Advertisement

Displacement, Loss and Enclosure of the Commons: The Role of the Dutch East India Company

Potential of the Double Hermeneutic for Re-framing Epistemic Governance
  • Janet McIntyre-MillsEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Contemporary Systems Thinking book series (CST)

Abstract

Giddens stressed in The Consequences of Modernity that trust is contingent and that risks escalate when transfers are disembedded from local contexts. This paper concentrates on the need to develop policy and praxis to protect the commons through a critical and systemic approach drawing on history, sociology and anthropology. The paper explores Inglehart’s (Modernization and postmodernization: cultural, economic and political change in 43 societies, Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1997) notion of culture shift, Norvey et al.’s (International Sociology 32(6): 683–706, 2017) reflections on Inglehart’s thesis and Gidden’s (The consequences of modernity, Stanford University Press, Palo Alto, 1990) essay on the The Consequences of Modernity. The paper discusses how the potential for transformation rests with people who can bring about transformation of taken for granted epistemic policy networks that use so-called root metaphors to shape ‘what is inevitable’. Instead, the case is made through critical reflection to reconstruct narratives about current challenges that are framed in terms of the capability approach (Nussbaum, Creating capabilities: the human development approach, The Belknap Press, London, 2011). The paper underlines the importance of research to reframe concepts from above and below to protect and restore the commons. The paper responds to the cascading risks and consequences of modernity and makes a case for a new nonanthropocentric narrative based on our interconnectedness and shared fate. The containerist approach is critiqued by tracing the archetypes that have shaped history. The epistemic policies shaped a culture of profit. The paper explores the dualism, racism and speciesism that has underpinned the way in which governance has been framed. It makes a case for a new narrative based on sharing and reciprocity based on our shared fate. There is no ‘Planet B’ as Macron summed up recently in an address on a state visit to the USA (Macron, There is no Planet B. Address to United States Congress on 25th April, 2018).

Keywords

Consequences of modernity Cascading Risk Connections Double hermeneutic Trust Regeneration 

References

  1. Anderson, J. (2017). Nature’s new ambassador: A conversation with Christiana Figueres. https://blog.conservation.org/2017/03/natures-new-ambassador-a-conversation-with-christiana-figueres/
  2. Alasusuutari, P., & Qadir, A. (2016). Imageries of the social world in epistemic governance. International Sociology, 31(6), 633–652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alexander, P. (2010). Rebellion of the poor: South Africa’s service delivery protests: A preliminary analysis. Review of African Political Economy, 37(123), 25–40.  https://doi.org/10.1080/03056241003637870.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bacchi, C. (2009). Analysing policy. In What is the problem represented to be? Sydney: Pearson.Google Scholar
  5. Beck, U. (1992). Risk society towards a new modernity. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  6. Beck, U. (1998). Democracy without enemies. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  7. Beck, U. (2005). World risk society. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  8. Beck, U. (2010). Climate for change, or how to create a green modernity. Theory, Culture and Society, 27(2–3), 254–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bignall, S., Hemming, S., & Rigney, D. (2016). Three ecosophies for the anthropocene: Environmental governance, continental post humanism and indigenous expressivism. Deleuze Studies, 10, 455–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bogue, R. (1989). Deleuze and Guattari. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  11. Bollier, D., & Helfrich, S. (2012). The commons strategies group. Amherst: Levellers Press. Discussion paper no. 11.Google Scholar
  12. Bond, P. (2012). Politics of climate justice: Paralysis above, movement below. Durban: KZN Press.Google Scholar
  13. Bond, P., & Garcia, A. (2015). An anti-capitalist critique. London: Pluto.Google Scholar
  14. Bond, P., & Mottiar, S. (2013). Movements, protests and a massacre in South Africa. Journal of Contemporary African Studies, 31(2), 283–302.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02589001.2013.789727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bostrom, N. (2011). Existential risk prevention as the most important task for humanity. Faculty of Philosophy and Oxford Martin School University of Oxford; Available at: www.existential risk.org.
  16. Boulding, K. (1956). General systems theory—The skeleton of science. Management Science, 2, 197–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Boulding, K. (1966). The Economics of the Coming Spaceship Earth. In H. Jarrett (Ed.), Environmental quality in a growing economy (pp. 3–14). Baltimore: Resources for the Future/Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Bradlow, D. (2017). BRICS needs a new approach if it’s going to foster a more equitable global order. Retrieved February 18, 2014, from https://theconversation.com/brics-needs-a-new-approach-if-its-going-to-foster-a-more-equitable-global-order-84229
  19. Churchman, C. W. (1979). The systems approach and its enemies. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  20. Churchman, C. W. (1982). Thought and wisdom. California: Intersystems Publications.Google Scholar
  21. Cram, F., & Mertens, D. M. (2015). Transformative and indigenous frameworks for multimethod and mixed methods research. In S. Hesse-Biber & B. Johnson (Eds.), The oxford handbook of multimethods and mixed methods research inquiry (pp. 91–110). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Cruz, I., Stahel, A., & Max-Neef, M. (2009). Towards a systemic development approach: Building on the human scale development paradigm. Ecological Economics, 68(7), 2021–2030.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Dirk, N. (2017). Help rush water, animal feed to drought areas. Retrieved from https://www.iol.co.za/capetimes/news/help-rush-water-animal-feed-to-drought-areas-1968817
  24. Dobson, A. (2007). Environmental citizenship: Towards sustainable development. Sustainable Development, 15, 276–285. Retrieved from www.interscience.wiley.com.  https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Dobson, A., & Eckersley, R. (2006). Political theory and the ecological challenge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Retrieved August 10, 2006—Political Science.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Donaldson, S., & Kymlicka, W. (2011). Zoopolis: A political theory of animal rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Flannery, T. (2012). After the future: Australia’s new extinction crisis. Quarterly Essay, Issue 48.Google Scholar
  28. Flood, R., & Carson, E. (1993). Dealing with complexity: An introduction to the theory and application of systems science (2nd ed.). London: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Flyvbjerg, B. (1998). Habermas and Foucault. British Journal of Society, 49(2), 200–232.Google Scholar
  30. Foucault, M., & Gordon, C. (Eds.). (1980). Power/Knowledge. Brighton: Harvester.Google Scholar
  31. Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., et al. (1994). The new production of knowledge. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  32. Gibson-Graham, J. K., & Miller, E. (2015). Economy as ecological livelihood. In K. Gibson, D. Bird Rose, & R. Fincher (Eds.), Manifesto for living in the anthropocene. New York: Punctum books.Google Scholar
  33. Giddens, A. (1990). The consequences of modernity. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Giddens, A. (2000). The third way and its critics. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  35. Giddens, A. (2009). The politics of climate change. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  36. Haraway, D. (1991). Cyborgs, simians, and women: The reinvention of nature. London: Free Association Books.Google Scholar
  37. Haraway, D. (2016). Anthropocene, Capitalocene, Chthulucene: Making string figures with biologies, arts, activisms – Aarhus University YouTube https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=CHwZA9NGWg0
  38. Harper, S. (2016). How population change will transform our world. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Held, D. (2004). Global covenant: The social democratic alternative to the Washington consensus. London: Polity.Google Scholar
  40. Hesse-Biber, S. (2010). Qualitative approaches to mixed methods practice. http://qix.sagepub.com/
  41. Keane, J. (2009). The life and death of democracy. London: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  42. Inglehart, R. (1990). Culture shift in advanced industrial society. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Inglehart, R. (1997). Modernization and postmodernization: Cultural, economic and political change in 43 societies. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Maathai, W. (2004). The Green Belt movement. New York: Lantern Books.Google Scholar
  45. Macron, E. (2018). There is no Planet B. Address to United States Congress on 25th April. Retrieved August 27, 2018, from https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=qqHlUXi2i7s
  46. Marella, M. R. (2017). The commons as a legal concept. Law Critique, 28, 61–86.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10978-016-9193-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. McIntyre-Mills, J. (2006). Systemic governance and accountability: Working and re-working the conceptual and spatial boundaries of international relations and governance (C. West Churchman and related works series) (Vol. 3). London: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. McIntyre-Mills, J (2017). Recognising our hybridity and interconnectedness: implications for social and environmental justice’. Current Sociology 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392117715898.
  49. McIntyre-Mills, J., De Vries, D., & Binchai, N. (2014). Transformation from wall street to wellbeing. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. McIntyre-Mills, J., Romm, N., & Corcoran-Nantes, Y. (Eds.). (2017). Balancing individualism and collectivism: Supporting social and environmental justice. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  51. Mertens, D. M. (2009). Transformative research and evaluation. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  52. Mertens, D. (2016). Assumptions at the philosophical and programmatic levels in evaluation. Evaluation and Program Planning, 59, 102–108.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2016.05.010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Mertens, D., Cram, F., & Chilisa, B. (Eds.). (2013). Indigenous pathways into social research in indigenous research methodologies. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  54. Midgley, G. (2000). Systemic intervention: Philosophy, methodology, and practice. New York: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Morton, F. (2017). Cultural history, slavery and slave trade, Southern Africa. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of African History.  https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190277734.013.77.
  56. Norvey, M., Smithy, M., & Katrnak, T. (2017). Inglehart’s scarcity hypothesis revisited: Is post materialism a macro or micro-level phenomenon around the world? International Sociology, 32(6), 683–706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Nussbaum, M. (2006). Frontiers of justice. London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  58. Nussbaum, M. (2011). Creating capabilities: The human development approach. London: The Belknap Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Pauli, G. (2010). The blue economy: Report to the club of Rome. New Mexico: Paradigm Publications.Google Scholar
  60. Purwanto, R. B. S. A. (2018). Bureaucratic and governance issues in Bandung. IOP Conference Series. Earth and Environmental Science, 145, 012092.Google Scholar
  61. Rittel, H., & Webber, M. (1984). Planning problems are wicked problems: Developments in design methodology. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  62. Romer, P. (2009). Why the world needs charter cities. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mSHBma0Ithk. Accessed 20 Mar 2019.
  63. Rose, D. B. (2005). Dislocating the Frontier. Retrieved from http://epress.anu.edu.au/dtf/html/frames.php see http://epress.anu.edu.au
  64. Salleh, A. (2016). The anthropocene: Thinking in “Deep Geological Time” or Deep Libidinal Time? International Critical Thought, 6(3), 422–433.  https://doi.org/10.1080/21598282.2016.1197784.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Sen, A. (2000). Development as freedom. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
  66. Shiva, V. (2012). Making peace with the earth. Winipeg: Fernwood.Google Scholar
  67. Smith, A. (1776a). The Wealth of Nations. Retrieved from http://political-economy.com/wealth-of-nations-adam-smith/to engage comments
  68. Smith, A. (1776b). The Wealth of Nations, Bantam Classic, edited 2003; with notes and summary by Edwin Cannan; preface by Alan B. Kruege. Cited by Branko’s blog.
  69. Stern, N. (2007). The economics of climate change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Stiglitz, J., Sen, A., & Fitoussi, J. P. (2010). Mis-measuring our lives: Why the GDP doesn’t add up. New York: The New Press.Google Scholar
  71. Taylor, S. (2017). Defiance: The life and choices of Lady-Anne Barnard. London: Faber and Faber.Google Scholar
  72. The National Water Act. (1998). Cited in department of water affairs and forestry, republic of South Africa. Water and sanitation business: The roles and responsibilities of local government and related institutions, dwa.gov.za.Google Scholar
  73. UN Habitat. (2016). Urbanisation and development: Emerging futures world cities report 2016. Retrieved from https://unhabitat.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/WCR-%20Full-Report-2016.pdf
  74. UNEP. (2014). Using indicators for green economy policymaking.Google Scholar
  75. Worden, N. (2017). Slavery at the Cape. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of African History.  https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190277734.013.77.
  76. Zapp, M. (2018). The scientization of the world polity: International organizations and the production of scientific knowledge, 1950–2015. International Sociology, 33(1), 306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Zille. (2012, 3rd Dec). Zille says the Cape Town rich-poor divide is narrowest in SA. https://africacheck.org/reports/zille-right-to-say-the-cape-town-richpoor-gap-is-narrowest-in-sa/.
  78. Zuijderduijn, J., & De Moor, T. (2013). Spending, saving, or investing? Risk management in sixteenth-century Dutch households. The Economic History Review, 66(1), 38–56. Online, 22 Dec 2011. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0289.2011.00626.xGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Flinders UniversityAdelaideAustralia

Personalised recommendations