Advertisement

What Is Problem Represented to Be: Water Scarcity, Water Mismanagement or Misdirecting the Systems?

  • Jackwin SimbolonEmail author
  • Janet McIntyre-Mills
Chapter
Part of the Contemporary Systems Thinking book series (CST)

Abstract

The chapter delves into the area of concern of water scarcity in an area in Indonesia that we will call Nauli. The central and regional governments have misused the water provision function to commodify drinking water, and the government regards water as a commercial good and prefers to sell it to the people rather than provide it as a common good. The chapter applies a critical analysis to address the social, cultural, political, economic and environmental context of the problem which reveals that the root of the problem is a misdirected system of managing water in the interests of profit for some at the expense of the majority and the environment. Data collected from fieldwork undertaken by Simbolon (December 2015) shows that conflicts between governments occurred and water companies commodified water while neglecting to maintain water quality and to provide services that also support and preserve the environment. The chapter proceeds to examine the wicked problem of how to address the challenges of decentralisation by ensuring that the needs of people are met by those who are elected and that the constitutional requirements of providing water are indeed addressed. The WPRB approach is used to produce a map of the different ways in which the problem is represented and propose a shift in the paradigm to address the water management problem through Ulrich’s critical systems heuristics (CSH).

Keywords

Wicked problem Water management Critical systems heuristics Sustainability 

References

  1. Ackoff, R. L. (1974). Redesigning the future: A systems approach to societal problems. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  2. Atkinson, A. B., & Stiglitz, J. E. (2015). Lectures on public economics. Princeton University Press: Princeton.Google Scholar
  3. Australian Public Service Commission. (2007). Tackling wicked problems: A public policy perspective. Parkes: Australian Public Service Commission.Google Scholar
  4. Bacchi, C. L. (2009). Analysing policy: What’s the problem represented to be? Frenchs Forest: Pearson Australia.Google Scholar
  5. Bakker, K. (2003). Liquid assets: How we provide water depends on whether we view water as a commodity or as a public good. Alternatives Journal, 29(2), 17.Google Scholar
  6. Berg, B. (2001). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences. California State University: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
  7. Bernanke, B. (2014). Principles of macroeconomics (4th ed.). North Ryde: McGraw-Hill Education.Google Scholar
  8. Bosnich, D. A. (1996). The principle of subsidiarity. Religion and Liberty, 6(4), 9–10.Google Scholar
  9. Boulding, K. E. (1966). The economics of the coming spaceship earth. In H. Jarrett (Ed.), Environmental quality issues in a growing economy (pp. 3–14). Baltimore: Resources for the Future/Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  10. BPS Nauli City. (2016). Nauli City in figures 2015. Nauli: BPS of Nauli City.Google Scholar
  11. Bricki, N., & Green, J. (2007). A guide to using qualitative research methodology. New York: Medicins Sans Frontieres.Google Scholar
  12. Bryman, A. (2012). Social research methods. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Cabrera, D. (2006). Boundary critique: A minimal concept theory of systems thinking. In Proceedings of the 50th Annual Meeting of the International Society for the Systems Sciences, North America. Retrieved from http://journals.isss.org/index.php/proceedings50th/article/view/403/161
  14. Castle, J. E. (2003). Maximizing research opportunities: Secondary data analysis. Journal of Neuroscience Nursing, 35(5), 287–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Chambers, R. (1997). Whose reality counts?: Putting the first last. London: Intermediate Technology Publications Ltd (ITP).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Checkland, P., & Poulter, J. (2010). Soft systems methodology. In Systems approaches to managing change: A practical guide (pp. 191–242). Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Churchman, C. W. (1967). Guest editorial: Wicked problems. Management Science, 14(4), 141–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Churchman, C. W. (1970). Operations research as a profession. Management Science, 17(2), B-37–B-53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Churchman, C. W. (1979). The systems approach (Rev. and updated ed.). New York: Dell.Google Scholar
