Advertisement

Neoliberal Enticements, Neoliberal Dangers: An Ethnographic Content Analysis of Everyday Sexuality in Fresh Meat, Greek, and Sweet Vicious

  • Demetris HadjigeorgiouEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Crime, Media and Culture book series (PSCMC)

Abstract

This chapter uses ethnographic content analysis to examine how universities are constructed as sites of neoliberal, everyday sexuality in three comedy dramas all set in universities: Fresh Meat in the UK, and Greek and Sweet/Vicious in the USA. It argues that they largely though not entirely portray controversial and dangerous aspects of everyday sexuality in universities, for example a sexualised audit culture, as existing on a continuum with its enticing aspects, and not as deviant or criminal outliers. Foucauldian neoliberalism provides a conceptual framework to explore this continuum, and two dimensions of it are examined: universities as sexual markets and sexual agency. The mediated nature of contemporary sexuality makes such an analysis important. Ideas are also offered on how to incorporate pop cultural analysis into efforts which combat everyday sexuality’s problematic elements in universities.

Keywords

Neoliberalism University Sexuality Sexual Agency Sexual Violence 

References

  1. Ahmed, S. (2010). The Promise of Happiness. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Altheide, D. L. (1987). Ethnographic Content Analysis. Qualitative Sociology, 10(1), 65–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Altheide, D. L., & Schneider, C. J. (2013). Qualitative Media Analysis (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Back, L. (2016). Academic Diary: Or Why Higher Education Still Matters. London: Goldsmiths Press.Google Scholar
  5. Bates, L. (2014). Everyday Sexism. London: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  6. Bourdieu, P. (1989). Social Space and Symbolic Power. Sociological Theory, 7(1), 14–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bourdieu, P., & Wacquant, L. J. D. (1992). An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  8. Bröckling, U. (2000). Totale Mobilmachung. Menschenführung im Qualitäts—und Selbstmanagement. In U. Bröckling, S. Krasmann, & T. Lemke (Eds.), Gouvernementalität der Gegenwart. Studien zur Ökonomisierung des Sozialen (pp. 131–167). Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  9. Burchell, G. (1993). Liberal Government and Techniques of the Self. Economy and Society, 22(3), 267–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cannella, G. S., & Perez, M. S. (2012). Emboldened Patriarchy in Higher Education: Feminist Readings of Capitalism, Violence, and Power. Cultural Studies—Critical Methodologies, 12(4), 279–286.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1532708612446421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Crawford, R. (1980). Healthism and the Medicalization of Everyday Life. International Journal of Health Services, 10(3), 365–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. DeGue, S., Valle, L. A., Holt, M. K., Massetti, G. M., Matjasko, J. L., & Tharp, A. T. (2014). A Systematic Review of Primary Prevention Strategies for Sexual Violence Perpetration. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 19(4), 346–362.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2014.05.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dempster, S. (2009). Having the Balls, Having It All? Sport and Constructions of Undergraduate Laddishness. Gender and Education, 21(5), 481–500.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09540250802392299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. DeSantis, A. D. (2007). Inside Greek U: Fraternities, Sororities, and the Pursuit of Pleasure, Power and Prestige. Lexington, KY: University Press of Kentucky.Google Scholar
  15. Edgerton, S., Holm, G., Daspit, T., & Farber, P. (Eds.). (2005). Imagining the Academy: Higher Education and Popular Culture. New York: RoutledgeFalmer.Google Scholar
  16. Ellsworth, E. (1989). Why Doesn’t This Feel Empowering? Working Through the Repressive Myths of Critical Pedagogy. Harvard Educational Review, 59(3), 297–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fenton, R. A., & Jones, C. (2017). An Exploratory Study on the Beliefs about Gender-based Violence Held by Incoming Undergraduates in England. Journal of Gender-Based Violence, 1(2), 147–167.  https://doi.org/10.1332/239868017X15090095609822CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fishwick, E., & Mak, H. (2015). Fighting Crime, Battling Injustice: The World of Real-Life Superheroes. Crime Media Culture, 11(3), 335–356.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1741659015596110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Foubert, J., Newberry, J. T., & Tatum, J. L. (2007). Behavior Differences Seven Months Later: Effects of a Rape Prevention Program. Journal of Student Affairs Research and Practice, 44(4), 728–749.  https://doi.org/10.2202/1949-6605.1866CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Foucault, M. (1990). The History of Sexuality: An Introduction. New York: Vintage House.Google Scholar
  21. Foucault, M. (2008). The Birth of Biopolitics. Lectures at the Collège de France 1978–1979. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  22. Garland, D. (2001). The Culture of Control: Crime and Social Order in Contemporary Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Gershon, I. (2011). Neoliberal Agency. Current Anthropology, 52(4), 537–555.  https://doi.org/10.1086/660866CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gill, R. (2008). Culture and Subjectivity in Neoliberal and Postfeminist Times. Subjectivity, 25, 432–445.  https://doi.org/10.1057/sub.2008.28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gill, R., & Donaghue, N. (2013). As If Postfeminism had Come True: The Turn to Agency in Cultural Studies of ‘Sexualisation’. In S. Madhok, A. Phillips, & K. Wilson (Eds.), Gender, Agency, and Coercion. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  26. Giroux, H., & McLaren, P. (1989). Critical Pedagogy, the State, and the Struggle for Culture. Albany: SUNY.Google Scholar
