Advertisement

Dynamic Weaving Together Strands of Experience: Multiple Mixed Methods Approaches to Resilience and Regeneration Based on Intra-, Inter- and Cross-Disciplinary Approaches

  • Janet McIntyre-MillsEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Contemporary Systems Thinking book series (CST)

Abstract

The collection of papers in this volume Mixed Methods and Cross-Disciplinary Research Towards Cultivating Eco-systemic Living and its companion volume Democracy and Governance for Resourcing the Commons: Theory and Practice on Rural-Urban Balance addresses health, development and social inclusion to enhance our understanding of how to manage complex needs based on mixed methods (Hesse-Biber, Qualitative approaches to mixed methods practice, 2010; Mertens et al., Indigenous pathways into social research, Left Coast Press, Walnut Creek, 2013; Mertens, Evaluation and Program Planning, 59, 102–108, 2016). It aims to critique governmentality (Foucault and Gordon, Power/knowledge, Harvester, Brighton, 1980) and the existing governance context for UN Sustainable Development Goals through exploring frontiers (Rose, Dislocating the frontier, 2005; Nussbaum, Frontiers of Justice, Harvard University Press, London, 2006), discourses (Bacchi, Analysing policy. What is the problem represented to be?, Pearson, New South Wales, 2009) and scenarios of different policy and practice. The links across greater equality and wellbeing and the prevention of global warming appear to involve ‘limiting consumerism’ and narrowing the gap in living standards between rich and poor (Wilkinson and Pickett, The spirit level, Allen Lane, London, 2009, 221). It is assumed that greater social and economic equality will provide the key to reducing the cultural pressure to consume at the expense of the majority in this generation and the next. In this chapter I offer some reflections on displacement and loss as experienced by first Indigenous nations in Australia, New Zealand, the USA, Canada and Guam in order to compare and contrast the approaches to citizenship and identity and its implications for state sovereignty.