  20. Cleary, M., Horsfall, J., & Hayter, M. (2014). Data collection and sampling in qualitative research: Does size matter? Journal of Advanced Nursing, 70(3), 473–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Elkington, J. (1999). Cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st Century business (Pbk ed.). Oxford: Capstone.Google Scholar
  22. Evans, M. (2013). The principle of subsidiarity as a social and political principle in Catholic social teaching. Solidarity: The Journal of Catholic Social Thought and Secular Ethics, 3(1), 4.Google Scholar
  23. Gleick, P. H. (2013). A drop in the bucket: Successful management of water must balance development needs and economic considerations. Finance & Development, 50(3), 12.Google Scholar
  24. Gormley, W. T., Jr. (1983). Policy, politics, and public utility regulation. American Journal of Political Science, 27, 86–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gorre-Dale, E. (1992). The Dublin statement on water and sustainable development. Environmental Conservation, 19(2), 181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gray, N. F. (2008). Drinking water quality: Problems and solutions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Head, B. (2010). Wicked problems in water governance: Paradigm changes to promote water sustainability and address planning uncertainty. City East: Urban Water Security Research Alliance.Google Scholar
  28. Heaton, J. (2003). Secondary data analysis. In The AZ of social research (pp. 285–288). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  29. Horn, R. E. (2001). Knowledge mapping for complex social messes. Presentation to the “Foundations in the Knowledge Economy” at the David and Lucile Packard Foundation.Google Scholar
  30. Horn, R. E., & Weber, P. (2007). New tools for resolving wicked problems. MacroVu Inc and Strategy Kinetics. Retrieved from http://www.strategykinetics.com/files/New_Tools_For_Resolving_Wicked_Problems.pdf
  31. Hyman, H. H. (1972). Secondary analysis of sample surveys: Principles, procedures, and potentialities. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  32. Jackson, M. C. (2000). Systems approaches to management. Berlin: Springer Science & Business Media.Google Scholar
  33. Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A., & Mastruzzi, M. (2009). Governance matters VIII: Aggregate and individual governance indicators 1996–2008. Washington, DC: The World Bank.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Marshall, A. (2009). Principles of economics: Unabridged eighth edition. New York: Cosimo.Google Scholar
  35. McIntyre-Mills, J. (2002). Critical systemic praxis for social and environmental justice: A case study of management, governance, and policy. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 15(1), 3–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. McIntyre-Mills, J. (2006). Systemic governance and accountability working and re-working the conceptual and spatial boundaries. New York: Springer Science + Business Media.Google Scholar
  37. McIntyre-Mills, J. (2014). Systemic ethics and non-anthropocentric stewardship (270 pp). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. McIntyre-Mills, J. (2017). Planetary passport for representation, accountability and re-generation. In Contemporary systems series. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  39. McIntyre-Mills, J., De Vries, D., & Binchai, N. (2014). From Wall Street to Wellbeing. New York: Springer. 253 pp. ISBN 978-1-4899-7465-5.Google Scholar
  40. Midgley, G. (2000). Systemic intervention philosophy, methodology, and practice. Boston: Springer US: Imprint: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Nussbaum, M. (2003). Capabilities as fundamental entitlements: Sen and social justice. Feminist Economics, 9(2–3), 33–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Nussbaum, M., & Sen, A. (1993). The quality of life. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. OECD. (2003). Sustainable development (Vol. 2010). Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  44. Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  45. Paul, E. (2002). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, 460.Google Scholar
  46. Pauli, G. A. (2010). The blue economy: 10 years, 100 innovations, 100 million jobs. Taos: Paradigm.Google Scholar
  47. Public Citizen. (2003). Water Privatization Fiascos. Web site cases on Buenos Aires, Manila, Cochabamba, Atlanta, Jakarta, Nelspruit, and the United Kingdom. Retrieved from http://www.citizen.org/cmep/Water/cmep_Water/fiascos
  48. Purwanto, S. A. (2005). Forest resource management and self-governance in regional autonomy Indonesia. In Regionalism in Post-Suharto Indonesia (Vol. 4, p. 211).Google Scholar
  49. Quilligan, J. B. (2012). ‘Why distinguish common goods from public goods’, 2012. In The wealth of the commons. A world beyond market & state. Amherst: Levellers Press. Retrieved from http://p2pfoundation.net/Public_Goods_vs_Common_Goods
  50. Reynolds, M., & Holwell, S. (2010). Systems approaches to managing change: A practical guide. Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Rittel, H. W., & Webber, M. M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4(2), 155–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Rittenberg, L. (2009). Principles of microeconomics. Boston: Flat World Knowledge.Google Scholar
  53. Roberts, J. (2006). Limits to communities of practice (management practice approach). Journal of Management Studies, 43(3), 623–640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Robeyns, I. (2003). The capability approach: An interdisciplinary introduction. In Training course preceding the Third International Conference on the Capability Approach, Pavia, Italy.Google Scholar
  55. Rogers, P., De Silva, R., & Bhatia, R. (2002). Water is an economic good: How to use prices to promote equity, efficiency, and sustainability. Water Policy, 4(1), 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Rozelle, L. T., & Wathen, R. L. (1993). Consumption of low TDS water, a committee report by water quality association science advisory committee 1992–1993.Google Scholar
  57. Schelwald-van der Kley, L. (2009). Water, a way of life: Sustainable water management in a cultural context. Boca Raton: CRC.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Schmidt, F. H., & Ferguson, J. H. A. (1951). Rainfall types based on wet and dry period ratios for Indonesia with Western New Guinea, Kementerian perhubungan; no. 42, [s.n.], Djakarta [etc.].Google Scholar
  59. Sekretariat Negara Indonesia. (1986). Tiga puluh tahun Indonesia merdeka. Indonesia: Sekretariat Negara Republik.Google Scholar
  60. Shiva, V. (2002). Water wars: Privatization, pollution and profit. New Delhi: India Research Press.Google Scholar
  61. Simbolon (2018), Nauli City Health Profile (2014)” are cited in the text but not provided in the reference list. Kindly provide them in the reference list or delete these citations from the text.Google Scholar
  62. Stiglitz et al. (2011), should be Stiglitz, J., A. Sen, and J.P. Fitoussi. 2010. Mis-Measuring Our Lives: Why the GDP Doesn’t Add Up. New York: The New Press.Google Scholar
  63. Stiglitz, J., Sen, A., & Fitoussi, J. P. (2010). Mis-measuring our lives: Why the GDP Doesn’t add up. New York: The New Press.Google Scholar
  64. Sulistiyanto, P., & Erb, M. (2005). Introduction: Entangled politics in post-Suharto Indonesia. In M. Erb, P. Sulistiyanto, & C. Faucher (Eds.), Regionalism in post-Suharto Indonesia (pp. 1–17). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  65. Ulrich, W. (1983). Critical heuristics of social planning: A new approach to practical philosophy. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  66. Ulrich, W. (1996). A primer to critical systems heuristics for action researchers. Hull: University of Hull, Centre for Systems Studies.Google Scholar
  67. Ulrich, W. (2005). A brief introduction to critical systems heuristics (CSH), ECOSENSUS project site. Milton Keynes: The Open University.Google Scholar
  68. UNDP. (2010). Human development report 2010. New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
  69. Vartanian, T. P. (2010). Secondary data analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Vischer, R. K. (2001). Subsidiarity as a principle of governance: Beyond devolution. Indiana Law Review, 35, 103.Google Scholar
  71. Washington State Department of Health. (2016). Coliform bacteria and drinking water. Seattle: Washington State Department of Health.Google Scholar
  72. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Wenger, E. (2009). Communities of practice. Communities, 22, 57.Google Scholar
  74. WHO/UNICEF. (2012). Millennium Development Goal drinking water target met. Retrieved February 11, 2015, from http://www.who.int/mediacentre/news/releases/2012/drinking_water_20120306/en/
  75. Wilson, J. Q. (1980). The politics of regulation. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  76. Yin, R. K. (2013). Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Flinders UniversityAdelaideAustralia

Personalised recommendations