Advertisement

A New Approach to Sustainable and Responsible Investment: The Sustainability-Themed Mutual Funds

  • Federica Ielasi
  • Monica Rossolini
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Impact Finance book series (SIF)

Abstract

This research analyzes the risk-adjusted returns and the investment style of sustainability-themed funds, a fast-growing category of sustainable and responsible mutual fund. Sustainability-themed funds are compared with sustainable and responsible mutual funds that implement different approaches in portfolio selection and management, and with thematic funds not involved in responsible investment strategies. The study uses a European sample of 1512 mutual funds where 468 are sustainability-themed funds, 633 are other sustainable and responsible funds, and 411 thematic funds. Monthly performance and fund characteristics are analyzed for the period 2007–2017 using a single factor Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM), a Fama and French (1993) 3-factor model, and, lastly, a Fama and French (Journal of Financial Economics, 116: 1–22, 2015) 5-factor model. The analysis is extremely innovative. During the last 15 years, literature about sustainable and responsible investment has focused on the differences in terms of risk and performance between socially responsible and conventional funds. Starting from the methodology applied in previous studies, and in light of their exponential growth in recent years, this paper focuses on sustainability-themed mutual funds. We demonstrate that sustainability-themed funds differ in terms of risk, performance, and investment style from other funds that implement social responsible strategies and from thematic funds focusing on a specific theme, but not responsible investment.

Keywords

SRI Responsible mutual funds Thematic funds Sustainability-themed funds Performance measures 

