Advertisement

Representations for Compliant Manipulation

  • Daniel Sebastian Leidner
Chapter
Part of the Springer Tracts in Advanced Robotics book series (STAR, volume 127)

Abstract

Mental representations of objects, actions, motions and effects are fundamental to many cognitive capabilities of humans. These four types of representations influence each other significantly. In fact, there is evidence that humans maintain the knowledge about actions w. r. t. particular objects and that actions are represented in the human mind by their outcome. This chapter describes similar representations for robotic manipulation that incorporate this reasoning.

References

  1. Bartels, Georg, Kresse, Ingo, and Beetz, Michael. 2013. Constraint-Based Movement Representation Grounded in Geometric Features. In Proceedings of the IEEE/RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots (ICHR), 547–554.Google Scholar
  2. Beetz, Michael, Klank, Ulrich, Kresse, Ingo, Maldonado, Alexis, Mösenlechner, Lorenz, Pangercic, Dejan, Rühr, Thomas, and Tenorth, Moritz. 2011. Robotic Roommates Making Pancakes. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Humanoid Robots (ICHR), 529–536.Google Scholar
  3. Belkin, Andrey. 2010. Object-Oriented World Modelling for Autonomous Systems. In Proceedings of the Joint Workshop of Fraunhofer IOSB and Institute for Anthropomatics, 231. KIT Scientific Publishing.Google Scholar
  4. Buss, Samuel R. 2004. Introduction to Inverse Kinematics with Jacobian Transpose, Pseudoinverse and Damped Least Squares Methods. IEEE Journal of Robotics and Automation 17 (1–19): 16.Google Scholar
  5. Craig, John J. 2005. Introduction to Robotics: Mechanics and Control, vol. 3. Pearson Prentice Hall Upper Saddle River.Google Scholar
  6. Dalibard, Sébastien, Nakhaei, Alireza, Lamiraux, Florent, and Laumond, Jean-Paul. 2010. Manipulation of Documented Objects by a Walking Humanoid Robot. In 2010 10th IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots (Humanoids), 518–523, IEEE.Google Scholar
  7. Gabriely, Yoav, and Elon Rimon. 2001. Spanning-Tree based Coverage of Continuous Areas by a Mobile Robot. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence 31 (1–4): 77–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ghallab, Malik, Howe, Adele, Christianson, Dave, McDermott, Drew, Ram, Ashwin, Veloso, Manuela, Weld, Daniel, and Wilkins, David. 1998. PDDL-The Planning Domain Definition Language. AIPS98 Planning Committee, 78(4): 1–27.Google Scholar
  9. Ghallab, Malik, Dana, Nau, and Paolo, Traverso. 2004. Automated Planning: Theory and Practice. Morgan Kaufmann.Google Scholar
  10. Gheta, Ioana, Heizmann, Michael, Belkin, Andrey, and Beyerer, Jürgen. 2010. World Modeling for Autonomous Systems. In Proceedings of the Advances in Artificial Intelligence (KI), 176.Google Scholar
  11. Gibson, James J. 1986. The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception, Routledge.Google Scholar
  12. Hart, Stephen, Dinh, Paul, and Hambuchen, Kimberly. 2015. The Affordance Template ROS Package for Robot Task Programming. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 6227–6234.Google Scholar
  13. Hebb, Donald Olding. 2005. The Organization of Behavior: A Neuropsychological Theory, Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  14. Hommel, Bernhard. 2009. Action Control According to TEC (Theory of Event Coding). Psychological Research PRPF 73 (4): 512–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kallmann, Marcelo, and Daniel Thalmann. 1998. Modeling Objects for Interaction Tasks. In Proceedings of the Eurographics Workshop on Computer Animation and Simulation, vol. 98, 73–86.Google Scholar
  16. Kowalski, Robert and Sergot, Marek. 1989. A Logic-based Calculus of Events. In Foundations of Knowledge Base Management, 23–55. Springer.Google Scholar
  17. Krüger, Norbert, Christopher Geib, Justus Piater, Ronald Petrick, Mark Steedman, Florentin Wörgötter, Aleš Ude, Tamim Asfour, Dirk Kraft, Damir Omrčen, et al. 2011. Object-Action Complexes: Grounded Abstractions of Sensory-Motor Processes. Robotics and Autonomous Systems 59 (10): 740–757.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kunze, Lars, Dolha, Mihai Emanuel, Guzman, Emitza, and Beetz, Michael. 2011. Simulation-based Temporal Projection of Everyday Robot Object Manipulation. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS), 107–114.Google Scholar
  19. Leidner, Daniel, Borst, Christoph, and Hirzinger, Gerd. 2012. Things Are Made for What they are: Solving Manipulation Tasks by Using Functional Object Classes. In Proceedings of the IEEE/RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots (ICHR), 429–435.Google Scholar
  20. Leidner, Daniel, Dietrich, Alexander, Schmidt, Florian, Borst, Christoph, and Albu-Schäffer, Alin. 2014. Object-Centered Hybrid Reasoning for Whole-Body Mobile Manipulation. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 1828–1835.Google Scholar
  21. Leidner, Daniel, and Michael, Beetz. 2016. Inferring the Effects of Wiping Motions based on Haptic Perception. In Proceedings of the IEEE/RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots (ICHR), 461–468.Google Scholar
  22. Leidner, Daniel, Bejjani, Wissam, Albu-Schäffer, Alin, and Beetz, Michael. 2016a. Robotic Agents Representing, Reasoning, and Executing Wiping Tasks for Daily Household Chores. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS), 1006–1014.Google Scholar
  23. Leidner, Daniel, Dietrich, Alexander, Beetz, Michael, and Albu-Schäffer, Alin. 2016b. Knowledge-enabled Parameterization of Whole-Body Control Strategies for Compliant Service Robots. Autonomous Robots (AURO): Special Issue on Whole-Body Control of Contacts and Dynamics for Humanoid Robots, 40 (3): 519–536.Google Scholar
  24. Levison, Libby. 1996. Connecting Planning and Acting via Object-Specific Reasoning. Ph.D. thesis, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
  25. McGuinness, Deborah L, Van Harmelen, Frank, et al. 2004. OWL Web Ontology Language Overview. W3C Recommendation, 10 (10): 2004.Google Scholar
  26. Pablo Lana, Ernesto, Vilhena Adorno, Bruno, and Andrey Maia, Carlos. 2015. A New Algebraic Approach for the Description of Robotic Manipulation Tasks. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 3083–3088.Google Scholar
  27. Şahin, Erol, Çakmak, Maya, Doğar, Mehmet R, Uğur, Emre, and Üçoluk, Göktürk. 2007. To Afford or not to Afford: A New Formalization of Affordances Toward Affordance-based Robot Control. Adaptive Behavior, 15 (4): 447–472.Google Scholar
  28. Sterling, Leon, and Ehud Y, Shapiro. 1994. The Art of Prolog: Advanced Programming Techniques. MIT press.Google Scholar
  29. Tenorth, Moritz, and Michael, Beetz. 2009. Knowrob-knowledge Processing for Autonomous Personal Robots. In Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), 4261–4266, IEEE.Google Scholar
  30. Tenorth, Moritz, Ulrich Klank, Dejan Pangercic, and Michael Beetz. 2011. Web-enabled Robots. IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine 18 (2): 58–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Tenorth, Moritz, Perzylo, Alexander, Lafrenz, Reinhard, and Beetz, Michael. 2012. The RoboEarth Language: Representing and Exchanging Knowledge about Actions, Objects, and Environments. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 1284–1289.Google Scholar
  32. Vanthienen, Dominick, Robyns, Steven, Aertbeliën, Erwin and De Schutter, Joris. 2013. Force-sensorless Robot Force Control within the Instantaneous Task Specification and Estimation (iTaSC) Framework. In Benelux Meeting on Systems and Control.Google Scholar
  33. Waibel, Markus, Michael Beetz, Javier Civera, RRaffaello D’Andrea, Jos Elfring, Dorian Galvez-Lopez, Kai Häussermann, Rob Janssen, JMM Montiel, Alexander Perzylo, Björn Schießle, Moritz Tenorth, Oliver Zweigle, and MJG van de Molengraft. 2011. RoboEarth. In IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine, 18 (2): 69–82.Google Scholar
  34. Wimböck, Thomas. 2013. Controllers for Compliant Two-Handed Dexterous Manipulation. Ph.D. thesis, Vienna University of Technology.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Robotics and MechatronicsGerman Aerospace Center (DLR)WesslingGermany

Personalised recommendations