Advertisement

TEA - A Technology Evaluation and Adoption Influence Framework for Small and Medium Sized Enterprises

  • Dominic Spalinger
  • Stella Gatziu Grivas
  • Andre de la Harpe
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing book series (LNBIP, volume 339)

Abstract

Emerging technologies compel small and medium sized enterprises (SMEs) to advance their digital transformation. However, a conclusive and applicable overview on influencing factors for the evaluation and adoption of new technologies, on a sensitizing level, is nonexistent. Previous work has focused on adoption frameworks on an implementation level, disregarding the interconnectedness with evaluation and an appropriate application for SMEs. To empower SMEs to develop a transformation strategy considering these influencing factors, the Technology Evaluation and Adoption Influence (TEA) Framework has been designed. It covers nine influence factors operating from the external and internal company environment. To determine the factors, 56 insurance brokers distributed in Switzerland, South Africa and Turkey were interviewed and existing frameworks were analyzed. The design process went through three iterations involving experts for verification and testing. Within a field test with an expert user, the framework proved its conclusiveness, applicability, and significance for SMEs.

Keywords

Technology Evaluation and adoption Transformation Digitalization SME 

References

  1. 1.
    Adomavicius, G., Bockstedt, J.C., Gupta, A., Kauffman, R.J.: Making sense of technology trends in the information technology landscape: a design science approach. MIS Q. 32, 779–809 (2008).  https://doi.org/10.2307/25148872CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Al-Mamary, Y.H., Shamsuddin, A., Aziati, N.: Factors affecting successful adoption of management information systems in organizations towards enhancing organizational performance. Am. J. Syst. Softw. 2, 121–126 (2014).  https://doi.org/10.12691/ajss-2-5-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cappiello, A.: Technology and the Insurance Industry: Re-configuring the Competitive Landscape. Springer, Cham (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74712-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Châlons, C., Dufft, N.: Die Rolle der IT als Enabler für Digitalisierung. In: Abolhassan, F. (ed.) Was treibt die Digitalisierung?, pp. 27–37. Springer, Wiesbaden (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-10640-9_2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cragg, P.B., Zinatelli, N.: The evolution of information systems in small firms. Inf. Manag. 29, 1–8 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dufft, N., von Bassewitz, B.: Digitalisierung in der Versicherungsbranche (2017)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gatziu Grivas, S., Peter, M., Giovanoli, C., Hubli, K.: FHNW maturity models for cloud and enterprise IT. School of Business, University of Applied Sciences and Arts Northwestern Switzerland (2017)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ghobakhloo, M., Hong, T.S., Sabouri, M.S., Zulkifli, N.: Strategies for successful information technology adoption in small and medium-sized enterprises. Information 3, 36–67 (2012).  https://doi.org/10.3390/info3010036CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Grandon, E.E., Pearson, J.M.: Electronic commerce adoption: an empirical study of small and medium US businesses. Inf. Manag. 42, 197–216 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Heeb, D., Lanaia, A., Zimmermann, P., Gatziu Grivas, S., Peter, M.: The panoramic lens model, assessment of economic, industrial, and social factors to support enterprises in realizing the urgency of a digital transformation. University of Applied Science Northwest Switzerland (2018)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Henderson, J.C., Venkatraman, H.: Strategic alignment: leveraging information technology for transforming organizations. IBM Syst. J. 32, 472–484 (1993).  https://doi.org/10.1147/sj.382.0472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hershatter, A., Epstein, M.: Millennials and the world of work: an organization and management perspective. J. Bus. Psychol. 25, 211–223 (2010).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-010-9160-yCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hevner, A.R.: A three cycle view of design science research. Scand. J. Inf. Syst. 19, 4 (2007)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kintsch, A., DePaula, R.: A framework for the adoption of assistive technology. In: SWAAAC 2002 Supporting Learning Assistive Through Technology, pp. 1–10 (2002)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kuechler, W., Vaishnavi, V.: Design Science Research Methods and Patterns: Innovating Information and Communication Technology. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2015)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lin, C., Huang, Y.-A., Burn, J.: Realising B2B e-commerce benefits: the link with IT maturity, evaluation practices, and B2BEC adoption readiness. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 16, 806–819 (2007).  