  27. Green, A. I. (Ed.). (2014). Sexual Fields: Toward a Sociology of Collective Sexual Life. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  28. Horvath, M. A. H., Hegarty, P., Tyler, S., & Mansfield, S. (2012). “Lights on at the End of the Party”. Are Lads’ Mags Mainstreaming Dangerous Sexism? British Journal of Psychology, 103(4), 454–471.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.2011.02086.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Houellebecq, M. (2000). Atomised. Translated from French by F. Wynne. London: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  30. Iedema, R. (2001). Resemiotization. Semiotica, 37(1/4), 23–40.Google Scholar
  31. Iedema, R. (2003). Multimodality, Resemiotization: Extending the Analysis of Discourse as Multi-semiotic Practice. Visual Communication, 2(1), 29–57.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1470357203002001751CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. IMDb. (2017). The Best TV Shows about College [Online]. Retrieved May 18, 2018, from https://www.imdb.com/list/ls033093453
  33. Johnson, M. A., & Turner, K. M. (2018). Models and Misbehavior: ABC Family’s Portrayals of Sexual Health Topics. In E. L. Newman & E. Witsell (Eds.), ABC Family to Freedom TV: Essays on the Millennial-Focused Network and Its Programs. Jefferson, NC: McFarland and Company, Inc.Google Scholar
  34. Lather, P. (1995). Post-critical Pedagogies: A Feminist Reading. In P. McLaren (Ed.), Postmodernism, Post-colonialism and Pedagogy. Albert Park, VIC: James Nicholas Publishers.Google Scholar
  35. Lemke, T. (2001). ‘The Birth of Bio-politics’: Michel Foucault’s Lecture at the Collège de France on Neo-liberal Governmentality. Economy and Society, 30(2), 190–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Levy, A. (2005). Female Chauvinist Pigs: Women and the Rise of Raunch Culture. London: Pocket Books.Google Scholar
  37. Ludwig, G. (2016). Desiring Neoliberalism. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 13(4), 417–427.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-016-0257-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. McRobbie, A. (1994). Postmodernism and Popular Culture. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Napolitano, J. (2015). Only Yes Means Yes: An Essay on University Policies Regarding Sexual Violence and Sexual Assault. Yale Law & Policy Review, 33(2), Article 4, 387–402. Retrieved April 1, 2018, from https://ylpr.yale.edu/sites/default/files/YLPR/33.2_policy_essay_-_napolitano_final.pdf
  40. National Union of Students. (n.d.). Overcoming Barriers. London: NUS. Retrieved May 18, 2018, from https://www.nusconnect.org.uk/liberation/women-students/tackling-lad-culture
  41. National Union of Students. (2010). Hidden Marks: A Study of Women Students’ Experiences of Harassment, Stalking, Violence and Sexual Assault. London: NUS.Google Scholar
  42. National Union of Students. (2013). That’s What She Said: Women Students’ Experiences of ‘Lad Culture’ at Universities. London: NUS.Google Scholar
  43. notsam. (2016). Milo Yiannopoulos—Amber Rose, Rape Culture is Fake, Slut Walk, etc—#SRShow [Video Online]. Retrieved May 18, 2018, from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jWhx3QamB04&t=146s
  44. Phipps, A. (2016). (Re)theorising Laddish Masculinities in Higher Education. Gender and Education, 29(7), 815–830.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2016.1171298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Phipps, A. (2017). Speaking Up for What’s Right: Politics, Markets and Violence in Higher Education. Feminist Theory, 18(3), 357–361.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1464700117722001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Phipps, A., & Young, I. (2015). Neoliberalisation and ‘Lad Cultures’ in Higher Education. Sociology, 49(2), 305–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Rebel Media. (2016). “Rape Culture” is REAL—In Prisons, Muslim Countries (and THESE Places, Too) [Video Online]. Retrieved May 18, 2018, from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZtO2A5aLnrs&t=166s
  48. Revesz, R. (2016, June 14). Joe Biden: We Need to Stop This Culture of Rape Jokes and ‘Locker Room Banter’. Independent [Online]. Retrieved May 18, 2018, from https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/joe-biden-we-need-to-stop-this-culture-of-rape-jokes-and-x2018locker-room-banter-a7081956.html
  49. Rose, N. (1999). Governing the Soul: The Shaping of the Private Self (2nd ed.). London: Free Association Books.Google Scholar
  50. Saunders, B., Sim, J., Kingstone, T., Baker, S., Waterfield, J., Bartlam, B., et al. (2017). Saturation in Qualitative Research: Exploring Its Conceptualization and Operationalization. Quality and Quantity, 1–15.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135=017-0574-8
  51. Starks, H., & Trinidad, S. B. (2007). Choose Your Method: A Comparison of Phenomenology, Discourse Analysis, and Grounded Theory. Qualitative Health Research, 17(10), 1372–1380.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732307307031CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Steinmetz, K. F. (2017). Carceral Horror: Punishment and Control in Silent Hill. Crime, Media, Culture, 1–23.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1741659017699045CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Sweeney, B. (2014). To Sexually Perform or Protect: Masculine Identity Construction and Perceptions of Women’s Sexuality on a University Campus in the Midwestern USA. Gender, Place & Culture, 21(9), 1108–1124.  https://doi.org/10.1080/0966369X.2013.817968CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Tobolowsky, B. F. (2017). Cultivating Anti-Intellectualism in the Fictional University. In B. F. Tobolowsky & P. J. Reynolds (Eds.), Anti-Intellectual Representations of American Colleges and Universities. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Young, J. (2007). The Vertigo of Late Modernity. London: SAGE.Google Scholar