Keywords

Food Water Systemic webs and flows 

References

  1. Ackoff, R. L., & Pourdehnand, J. (2001). On misdirected systems. Systems Research and Behavioural Science, 18(3), 199–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aguon, J. (2010). On loving the maps our hands cannot hold: Self-determination of colonized and indigenous peoples in International Law, 16 UCLA Asian Pac. Am. L.J. 47, 73.Google Scholar
  3. Alexander, S. (2011). The voluntary simplicity movement. The International Journal of Environmental, Cultural, Economic and Social Sustainability, 7(3), 133–150. Retrieved from http://www.Sustainability.
  4. Ashby, W. R. (1956). An introduction to cybernetics. London: Chapman and Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bacchi, C. (2009). Analysing policy. What is the problem represented to be? New South Wales: Pearson.Google Scholar
  6. Banathy, B. (1996). Designing social systems in a changing world. London: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bateson, G. (1972). Steps to an ecology of mind. New York: Ballantine.Google Scholar
  8. Battersby, J. (2012). Beyond the food desert: finding ways to speak about urban food security in South Africa. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography, 94(2), 141–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Battersby, J. (2017). MDGs to SDGs—New goals, same gaps: The continued absence of urban food security in the post-2015 global development agenda. African Geographical Review, 36, 115–129. Retrieved from http://hungrycities.net/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/HCP11.pdf.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Beck, U. (1992). Risk society: Towards a new modernity. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  11. Beck, U. (1998). Democracy without enemies. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  12. Beck, U. (2005). World risk society. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  13. Binkley, S. (2008). Liquid consumption anti-consumerism and the fetishizedde-fetishization of commodities. Cultural Studies, 22(5), 599–623.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09502380802245845.
  14. Bird Rose, D. (2005). Dislocating the frontier. Retrieved from http://epress.anu.edu.au/dtf/html/frames.php; http://epress.anu.edu.au
  15. Bogue, R. (1989). Deleuze and Guattari. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  16. Bollier, D., & Helfrich, S. (2012). The commons strategies group. Boston, MA: Levellers Press.Google Scholar
  17. Bostrom, N. 2011. Existential risk prevention as the most important task for humanity. Retrieved from www.existential-risk.orgGoogle Scholar
  18. Boulding, K. (1966). Space ship earth. The economics of the coming spaceship earth. In H. Jarrett (Ed.), Environmental quality in a growing economy (pp. 3–14). Baltimore: Resources for the Future.Google Scholar
  19. Burn, J., & Simmons, F. (2006). Trafficking and slavery in Australia: An evaluation of victim support strategies. Asian and Pacific Migration Journal, 15, 553–570. No. 4. Note the author is Burn and not Burns.Google Scholar
  20. Christakis, A., & Flanagan, T. (2010). The talking point: Collaborative project of Global Agoras. Information Age.Google Scholar
  21. Churchman, C. W. (1982). Thought and wisdom. Californian: Intersystems Publications.Google Scholar
  22. Cram, F. (2015). Harnessing global social justice and social change’. In S. Hesse-Biber & R. B. Johnson (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of multimethod and mixed methods research inquiry (pp. 677–687). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Crichtfield, R. (1978). Look to suffering, look to joy. Robert Redfield and Oscar Lewis re-studied. Retrieved from www.icwa.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/RC-6.pdf
  24. Crush, J., Riley, L. (2017). Urban food security and urban bias. Hungry Cities Partnership, Discussion Paper No 11.Google Scholar
  25. Cruz, I., Stahel, A., & Max-Neef, M. (2009). Towards a systemic development approach. Ecological Economics, 68, 2021–2030.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ehrlich, P. R., & Ehrlich, A. H. (2013). Can a collapse of global civilization be avoided? Proceedings of the Royal Society B 280: 20122845, 9 p. Retrieved May 29, 2015, from http://rspb.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/royprsb/280/1754/20122845.full.pdf.
  27. Ellis, E., Maslin, M., Boivin, N., & Bauer, A. (2016). Involve social scientists in defining the anthropocene. Nature, 540(7632), 192–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Finn, J. (2016). Human trafficking and natural disasters: Exploiting misery. International Affairs Review, 24, 80–99.Google Scholar
  29. Flanagan. (2017). Australia built a hell for refugees on Manus. The shame will outlive us all. Retrieved August 27, 2018, from https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2017/nov/24/the-shame-of-the-evil-being-done-on-manus-will-outlive-us-all
  30. Flood, R. L., & Romm, N. R. A. (2018). The Learning Organization, 25(4). DOI $$$.Google Scholar
  31. Florini, A. (2003). The coming democracy. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
