Advertisement

“Scum of the Earth”: Animus and Violence Against Sex Offenders in Canadian Penitentiaries

  • Ryan Scrivens
  • Rosemary Ricciardelli
Chapter
Part of the Sexual Crime book series (SEXCR)

Abstract

Correctional scholars have long explored how those who are imprisoned for sexual offences (SOs) are targeted because of the nature of their crimes. In consequence, SOs report experiencing excessive physical, psychological, and emotional violence in prison. On the surface, their experiences resonate with how some scholars conceptualize the patterns of victimization faced by hate crime victims. This area of inquiry, however, remains underexplored. In response, the authors draw from the voices of 56 former federally incarcerated Canadian men, shedding light on their interpretations of other prisoners, either thought to be or actually convicted of a sex offence as well as any parallels in the positioning of SOs in prison and victims of bias-motivated crimes.

Keywords

Sex offenders Prison Animus Violence Canada Victimization 

References

  1. Åkerström, M. (1986). Outcasts in prison: The cases of informers and sex offenders. Deviant Behavior, 7(1), 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Axford, M. (2011). Homicide, sex, robbery and drug offenders in federal corrections: An end-of-2008 review. Correctional Service of Canada.Google Scholar
  3. Bell, J. (2001). Policing hatred. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Blagden, N., & Pemberton, S. (2010). The challenge in conducting qualitative research with convicted sex offenders. The Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 49(3), 269–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chakraborti, N., & Garland, J. (2012). Reconceptualizing hate crime victimization and through the lens of vulnerability and ‘difference’. Theoretical Criminology, 16(4), 499–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory. London: Sage Publications Ltd.Google Scholar
  7. Clemmer, D. (1958). The prison community. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
  8. Compendium, C. (2008). Sex offenders in the correctional system: Survey summary. Lincoln, NE: CEGA Services Inc.Google Scholar
  9. Correctional Service Canada. (2012). Correctional service Canada 2012. Retrieved October 22, 2012, from http://www.csc-scc.gc.ca/text/index-eng.shtml
  10. Cowburn, M. (1996). The black male sex offenders in prison: Images and issues. The Journal of Sexual Aggression, 2(2), 122–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Craig-Henderson, K. (2009). The psychological harms of hate: Implications and interventions. In B. Perry & P. Iganski (Eds.), Hate crimes: The consequences of hate crime (pp. 15–30). Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers.Google Scholar
  12. Gelber, K. (2000). Hate crimes: Public policy implications of the inclusion of gender. Australian Journal of Political Science, 35(2), 275–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Groth, A. N. (1983). Treatment of sex offenders in a correctional institution. In J. G. Greer & I. R. Stuart (Eds.), The sexual aggressor: Current perspectives on treatment. New York, NY: Van Nostrand Reinhold.Google Scholar
  14. Herek, G. M., & Berrill, K. T. (Eds.). (1992). Hate crimes: Confronting violence against lesbians and gay men. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.Google Scholar
  15. Higgins, C., & Ireland, C. A. (2009). Attitudes towards male and female sex offenders: A comparison of forensic staff, prison officers and the general public in Northern Ireland. British Journal of Forensic Practice, 11(1), 14–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hogue, T. E. (1993). Attitudes towards prisoners and sexual offenders. In N. K. Clark & G. M. Stephenson (Eds.), Sexual offenders: Context, assessment and treatment (pp. 27–32). Leicester: BPS.Google Scholar
  17. Iganski, P. (2001). Hate crimes hurt more. American Behavioral Scientist, 45(4), 626–638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Iganski, P., & Lagou, S. (2009). How hate crimes hurt more: Evidence from the British Crime Survey. In B. Perry & P. Iganski (Eds.), Hate crimes: The consequences of hate crime (pp. 1–14). Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers.Google Scholar
  19. Jenness, V., & Broad, K. (1997). Hate crimes: New social movements and the politics of violence. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  20. Lawrence, F. M. (1999). Punishing hate: Bias crimes under American law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Levin, J. (2002). The violence of hate: Confronting racism, anti-Semitism, and other forms of bigotry. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
  22. Liamputtong, P. (2007). Researching the vulnerable: A guide to sensitive research methods. London: Sage Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lim, H. A. (2009). Beyond the immediate victim: Understanding hate crimes as message crimes. In B. Perry & P. Iganski (Eds.), Hate crimes: The consequences of hate crime (pp. 107–122). Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers.Google Scholar
  24. Mason, G. (2010). Prejudice and paedophilia in hate crime laws: Dunn v R. Retrieved from http://ssrn.com/abstract=1601685
  25. Mason, G. (2014). Victim attributes in hate crime law: Difference and the politics of justice. British Journal of Criminology, 54(2), 161–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. McPhail, B. (2003). Gender-bias hate crimes: A review. In B. Perry (Ed.), Hate and bias crime: A reader (pp. 261–280). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  27. Office of the Information and Privacy Commissioner for British Columbia. (2017). Surrey creep catcher. Retrieved from https://www.oipc.bc.ca/orders/2060
  28. Perry, B. (2001). In the name of hate: Understanding hate crimes. London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
  29. Perry, B. (2008). Silent victims: Hate crime against native Americans. Tucson, AZ: University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar
  30. Petersilia, J. (2003). When prisoners come home. Oxford: Oxford University.Google Scholar
  31. Petrunik, M. G. (2002). Managing unacceptable risk: Sex offenders, community response, and social policy in the United States and Canada. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 46(4), 483–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ricciardelli, R. (2014). The inmate code: Looking at men in Canadian penitentiaries. Journal of Crime and Justice, 37(2), 234–255. Retrieved December 3, 2012, from  https://doi.org/10.1080/0735648X.2012.746012
  33. Ricciardelli, R., & Moir, M. (2013). Stigmatized among the stigmatized: Sex offenders in Canadian penitentiaries. Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice, 55(3), 353–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Ricciardelli, R., & Spencer, D. (2014). Exposing ‘sex’ offenders: Precarity, abjection and violence in the Canadian federal prison system. British Journal of Criminology, 54(3), 428–448.  https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azu012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Ricciardelli, R., & Spencer, D. (2017). Violence, sex offenders, and corrections. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Robbers, M. L. P. (2009). Lifers on the outside. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 53(1), 5–28.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X07312953CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Schwaebe, C. (2005). Learning to pass: Sex offenders’ strategies for establishing a viable identity in the prison general population. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 49(6), 614–625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Spencer, D., & Ricciardelli, R. (2016). They’re a very sick group of individuals’: Correctional officers, emotions, and sex offenders. Theoretical Criminology, 21(3), 380–394.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1362480616647590CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Sykes, G. M. (1958). The society of captives. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Vaughn, M. S., & Sapp, A. D. (1989). Less than utopian: Sex offender treatment in a milieu of power struggles, status positioning, and inmate manipulation in state correctional institutions. The Prison Journal, 69(2), 73–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Waldram, J. B. (2007). Everybody has a story: Listening to imprisoned sexual offenders. Qualitative Health Research, 17(7), 963–970.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732307306014CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Wang, L. (1997, November). The transforming power of hate: Social cognition theory and the harms of hate-related crime. Southern California Law Review, 71, 47–135.Google Scholar
  43. Weinstein, J. (1992). First amendment challenges to hate crime legislation: Where’s the speech? Criminal Justice Ethics, 11(2), 6–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. West, D. J. (1983). Sex offenders and offending. In M. Tonry & N. Morris (Eds.), Crime and justice: An annual review of research (pp. 182–233). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  45. Winnick, T. A., & Bodkin, M. (2008). Anticipated stigma and stigma management among those to be labeled ‘ex-con’. Deviant Behavior, 29(4), 295–333.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01639620701588081CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Wolff, N., Blitz, C. L., Shi, J., Siegel, J. A., & Bachman, R. (2007). Physical violence inside prisons: Rates of victimization. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 34(5), 588–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ryan Scrivens
    • 1
  • Rosemary Ricciardelli
    • 2
  1. 1.School of Criminal JusticeMichigan State UniversityEast LansingUSA
  2. 2.Department of SociologyMemorial University of NewfoundlandSt. John’sCanada

Personalised recommendations