https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000724CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Luftman, J., Lyytinen, K., ben Zvi, T.: Enhancing the measurement of information technology (IT) business alignment and its influence on company performance. J. Inf. Technol. 32, 26–46 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1057/jit.2015.23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Madrid-Guijarro, A., García-Pérez-de-Lema, D., Van Auken, H.: Financing constraints and SME innovation during economic crises. Acad. Rev. Latinoam. Adm. 29, 84–106 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Martinez, L.A.M., Hurtado, S.R.F.: Internal communication issues in the firms: does it affect the productivity? Rev. Eur. Stud. 10, 1 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.5539/res.v10n2p1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Martinsons, M., Davison, R., Tse, D.: The balanced scorecard: a foundation for the strategic management of information systems. Decis. Support Syst. 25, 71–88 (1999).  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-9236(98)00086-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Oliveira, T., Martins, M.F.: Literature review of information technology adoption models at firm level. Electron. J. Inf. Syst. Eval. 14, 110–121 (2011)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Padilla-Vega, R., Sénquiz-Díaz, C., Ojeda, A.: Toward a conceptual framework of technology adoption: factors impacting the acceptance of the mobile technology in the international business growth. Int. J. Sci. Technol. Res. 4, 81–86 (2015)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Peter, M., Graf, M., Gatziu Grivas, S., Giovanoli, C.: Die ABILI-Methodik: inspiration und Navigation bei der Digitalen transformation mit Fokus auf KMU. Institut für Wirtschaftsinformatik IW (2018)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Peter, M.K.: KMU-transformation: Als KMU die Digitale transformation erfolgreich umsetzen: Forschungsresultate und Praxisleitfaden. BoD–Books on Demand (2017)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Rangone, A.: A resource-based approach to strategy analysis in small-medium sized enterprises. Small Bus. Econ. 12, 233–248 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Rogers, E.M.: Diffusion of Innovations, p. 12. The Free Press, New York (1995)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Schön, E.-M., Thomaschewski, J., Escalona, M.J.: Agile requirements engineering: a systematic literature review. Comput. Stand. Interfaces 49, 79–91 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csi.2016.08.011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Sin Tan, K., Choy Chong, S., Lin, B., Cyril Eze, U.: Internet-based ICT adoption: evidence from Malaysian SMEs. Ind. Manag. Data Syst. 109, 224–244 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Sosna, M., Trevinyo-Rodríguez, R.N., Velamuri, S.R.: Business model innovation through trial-and-error learning: the Naturhouse case. Long Range Plann. 43, 383–407 (2010).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2010.02.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Soto-Acosta, P., Popa, S., Martinez-Conesa, I.: Information technology, knowledge management and environmental dynamism as drivers of innovation ambidexterity: a study in SMEs. J. Knowl. Manag. (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1108/jkm-10-2017-0448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Stair, R., Reynolds, G.: Fundamentals of Information Systems. Cengage Learning, Boston (2017)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Thong, J.Y.: An integrated model of information systems adoption in small businesses. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 15, 187–214 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Tornatzky, L., Fleischer, M.: The Process of Technology Innovation. Lexingt Books, Lexington (1990). Trott, P.: The role of market research development of discontinuous new products. Eur. J. Innov. Manag. 4, 117–125 (2001)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Westrup, C., Jaghoub, S.A., Sayed, H.E., Liu, W.: Taking culture seriously: ICTs, cultures and development. In: Proceedings of IFIP WG9. 4 Working Conference on ICTs and Development: New Opportunities, Perspectives and Challenges (2018)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Zhao, L.: Study on online banking adoption and its predictors. In: 2010 Second International Conference on Multimedia and Information Technology (MMIT), pp 155–158. IEEE (2010)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Zouaghi, F., Sánchez, M., Martínez, M.G.: Did the global financial crisis impact firms’ innovation performance? The role of internal and external knowledge capabilities in high and low tech industries. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.01.011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Small and medium-sized enterprises and decent and productive employment creation. In: International Labour Conference (2015)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dominic Spalinger
    • 1
  • Stella Gatziu Grivas
    • 1
  • Andre de la Harpe
    • 2
  1. 1.University of Applied Science Northwest SwitzerlandWindischSwitzerland
  2. 2.Cape Peninsula University of TechnologyCape TownSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations