Advertisement

Sustainable and Responsible Investments: Same Sea, Different Fishes?

  • Alberto BurchiEmail author
  • Duccio Martelli
  • Paola Musile Tanzi
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Impact Finance book series (SIF)

Abstract

The current international economic scenario, long characterized by interest rates close to zero and a higher positive correlation between traditional investment solutions, has persuaded retail and professional investors to rethink their investment strategies and to consider alternative investment solutions. The appeal of specific investments, combining financial returns and social wellness, is increasing. Such a strategy, which seeks to achieve both goals, is generally called sustainable and responsible investing or socially responsible investment (SRI). This paper attempts to answer two research questions: (1) What are the SRI risk-return trade-offs over different time horizons? and (2) Is SRI able to meet investors’ needs, to reduce risk without a negative impact on returns? Preliminary results show that SRI is not completely different from the others investment opportunity, but in a portfolio view, SRI produces benefits for investors.

Keywords

Socially responsible investment (SRI) Risk-Return trade-off Portfolio optimization 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The Authors benefited from the many fruitful discussions with prof. Marco Nicolosi (University of Perugia, Italy), the discussion at the “Social Impact Investments International Conference”, organized by Sapienza University of Rome (Italy) on October 12, 2017, the suggestions from the anonymous reviewers and prof. Mario La Torre (Sapienza University, Rome). The views expressed are entirely personal and any remaining errors are solely the authors’ responsibility. The research is part of the project “Impact analysis of socially responsible investments on systemic risk” (code 2017.0226.021) funded by Fondazione Cassa di Risparmio di Perugia.

References

  1. Acerbi, C., & Tasche, D. (2002). Expected shortfall: A natural coherent alternative to value at risk. Economic Notes, 31(2), 379–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Amenc, N., & Le Sourd, V. (2008). Socially responsible investment performance in France. In EDHEC risk and asset management research centre.Google Scholar
  3. Andersson, F., Mausser, H., Rosen, D., & Uryasev, S. (2001). Credit risk optimization with conditional value-at-risk criterion. Mathematical Programming, 89(2), 273–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Artzner, P., Delbaen, F., Eber, J.-M., & Heath, D. (1997). Thinking coherently: Generalised scenarios rather than VAR should be used when calculating regulatory capital. Risk, 10, 68–71.Google Scholar
  5. Barnett, M. L., & Salomon, R. M. (2006). Beyond dichotomy: The curvilinear relationship between social responsibility and financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 27(11), 1101–1122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bauer, R., Derwall, J., & Otten, R. (2007). The ethical mutual fund performance debate: New evidence from Canada. Journal of Business Ethics, 70(2), 111–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bauer, R., Koedijk, K., & Otten, R. (2005). International evidence on ethical mutual fund performance and investment style. Journal of Banking & Finance, 29(7), 1751–1767.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Belghitar, Y., Clark, E., & Deshmukh, N. (2014, October). Does it pay to be ethical? Evidence from the FTSE4Good. Journal of Banking & Finance, 47, 54–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bello, Z. Y. (2005). Socially responsible investing and portfolio diversification. Journal of Financial Research, 28(1), 41–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Calvo, C., Ivorra, C., & Liern, V. (2015, July). Finding socially responsible portfolios close to conventional ones. International Review of Financial Analysis, 40, 52–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chekhlov, A., Uryasev, S., & Zabarankin, M. (2004). Portfolio optimization with drawdown constraints. In Supply chain and finance (pp. 209–228). Singapore: World Scientific.Google Scholar
  12. Derwall, J., Koedijk, K., & Ter Horst, J. (2011). A tale of values-driven and profit-seeking social investors. Journal of Banking & Finance, 35(8), 2137–2147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dorfleitner, G., Halbritter, G., & Nguyen, M. (2015). Measuring the level and risk of corporate responsibility—An empirical comparison of different ESG rating approaches. Journal of Asset Management, 16(7), 450–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Duffie, D., & Pan, J. (1997). An overview of value at risk. The Journal of Derivatives, 4(3), 7–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. El Ghoul, S., & Karoui, A. (2017, April). Does corporate social responsibility affect mutual fund performance and flows? Journal of Banking & Finance, 77, 53–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fabretti, A., & Herzel, S. (2013). Active management of socially responsible portfolios. In Entrepreneurship, finance, governance and ethics (pp. 213–236). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  17. Hamilton, S., Jo, H., & Statman, M. (1993). Doing well while doing good? The investment performance of socially responsible mutual funds. Financial Analysts Journal, 49(6), 62–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Herzel, S., Nicolosi, M., & Starica, C. (2011). The cost of sustainability on optimal portfolio choices. European Journal of Finance, 18(3–4), 333–349.Google Scholar
  19. Hong, H., & Kacperczyk, M. (2009). The price of sin: The effects of social norms on markets. Journal of Financial Economics, 93(1), 15–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jorion, P. (1997). Value at risk: The new benchmark for controlling market risk. Chicago: Irwin Professional. http://www.worldcat.org/title/value-at-risk-the-new-benchmark-for-controlling-market-risk/oclc/34658858.
  21. Kempf, A., & Osthoff, P. (2007). The effect of socially responsible investing on portfolio performance. European Financial Management, 13(5), 908–922.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Krokhmal, P. A., Uryasev, S. P., & Zrazhevsky, G. M. (2001). Comparative analysis of linear portfolio rebalancing strategies: An application to hedge funds. University of Florida ISE research report (2001–11).Google Scholar
  23. Kurtz, L. (1997). No effect, or no net effect? Studies on socially responsible investing. The Journal of Investing, 6(4), 37–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lee, D. D., & Faff, R. W. (2009). Corporate sustainability performance and idiosyncratic risk: A global perspective. Financial Review, 44(2), 213–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mill, G. A. (2006). The financial performance of a socially responsible investment over time and a possible link with corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 63(2), 131–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Rockafellar, R. T., & Uryasev, S. (2000). Optimization of conditional value-at-risk. Journal of Risk, 2(3), 21–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Rockafellar, R. T., & Uryasev, S. (2002). Conditional value-at-risk for general loss distributions. Journal of Banking & Finance, 26(7), 1443–1471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Schröder, M. (2004). The performance of socially responsible investments: Investment funds and indices. Financial Markets and Portfolio Management, 18(2), 122–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Schröder, M. (2007). Is there a difference? The performance characteristics of SRI equity indices. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 34(1–2), 331–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Statman, M. (2000). Socially responsible mutual funds. Financial Analysts Journal, 56(3), 30–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Statman, M. (2006). Socially responsible indexes. The Journal of Portfolio Management, 32(3), 100–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Utz, S., & Wimmer, M. (2014). Are they any good at all? A financial and ethical analysis of socially responsible mutual funds. Journal of Asset Management, 15(1), 72–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alberto Burchi
    • 1
    Email author
  • Duccio Martelli
    • 1
  • Paola Musile Tanzi
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.University of PerugiaPerugiaItaly
  2. 2.SDA BocconiMilanItaly

Personalised recommendations