Advertisement

The Political in Transport and Mobility: Towards a Feminist Analysis of Everyday Mobility and Transport Planning

  • Tanja JoelssonEmail author
  • Christina Lindkvist Scholten
Chapter

Abstract

Transport and mobility are integrated with everyday activities in people’s lives. Transport research and planning has been characterized by utilitarian, rationalistic and quantitative epistemologies. Also, for a long time transport planning research has been gender coded as masculine. In this collection we show the importance of combining methodologies and that ‘numbers’ is useful when addressing issues of power and gender equality but also that qualitative and critical epistemologies bring important and necessary knowledge to the transport planning research field. This collection is a contribution to the research field of transport planning, representing a plurality of epistemologies—but with one important common denominator: transport planning as inheritably political practice and that transport planning research has to acknowledge the diversity of social positions when planning for equity and accessibility.

References

  1. Bacchi, C. L. (2009). Analysing policy: What’s the problem represented to be? Frenchs Forest: Pearson.Google Scholar
  2. Balkmar, D. (2012). On men and cars: An ethnographic study of gendered, risky and dangerous relations. Dissertation, Linköpings Universitet, Linköping.Google Scholar
  3. Banister, D. (2008). The sustainable mobility paradigm. Transport Policy, 15(2), 73–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barker, J., Kraftl, P., Horton, J., & Tucker, F. (2009). The road less travelled: New directions in children’s and young people’s mobility. Mobilities, 4(1), 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Berg, J., Levin, L., Abrahamsson, M., & Hagberg, J. (2014). Mobility in the transition to retirement: The intertwining of transportation and everyday projects. Journal of Transport Geography, 38, 48–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brown, B., Mackett, R., Gong, Y., Kitazawa, K., & Paskins, J. (2008). Gender differences in children’s pathways to independent mobility. Children’s Geographies, 6(4), 385–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Butler, J. (2006). Performative acts and gender constitution: An essay in phenomenology and feminist theory. In The RoutledgeFalmer reader in gender & education (pp. 73–83). London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Cockburn, C., & Omrod, S. (1993). Gender in the microwave world. In Gender and technology in the making (pp. 41–74). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  9. Dobbs, L. (2007). Stuck in the slow lane: Reconceptualizing the links between gender, transport and employment. Gender, Work & Organization, 14(2), 85–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Eliasson, K., Westerlund, O., & Åström, J. (2007). Flyttning och pendling i Sverige. Stockholm: Fritze.Google Scholar
  11. Fainstein, S. S., & Servon, L. J. (2005). Gender and planning: A reader. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Florida, R. (2005). Cities and the creative class. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Forsberg, G., & Lindgren, G. (2010). Nätverk och skuggstrukturer i regionalpolitiken. Karlstad: Karlstad University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Friberg, T. (2008). Det uppsplittrade rummet: regionförstoring i ett genusperspektiv. Regionalpolitikens geografi: regional tillväxt i teori och praktik. In F. Andersson, R. E., & I. Molina (Eds.), Regionalpolitikens geografi: regional tillväxt i teori och praktik (pp. 257–283). 1. uppl. Lund: Studentlitteratur.Google Scholar
  15. Fyhri, A., Hjorthol, R., Mackett, R. L., Fotel, T. N., & Kyttä, M. (2011). Children’s active travel and independent mobility in four countries: Development, social contributing trends and measures. Transport Policy, 18(5), 703–710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gil Solá, A. (2013). På väg mot jämställda arbetsresor: vardagens mobilitet i förändring och förhandling. Dissertation, Göteborgs Universitet, Göteborg.Google Scholar
  17. Hanson, S. (2010). Gender and mobility: New approaches for informing sustainability. Gender, Place & Culture, 17(1), 5–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hanson, S., & Pratt, G. J. (1995). Gender, work, and space (1st ed.). London [u.a.]: Routledge.Google Scholar
  19. Healey, P. (2006). Urban complexity and spatial strategies: Towards a relational planning for our times. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hemmings, C. (2005). Telling feminist stories. Feminist Theory, 6(2), 115–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hull, A. (2008). Policy integration: What will it take to achieve more sustainable transport solutions in cities? Transport Policy, 15(2), 94–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Joelsson, T. (2013). Space and sensibility: Young men’s risk-taking with motor vehicles. Dissertation, Linköpings Universitet, Linköping.Google Scholar
  23. Kębłowski, W., & Bassens, D. (2018). “All transport problems are essentially mathematical”: The uneven resonance of academic transport and mobility knowledge in Brussels. Urban Geography, 39(3), 413–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Koglin, T. (2015). Velomobility and the politics of transport planning. GeoJournal, 80(4), 569–586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Latour, B. (1993). We have never been modern. New York/London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
  26. Law, R. (1999). Beyond ‘women and transport’: Towards new geographies of gender and daily mobility. Progress in Human Geography, 23(4), 567–588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Legacy, C. (2016). Transforming transport planning in the postpolitical era. Urban Studies, 53(14), 3108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Levin, L. (2008). Äldre kvinnor: osynliga i statistiken men närvarande i trafiken. In M. Brusman, T. Friberg, & J. Summerton (Eds.), Resande, planering, makt (pp. 23–40). Lund: Arkiv.Google Scholar
  29. Levin, L., & Faith-Ell, C. (2011). Women and men in public consultations of road-building projects. Transportation Research Board Conference Proceedings.Google Scholar
  30. Levin, L., Faith-Ell, C., Scholten, C., Aretun, Å., Halling, J., & Thoresson, K. (2016). Att integrera jämställdhet i länstransportplanering: Slutredovisning av forskningsprojektet Implementering av metod för jämställdhetskonsekvensbedömning (JKB) i svensk transportinfrastrukturplanering. Lund: K2.Google Scholar
  31. Levy, C. (2013a). Transport, diversity and the socially just city: The significance of gender relations. DPU, UCL & Universidad Nacional de Colombia (Medelln Campus).Google Scholar
  32. Levy, C. (2013b). Travel choice reframed: ‘Deep distribution’ and gender in urban transport. Environment and Urbanization, 25(1), 47–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lindkvist Scholten, C., & Jönsson, S. (2010). Freedom of choice?: About long-distant commuters and employers approach to the effects of regional enlargement. Växjö: Växjö University, Department of Social Sciences.Google Scholar
  34. Listerborn, C. (2007). Who speaks? And who listens? The relationship between planners and women’s participation in local planning in a multi-cultural urban environment. GeoJournal, 70(1), 61–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lucas, K. (2004). Running on empty: Transport, social exclusion and environmental justice. Oxford/Chicago: Policy Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lucas, K. (2012). Transport and social exclusion: Where are we now? Transport Policy, 20, 105–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lykke, N. (2009). Genusforskning – en guide till feministisk teori, metodologi och skrift. Stockholm: Liber.Google Scholar
  38. Lykke, N., & Braidotti, R. (Eds.). (1996). Between monsters goddesses and cyborgs: Feminist confrontations with science, medicine and cyberspace. London: Zed.Google Scholar
  39. Martens, K. (2016). Transport justice: Designing fair transportation systems. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Matrix (Organization). (1984). Making space: Women and the man-made environment. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
  41. May, A. D., Page, M., & Hull, A. (2008). Developing a set of decision-support tools for sustainable urban transport in the UK. Transport Policy, 15(6), 328–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Mouffe, C. (2005). The return of the political. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  43. Mouffe, C. (2013). Agonistics: Thinking the world politically. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  44. Oliver, K. (1988). Women’s accessibility and transport policy in Britain. In S. Whatmore & J. Little (Eds.), Gender and geography (pp. 19–34). London: Association for Curriculum Development.Google Scholar
  45. Regionalpolitiska utredningens slutbetänkande. (2000). Stockholm: Fritzes offentliga publikationer.Google Scholar
  46. Rosenbloom, S. (2005). Women’s travel issues. In S. S. Fainstein & L. J. Servon (Eds.), Gender and planning: A reader. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  47. Rubin, G. (1975). The Traffic in women. In R. R. Reiter (Ed.), Toward an anthropology of women (p. 157). New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
  48. Salon, D., & Gulyani, S. (2010). Mobility, poverty, and gender: Travel ‘choices’ of slum residents in Nairobi, Kenya. Transport Reviews, 30(5), 641–657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Scholten, C., Friberg, T., & Sandén, A. (2012). Re-reading time-geography from a gender perspective: Examples from gendered mobility. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 103(5), 584–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Schwanen, T., Kwan, M., & Ren, F. (2008). How fixed is fixed? Gendered rigidity of space–time constraints and geographies of everyday activities. Geoforum, 39, 2109–2121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Sheller, M. (2012). Mobilities. In The Wiley-Blackwell encyclopedia of globalization. Chichester/Malden: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
  52. Uteng, T. P., & Cresswell, T. (2008). Gendered mobilities: Towards an holistic understanding. In T. P. Uteng & T. Cresswell (Eds.), Gendered mobilities (pp. 15–26). London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  53. Wajcman, J. (2010). Feminist theories of technology. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 34(1), 143–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. West, C., & Zimmerman, D. H. (1987). Doing gender. Gender & Society, 1(2), 125–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Wolff, J. (1993). On the road again: Metaphors of travel in cultural criticism. Cultural Studies, 7(2), 224–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tanja Joelsson
    • 1
    Email author
  • Christina Lindkvist Scholten
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of EducationUppsala UniversityUppsalaSweden
  2. 2.Malmö UniversityMalmöSweden
  3. 3.K2 – Swedish Knowledge Centre for Public TransportLundSweden

Personalised recommendations