  32. Foucault, M., & Gordon, C. (Eds.). (1980). Power/Knowledge. Brighton: Harvester.Google Scholar
  33. Gardner, H. (2008). Multiple intelligences: New horizons in theory and practice. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  34. Gardner, H. (2011). Multiple intelligences: New horizons in theory and practice. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  35. Geyer, R., Jambeck, J., & Law, K. (2017). Production, use, and fate of all plastics ever made. Science Advances. 3(7), e1700782.  https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1700782. Retrieved from http://advances.sciencemag.org/content/3/7/e1700782.abstract.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Gibson-Graham, J. K., & Miller, E. (2015). Economy as Ecological livelihood. In K. Gibson, D. Bird Rose, & R. Fincher (Eds.), Manifesto for living in the Anthropocene. New York: Punctum Books.Google Scholar
  37. Graham, M. (2008). Some thoughts on the philosophical underpinnings of Aboriginal worldviews. Australian Humanities Review, 45, 181–194.Google Scholar
  38. Greenfield, S. (2000). The private life of the brain: Emotions, consciousness and the secret of the self. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  39. Haraway, D. (1991). Cyborgs, simians, and women: The reinvention of nature. London: Free Association Books.Google Scholar
  40. Haraway, D. (2016). Anthropocene, capitalocene: Making string figures with biologies, arts, activisms. Aarhus University. YouTube https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=CHwZA9NGWg0.
  41. Haraway, D. (2014). String figures multispecies muddles, staying with the trouble. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ii3vuI-0614.
  42. Hardin, G. (1968). The tragedy of the commons. Science, 162, 1243–1248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Harper, S. (2016). How population change will transform our world. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Hay, I. M., & Beaverstock, J. (Eds.). (2016). Handbook on wealth and the Super-Rich. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  45. Held, D. (2004). Global covenant: The social democratic alternative to the Washington consensus. Oxford: Polity.Google Scholar
  46. Hesse-Biber, S. (2010). Qualitative approaches to mixed methods practice. Retrieved from http://qix.sagepub.com/content/16/6/455.
  47. Hesse-Biber, S. (2017). Sharlene Hesse-Biber Reflects on the Research Process.  https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473998209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Hesse-Biber, S., & Johnson, R. B. (2015). The Oxford handbook of multimethod and mixed methods research inquiry (pp. 677–687). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Hosgelen, M., & Saikia, U. (2014) Forest reliance as a livelihood strategy in Timor-Leste. In H. Loney, A. da Silva, N. Mendes, A. da Costa Ximenes, C. Fernandes, (Eds.) Proceedings of the Understanding Timor-Leste 2013 Conference. Timor-Leste Studies Association. Understanding Timor-Leste 2013. Dili, Timor-Leste 2013, pp. 66–73.Google Scholar
  50. Hulme, M. (2009). Why we disagree about climate change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  51. Jones, P. H. (2014). Systemic design principles for complex social systems. In G. Metcalf (Ed.), Social systems and design (pp. 91–128). Japan: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Kelly, C. (2017). Let us not squander the chance to make better history 26–27th Weekend Australian, page 22.Google Scholar
  53. Kovach, M. (2009). Indigenous methodologies: Characteristics, conversations, and contexts. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  54. Little and McMillan. (2016). On the wrong track: Why Australia’s attempt at indigenous reconciliation will fail. https://www.sbs.com.au/nitv/article/2016/05/20/wrong-track-why-australias-attempt-indigenous-reconciliation-will-fai.
  55. Maddison, S. (2016). Indigenous reconciliation in the US shows how sovereignty and constitutional recognition work together. In The conversation. https://theconversation.com/indigenous-reconciliation-in-the-us-shows-how-sovereignty-and-constitutional-recognition-work-together-54554.
  56. Mahmood, S., Wroe, E., Fuller, A., & Leaning, J. (2016). The Rohingya people of Myanmar: Health, human rights, and identity Lancet 389(10081):1841–1850  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00646-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Max-Neef, M. (1991). Human scale development. London: Apex.Google Scholar
  58. McDonough, W. A. (1992). The Hannover principles, design for sustainability, prepared for EXPO (p. 2000). Hannover, Germany: The World’s Fair.Google Scholar
  59. McIntyre-Mils, J. (2000). Global citizenship and social movements: Creating transcultural webs of meaning for the new millennium. The Netherlands: Harwood.Google Scholar