References

  1. Bauer, R., Derwall, J., & Otten, O. (2007). The ethical mutual fund performance debate: New evidence from Canadam. Journal of Business Ethics, 70, 111–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bauer, R., Koedijk, K., & Otten, R. (2005). International evidence on ethical mutual fund performance and investet style. Journal of Banking & Finance, 29, 1751–1767.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Becchetti, L., & Fucito, L. (2000). La finanza etica: Considerazioni teoriche e simulazioni empiriche. Quaderni CEIS, 108, 29–67.Google Scholar
  4. Bello, Z. Y. (2005). Socially responsible investing and portfolio diversification. The Journal of Financial Research, 28(1), 41–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Benson, K. L., Brailsford, T. J., & Humphrey, J. E. (2006). Do socially responsible funds managers really invest differently? Journal of Business Ethics, 65, 337–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bernett, M., & Salomon, R. (2006). Beyond dichotomy: The curvilinear relationship between social responsibility and financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 27(11), 1101–1122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bérubé, V., Ghal, S., & Tétrault, J. (2015). From index to insight: The rise of thematic investing. McKinsey on Investing, 1(Winter), 1–7.Google Scholar
  8. CBI. (2016). Bonds and climate change. State of the Market Report.Google Scholar
  9. Chan, L. K. C., Jegadeesh, N., & Lakonishok, J. (1996). Momentum strategies. Journal of Finance, 51(5), 1681–1713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chen, J., Hong, H., Hung, M., & Kubic, J. D. (2004). Does fund size erode mutual fund performance? The role of liquidity and organization. The American Economic Review, 94(5), 1276–1302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cohen, M., Fenn, S., & Konar, S. (1997, April). Environmental and financial performance: Are they related? Investor Responsibility Research Center Working Paper.Google Scholar
  12. D’Antonio, L., Johnsen, T., & Hutton, B. (1997). Expanding socially screened portfolios: An attribution analysis of bond performance. Journal of Investing, 6(4), 79–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Das, P. K., & Rao, S. U. (2014). Performance persistence in socially responsible mutual funds. International Journal of Economics and Business Research, 8(4), 490–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Diltz, J. D. (1995). Does social screening affect portfolio performance? Journal of Investing, 4(1), 64–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. ESRB. (2016, February). Too late, too sudden: Transition to a low-carbon economy and systemic risk. Advisory Scientific Committee Report.Google Scholar
  16. Eurosif. (2016). European SRI Study. Brussels.Google Scholar
  17. Fama, E., & French, K. (1993, February). Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds. Journal of Financial Economics, 33(1), 3–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fama, E., & French, K. R. (1996). Multifactor explanations of asset pricing anomalies. Journal of Finance, 51(1), 55–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fama, E., & French, K. (2015, April). A five-factor asset pricing model. Journal of Financial Economics, 116(1), 1–22. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Filbeck, G., & Gorman, R. (2004). The relationship between the environmental and financial performance of public utilities. Environmental & Resource Economics, 29, 137–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Financial Standard. (2009). Financial standard guide to thematic investing. Guide Series, 5(1), 1–24.Google Scholar
  22. Global Sustainable Investment Alliance (GSIA). (2017). Global Sustainable Investment Review 2016, Bloomberg, US, 1–31.Google Scholar
  23. Goldreyer, E. F., Ahmed, P., & Diltz, J. D. (1999). The performance of socially responsible mutual funds: Incorporating sociopolitical information in portfolio selection. Managerial Finance, 25(1), 23–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gregory, A., Matatko, J., & Luther, R. (1997). Ethical unit trust financial performance: Small company effects and fund size effects. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 24(5), 705–725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Grossmann, B., & Sharpe, W. (1986). Financial implication of South Africa divestment. Financial Analysts Journal, 42(4), 15–29. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hamilton, S., Jo, H., & Statman, M. (1993). Doing well while doing good? The investment performance of socially responsible mutual funds. Financial Analysts Journal, 49(6), 62–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hudson, R. (2005). Ethical investing: Ethical investors and managers. Business Ethics Quarterly, 15(4), 641–657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Huij, J., & Verbeek, M. (2009). On the use of multifactor models to evaluate mutual fund performance. Financial Management, 38(1), 75–102. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Imbens, G. (2004). Nonparametric estimation of average treatment effects under exogeneity: A review. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 86(1), 4–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. In, F., Kim, M., Park, R. J., Kim, S., & Kim, T. S. (2014). Competition of socially responsible and conventional mutual funds and its impact on fund performance. Journal of Banking & Finance, 44, 160–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Jensen, M. (1968). Problems in selection of security portfolios, the performance of mutual funds in the period 1945–1964. The Journal of Finance, 23, 389–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kaufman, L., & Rousseeuw, P. J. (2009). Finding groups in data: An introduction to cluster analysis. Hoboken, New Jersey: Wiley.Google Scholar
  33. Kreander, N., Gray, R. H., Power, D. M., & Sinclair, C. D. (2005). Evaluating the performance of ethical and non-ethical funds: A matched pair analysis. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 32(7–8), 1465–1493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kurtz, L. (1997). The impact of social screening on growth-oriented investment strategies. The Journal of Performance Measurement, Spring, 65–71. Google Scholar
  35. Lulewicz-Sas, A., & Kilon, J. (2014). Analysis of the effectiveness of socially responsible investment funds in Poland. Economics and Management, 19(4), 338–345. Google Scholar
  36. Luther, R., Matatko, J., & Corner, D. (1992). The investment performance of UK ‘ethical’ unit trust. Accounting, Audit and Accountability Journal, 5, 57–70.Google Scholar
  37. Mackenzie, C., & Lewis, A. (1999). Moral and markets: The case of ethical investing. Business Ethics Quarterly, 9(3), 439–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Mallin, C. A., Saadouni, B., & Briston, R. J. (1995). The financial performance of ethical investment funds. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 22(4), 483–496. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Markowitz, H. M. (1952). Portfolio selection. The Journal of Financial, 7(1), 77–91.Google Scholar
  40. Markowitz, H. M. (1991). Portfolio selection: Efficient diversification of investment. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  41. Moskowitz, M. (1972). Choosing socially responsible stock. Business and Society Review, 1, 71–75.Google Scholar
  42. Msci website. (2018). www.msci.com.
  43. Nicholls, M. (2015, February). Special report ESG: Carbon risk, a changing climate. IPE.Google Scholar
  44. Pasali, S. S. (2013, October). Where is the cheese? Synthesizing a giant literature on causes and consequences of financial sector development (World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 6655). Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
  45. Reilley, F., & Norton, E. (2006). Investment (7th ed.). Toronto: Thomson South-Western.Google Scholar
  46. Renneboog, L., Ter Horst, J., & Zhang, C. (2008a). Socially responsible investments: Institutional aspects, performance, and investor behaviour. Journal of Banking & Finance, 32, 1723–1742.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Renneboog, L., Ter Horst, J., & Zhang, C. (2008b). The price of ethics and stakeholder governance: The performance of socially responsible mutual funds. Journal of Corporate Finance, 14, 302–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Rudd, A. (1979). Divestment of South Africa equities: How risky? Journal of Portfolio Management, 5(3), 5–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Rudd, A. (1981). Social responsibility and portfolio performance. California Management Review, 23(4), 55–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Sanchez, J. L. F., & Sotorrio, L. L. (2010). Performance of European ETI funds vs. conventional funds. Conference paper: IV Encuentro AECA ‘Inovacio y responsabilidad: desafios y soluciones’.Google Scholar
  51. Sauer, D. A. (1997). The impact of social-responsibility screens on investment performance: Evidence from the Domini 400 social index and Domini Equity Mutual Fund. Review of Financial Economics, 6(2), 137–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Scholtens, B. (2005). What drives socially responsible investment? The case of Netherlands. Sustainable Development, 13, 129–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Sharpe, W. F. (1966). Mutual fund performance. The Journal of Business, 39(1), 119–138. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Statman, M. (2000). Socially responsible mutual funds. Financial Analyst Journal, 56(3), 30–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Towers Watson. (2012). Thematic investing. London. Google Scholar
  56. Vigeo Eiris Rating. (2016, October). Green, social and ethical funds in Europe. 2016 release.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Economics and ManagementUniversity of FlorenceFlorenceItaly
  2. 2.Department of Business and LawUniversity of Milano-BicoccaMilanItaly

Personalised recommendations