 1809.Google Scholar
- Jardine, Lisa. Still Harping on Daughters: Women and Drama in the Age of Shakespeare. Sussex, UK: Harvester Press, 1983.Google Scholar
- John Chamberlain to Sir Dudley Carleton 23 June 1613 in The English Renaissance: An Anthology of Sources and Documents, edited by Kate Aughterson. London and New York; Routledge, 1998.Google Scholar
- Jones, John. The Arte and Science of Preserving Bodie and Soul. 1579. STC 14724.Google Scholar
- King, Helen. Midwifery, Obstetrics and the Rise of Gynaecology: The Uses of a Sixteenth-Century Compendium. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2007.Google Scholar
- Leigh, Dorothy. The mothers blessing. Or The godly counsaile of a gentle-woman not long since deceased. London: John Cudge, 1616.Google Scholar
- Lemay, Helen Rodnite. Women’s Secrets: A Translation of Pseudo-Albertus Magnus’s De secretis melierum with Commentaries. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1992.Google Scholar
- Levine, Nina S. “Refiguring the Nation: Mothers and Sons in King John.” In Women’s Matters: Politics, Gender, and Nation in Shakespeare’s Early History Plays, 123–45. University of Delaware Press, 1998.Google Scholar
- Luttfring, Sara D. Bodies, Speech, and Reproductive Knowledge in Early Modern England. New York: Routledge, 2016.Google Scholar
- Magnus, Pseudo-Albertus. De secretis melierum et vitorum. Leipzig: Melchior Lotter, 1501.Google Scholar
- Mann, David. Shakespeare’s Women: Performance and Conception. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
- McCandless, David. Gender and Performance in Shakespeare’s Problem Comedies. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
- McMath, James. The Expert Midwife. Edinburgh, 1682.Google Scholar
- Moncrief, Kathryn M. “‘Show me a child begotten of thy body that I am father to’: Pregnancy, Paternity, and the Problem of Evidence in All’s Well That Ends Well.” In Performing Maternity in Early Modern England. Edited by Kathryn M. Moncrief and Kathryn R. McPherson, 29–44. New York: Routledge, 2007.Google Scholar
- Moody, Joanna, ed, The Private Life of an Elizabethan Lady: The Diary of Lady Margaret Hoby, 1599–1605. Thrupp, Stroud, and Gloucestershire: Sutton Publishing, 1998.Google Scholar
- Napier, Richard. Case files, 20 October 1617, MS Ashmole 220.Google Scholar
- Orgel, Stephen. “Nobody’s Perfect: Or, Why Did the English Stage Take Boys for Women?” In South Atlantic Quarterly 88 (1989): 7–29.Google Scholar
- P., W. The Gossips Greeting. London, 1620.Google Scholar
- Painter, William. The Palace of Pleasure. London: Henry Denham, 1566.Google Scholar
- Paré, Ambroise. The Works of that Famous Chirurgeon Ambrose Parey. Translated by T. H. Johnson. London: Mary Clark, 1678.Google Scholar
- Paster, Gail Kern. The Body Embarrassed. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
- Pearson, Karl. The Chances of Death and Other Studies in Evolution, 2 vols. London: Edward Arnold, 1897.Google Scholar
- Peterson, Kaara L. “Shakespearean Revivifications: Early Modern Undead.” Shakespeare Studies, 32 (2004): 240–266.Google Scholar
- Rackin, Phyllis. “Androgyny, Mimesis, and the Marriage of the Boy Heroine on the English Renaissance Stage.” PMLA 102 (1987): 29–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Raynalde, Thomas. The Birth of Mankind, Otherwise Called The Woman’s Book. Translated by Thomas Raynalde. London: By Thomas Raynalde, 1545.Google Scholar
- Raynalde, Thomas. The Byrth of Mankynde. Translated by Richard Jonas. London 1540.Google Scholar
- Reynolds, Edward. A Treatise of the Passions and Faculties of the Soul of Man. London: R. H. for Robert Bostock, 1640.Google Scholar
- Richardson, Elizabeth. A Ladies Legacie to Her Daughters. London: Thomas Harper, 1645.Google Scholar
- Rösslin, Eucharius. The Birth of Mankind, Otherwise Called The Woman’s Book. Translated by Thomas Reynalde. London: J. L., Henry Hood, Abel Roper, and Richard Romlin, [1545] 1654.Google Scholar
- Rösslin, Eucharius. The byrth of mankynde, newly translated out of Laten into Englysshe. Translated by Richard Jonas. London: T[homas] R[aynald]], 1540.Google Scholar
- Rowlands, Samuel. ’Tis Merrie When Gossips Meet. London 1602.Google Scholar
- Rüff, Jacob. The Expert Midwife, or An Excellent and Most Necessary Treatise of the Generation and Birth of Man. London: E. Griffin for S. Burton, [1554] 1637.Google Scholar
- Sadler, John. The sick woman’s private looking glass. London: Anne Griffin, 1636.Google Scholar
- Scot, Reginald. The Discovery of Witchcraft. London: 1584.Google Scholar
- Sennertus, Daniel, Nicholas Culpeper, and Abdiah Cole, The Sixth Book of Practical Physik of Occult or Hidden Diseases. London: Peter Cole, 1662.Google Scholar
- Shakespeare, William. The Norton Shakespeare. Edited by Stephen Greenblatt, Walter Cohen, Jean E. Howard, Katharine Eisaman Maus, Gordon McMullan, and Suzanne Gossett, 3rd edition. New York City: W. W. Norton & Company, 2015.Google Scholar
- Sharp, Jane. The Midwives Book: Or the Whole Art of Midwifery Discovered. London: Simon Miller, 1671.Google Scholar
- Stubbes, Philip. The Anatomy of Abuses. London: Richard Jones, 1583.Google Scholar
- Thiel, Sara. “‘Cushion Come Forth’: Materializing Pregnancy on the Stuart Stage.” In Stage Matters: Props, Bodies, and Space in Shakespearean Performance. Edited by Annalisa Castaldo and Rhonda Knight, 143–158. Madison, NJ: Farleigh Dickinson University Press, 2018.Google Scholar
- Twine, Lawrence. The Pattern of Painful Adventures. London, 1594.Google Scholar
- van de Spiegel, Adriaan. De Formato Foetu Liber Exornatus. Padua: Apud Jo. Bap. de Martinis, & Livium Pasquatum, expensis ejusdem Liberalis Cremae, 1626.Google Scholar
- Vesalius, Andreas. De humani corporis fabrica. Basel: Johannes Oporinus, 1543.Google Scholar
- Willughby, Perceval. Observations in midwifery. Warwick: Shakespeare Printing Press, 1863, written 1672.Google Scholar
- Woodbridge, Linda. Women and the English renaissance: Literature and the Nature of Womankind, 1540–1620. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1984.Google Scholar
- Wright, Thomas. Passions of the Mind in General. London: Valentine Simmes for Walter Barre, 1604.Google Scholar