  60. McIntyre-Mills, J. (2003). Critical systemic praxis for social and environmental justice. London: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. McIntyre-Mills, J. (2004). Facilitating critical systemic praxis (CSP) by means of experiential learning and conceptual tools. Systems Research and Behavioural Science, 21, 37–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. McIntyre-Mills, J. (2006). Systemic governance and accountability (West Churchman Series) (Vol. 3). London: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. McIntyre-Mills, J. (2010). Wellbeing, mindfulness and the global commons. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 17(7–8), 44–72.Google Scholar
  64. McIntyre-Mills, J., & Van Gigch, J. (Eds.). (2006). Rescuing the enlightenment from itself: Critical and systemic implications for democracy (C. West Churchman Series) (Vol. 1). London.Google Scholar
  65. McIntyre-Mills, J. (2014). Systemic ethics and non-anthropocentric stewardship. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. McIntyre-Mills, J. (2017). Planetary passport. Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
  67. McIntyre-Mills, J., De Vries, D., & Binchai, N. (2014). Transformation from wall street to wellbeing. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. McIntyre-Mills, J., Romm, N., & Corcoran-Nantes, Y. (Eds.). (2017). Balancing individualism and collectivism. Contemporary systems thinking. Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
  69. Mertens, D. M. (2007). Transformative paradigm: Mixed methods and social justice. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(3), 212–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Mertens, D. M. (2010). Transformative mixed methods research. Qualitative Inquiry, 16(6), 469–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Mertens, D. (2016). Assumptions at the philosophical and programmatic levels in evaluation. Evaluation and Program Planning,  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2016.05.010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Mertens, D., Cram, F., & Chilisa, B. (Eds.). (2013). Indigenous pathways into social research. Left Coast Press, Inc.Google Scholar
  73. Midgley, G. (2017). Systems thinking for community involvement in public health and health service design. Plenary session, from science to systemic solutions: Systems thinking for everyone. International Systems Sciences, Vienna, July 12th.Google Scholar
  74. Midgley, G. (2001). Systems thinking for the 21st century. In Systems thinking for the 21st century (pp. 249–256). New York: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  75. Midgley, G., Ahuriri-Driscoll, A., Foote, J., Hepi, M., Taimona, H., Rogers-Koroheke, M., Baker, V., Gregor, J., Gregory, W., Lange, M., Veth, J., Winstanley, A., & Wood, D. (2007). Practitioner identity in systemic intervention: reflections on the promotion of environmental health through Māori community development. Systems Research, 24, 233–247.  https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.827.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Murray, J., Dey, C., & Lenzen, M. (2007). Systems for social sustainability. Cybernetics and Human Knowing, 14(1), 87–105.Google Scholar
  77. Nemoto, K. (2004). The Rohingya issue: A thorny obstacle between Burma (Myanmar) and Bangladesh. This information is based on the presentation given by Dr. M. Rahmatullha titled “Economic and Political Relations between Bangladesh and the Neighboring Countries” at the “Workshop on Sub-Regional Relations in the Eastern South Asia: with Special Focus on Bangladesh and Bhutan”, which was held on 26th January 2004 at the Institute of Developing Economies, Tokyo. http://www.burmalibrary.org/docs14/Kei_Nemoto-Rohingya.pdf
  78. Nussbaum, M. (2006). Frontiers of Justice. London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  79. Nussbaum, M. (2011). Creating capabilities: The human development approach. London: The Belknap Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. O’Donnell, K. (2017). Indigenous Public Policy Intensive held at Flinders University, personal communication.Google Scholar
  81. Paris Agenda (1997, 2005). Retrieved August 26, 2018, from http://www.oecd.org/dac/effectiveness/parisdeclarationandaccraagendaforaction.htm
  82. Pauli, G. (2010). The Blue Economy: Report to the Club of Rome. Paradigm Publications.Google Scholar
  83. Polanyi, M. (1966). The Tacit dimension. Chicago: Chicago University Press. Foreword by Amartya Sen, 2009.Google Scholar
  84. Polanyi, M. (1968). The Great transformation: The political and economic origins of our time. New York: Renehart and Co.Google Scholar
  85. Rayner. (2017). The tree conference recorded event, 4th November 2017. Dr Alan Rayner – Understanding trees and fungi as flow forms.Google Scholar
  86. Robbins, J. (2017). Indigenous Public Policy Intensive held at Flinders University, personal communicationGoogle Scholar
  87. Romm, N. R. A. (2017). Foregrounding critical systemic and Indigenous ways of collective knowing toward (re)directing the Anthropocene. In J. J. McIntyre-Mills, Y. Corcoran-Nantes, & N. R. A. Romm (Eds.), Balancing individualism and collectivism: Social and environmental justice (pp. 1–17). New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
  88. Romm, N. R. A. (2018). Responsible research practice: Revisiting transformative paradigm for social research. Switzerland: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Saikia, U., Hosgelen, M., 2010. Timor-Leste`s demographic destiny & its implications for the health sector by 2020, Journal of Population Research, Vol. 27, No. 2, 133-146 Springer.Google Scholar
  90. Saikia, U., & Hosgelen, M. (2016). Timor-Leste’s demographic challenges for environment, peace and nation-building. Asia Pacific Viewpoint, 57(2), 244–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Sen, A. (2000). Development as freedom. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
  92. Sen, A. (2003). Development as capability expansion. In S. Fukuda-Parr & S. Kumar (Eds.), Readings in human development (pp. 41–58). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  93. Sen, A. (2005). Human rights and capabilities. Journal of Human Development, 6(2), 151–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Senge, P. (1990). The fifth discipline. In The art and practice of the learning organisation. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  95. Shiva, V. (2002). Water wars: Privatization, pollution and profit. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
  96. Shiva, V. (2012). Monocultures of the mind. Penang: Third World Network.Google Scholar
  97. Simpson, T. (1997). Indigenous heritage and self-determination: The cultural and intellectual property rights of indigenous people. Copenhagen: IUCN.Google Scholar
  98. Stern, N. (2007). The economics of climate change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. The online version came out in 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Stiglitz, J., Sen, A., & Fitoussi, J. P. (2010). Mis-measuring our lives: Why the GDP doesn’t add up. New York: The New Press.Google Scholar
  100. Szenasy, S. (2017). “William McDonough on Sustainability: ‘Carbon is not the Enemy’.” Interview. Arch Daily, posted January 25, 2017. Retrieved August 26, 2018, from http://www.archdaily.com/804110/william-mcdonough-on-sustainability-carbon-is-not-the-enemy?utm_medium=email&utm_source=ArchDaily%20List
  101. Taylor, S. (2017). Defiance: The life and choices of Lady-Anne Barnard. London: Faber and Faber.Google Scholar
  102. Tenenberg, J. (2012). Technology and the commons. In D. Bollier & S. Helfrich (Eds.), The commons strategies group. Amherst: Levellers Press.Google Scholar
  103. Tlale, L.D.N., & Romm, N.R.A. (2018). Systemic practice and action research.Google Scholar
  104. Ulrich, W., & Reynolds, M. (2010). Critical systems heuristics. In M. Reynolds & S. Holwell (Eds.), Systems approaches to managing change: A practical guide (pp. 242–292). London: Springer.Google Scholar
  105. United Nations. (2014). World Urbanisation Prospects: The 2014 revision. Retrieved from https://esa.un.org/unpd/wup/publications/files/wup2014-highlights.Pdf
  106. United Nations Declaration of the rights of Indigenous peoples. (2007). Retrieved from https://www.humanrights.gov.au/publications/un-declaration-rights-indigenous-peoples-1
  107. United Nations Human Development Index. (2003). A compact among nations to end poverty. New York: UNDP/Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  108. United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction. (2015-2030). Sendai framework. Retrieved from http://www.preventionweb.net/drr-framework/sendai-framework/
  109. United Nations Sustainable Development Goals. (2017). https://www.un.org/development/desa/publications/sdg-report-2017.html.
  110. Usamah, M. (2014). Can the vulnerable be resilient? Co-existence of vulnerability and disaster resilience: Informal settlements in the Philippines. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2014.08.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Wadsworth, Y. (2010). Building in Research and Evaluation. Human inquiry for living systems. Sydney: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
  112. Wahlquist, C. (2017). Yarra council stripped of citizenship ceremony powers after Australia Day changes. https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2017/aug/16/yarra-council-stripped-of-citizenship-ceremony-powers-after-australia-day-changes
  113. Waters, T. (2014). Agriculture and ethical change. In Springer encyclopedia of food and agricultural ethics (pp. 76–85). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  114. Weir, J. (2015). Lives in connection. In K. Gibson, D. Bird Rose, & R. Fincher (Eds.), Manifesto for living in the anthropocene. Brooklyn: Punctum BooksGoogle Scholar
  115. Wilkinson, R., & Pickett, K. (2009). The Spirit Level. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
  116. Yalata and Oak Valley Communities with Mattingley, C. (2009). Maralinga: The Anangu story. Crows Nest: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
  117. Yap, M., & Yu, E. (2016). Operationalising the capability approach: Developing culturally relevant indicators of indigenous wellbeing’—An Australian example. Oxford Development Studies, 44(3), 315–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. Zavestoski, S. (2002). Psychological bases of anticonsumption. Attitudes Psychology and Marketing, 19(2), 149–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Flinders UniversityAdelaideAustralia

Personalised recommendations