Episodes

  1. Fresh Meat, 2011, Series 1 episode 1. Channel 4, 21 September 2011, 22.00.Google Scholar
  2. Fresh Meat, 2011, Series 1 episode 3. Channel 4, 5 October 2011, 22.00.Google Scholar
  3. Fresh Meat, 2011, Series 1 episode 6. Channel 4, 26 October 2011, 22.00.Google Scholar
  4. Fresh Meat, 2012, Series 2 episode 4, Channel 4, 30 October 2012, 22.00.Google Scholar
  5. Fresh Meat, 2012, Series 2 episode 8, Channel 4, 27 November 2012, 22.00.Google Scholar
  6. Fresh Meat, 2013, Series 3 episode 1. Channel 4, 4 November 2013, 22.00.Google Scholar
  7. Fresh Meat, 2013, Series 3 episode 2. Channel 4, 11 November 2013, 22.00.Google Scholar
  8. Fresh Meat, 2013, Series 3 episode 8. Channel 4, 23 November 2013, 22.00.Google Scholar
  9. Greek, 2007, Series 1 episode 1., Disney-ABC Domestic Television, ABC Family, 9 July 2007, 21.00.Google Scholar
  10. Greek, 2007, Series 1 episode 3. Disney-ABC Domestic Television, ABC Family, 23 July 2007, 21.00.Google Scholar
  11. Greek, 2007, Series 1 episode 10. Disney-ABC Domestic Television, ABC Family, 10 September 2007, 21.00.Google Scholar
  12. Greek, 2008, Series 1 episode 20. Disney-ABC Domestic Television, ABC Family, 26 May 2008, 21.00.Google Scholar
  13. Greek, 2009, Series 2 episode 13. Disney-ABC Domestic Television, ABC Family, 13 April, 21.00.Google Scholar
  14. Greek, 2009, Series 3 episode 1. Disney-ABC Domestic Television, ABC Family, 31 August 2009, 21.00.Google Scholar
  15. Greek, 2011, Series 4 episode 10. Disney-ABC Domestic Television, ABC Family, 7 March 2011, 21.00.Google Scholar
  16. Sweet/Vicious, 2016. Series 1 episode 1, MTV, 15 November 2016, 22.00.Google Scholar
  17. Sweet/Vicious, 2016. Series 1 episode 3, MTV, 29 November 2016, 22.00.Google Scholar
  18. Sweet/Vicious, 2016. Series 1 episode 4, MTV, 6 December 2016, 22.00.Google Scholar
  19. Sweet/Vicious, 2016. Series 1 episode 5, MTV, 13 December 2016, 22.00.Google Scholar
  20. Sweet/Vicious, 2016. Series 1 episode 6, MTV, 3 January 2017, 22.00.Google Scholar
  21. Sweet/Vicious, 2016. Series 1 episode 7, MTV, 10 January 2017, 22.00.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of RoehamptonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations