Advertisement

Stakeholder-Oriented and Enterprise Architecture Driven Cloud Service Selection

  • Sabrina KurjakovicEmail author
  • Knut Hinkelmann
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing book series (LNBIP, volume 339)

Abstract

In the last decade the number of cloud services has grown significantly. However, it is still a challenge for enterprises to describe functional requirements in a user-friendly way in order to select cloud services. This study introduces an approach to increase the practical relevance of business IT alignment research. We integrate insights from organizational buying behaviour into enterprise architecture modeling. The result consists of a concept and web-based platform. It enables business users without expert knowledge in modeling to exploit the potential of enterprise architecture for cloud service selection.

Keywords

Business IT alignment Enterprise architecture Cloud service selection Reference models 

References

  1. 1.
    Henderson, J.C., Venkatraman, H.: Strategic alignment: leveraging information technology for transforming organizations. IBM Syst. J. 32(1), 472–484 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sun, L., Dong, H., Hussain, F.K., Hussain, O.K., Chang, E.: Cloud service selection: state-of-the-art and future research directions. J. Netw. Comput. Appl. 45, 134–150 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    GetApp: Discover, Compare, and Choose the Best Business Apps (2018). getapp.com. Accessed 20 May 2018
  4. 4.
    Christensen, E., Curbera, F., Greg, M., Weerawarana, S.: Web Services Description Language (WSDL) 1.1. https://www.w3.org/TR/2001/NOTE-wsdl-20010315. Accessed 03 June 2018
  5. 5.
    Godse, M., Mulik, S.: An approach for selecting Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) product. In: CLOUD 2009 – 2009 IEEE International Conference on Cloud Computer, pp. 155–158 (2009)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Boussoualim, N., Aklouf, Y.: Evaluation and selection of SaaS product based on user preferences, pp. 299–308. IEEE, May 2015Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Limam, N., Boutaba, R.: Assessing software service quality and trustworthiness at selection time. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 36(4), 559–574 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Afify, Y.M., Moawad, I.F., Badr, N.L., Tolba, M.F.: A semantic-based Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) discovery and selection system. In: 8th International Conference on Computer Engineering and Systems, pp. 57–63, November 2013Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chen, Y., Zhu, Y.: SaaS vendor selection basing on analytic hierarchy process. In: Proceedings - 4th International Joint Conference on Computational Sciences and Optimization, CSO 2011, pp. 511–515 (2011)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Karim, R., Ding, C., Miri, A.: An end-to-end QoS mapping approach for cloud service selection. In: 2013 IEEE Ninth World Congress on Services, pp. 341–348 (2013)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wen, P.X., Dong, L.: Quality model for evaluating SaaS service. In: Proceedings - 4th International Conference on Emerging Intelligent Data and Web Technologies, EIDWT 2013, pp. 83–87 (2013)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rehman, Z.U., Hussain, O.K., Hussain, F.K.: User-side cloud service management: State-of-the-art and future directions. J. Netw. Comput. Appl. 55, 108–122 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ahlemann, F., Stettiner, E., Messerschmidt, M., Legner, C., Hobbs, G.: EAM governance and organisation. In: Ahlemann, F., Stettiner, E., Messerschmidt, M., Legner, C. (eds.) Strategic Enterprise Architecture Management. Management for Professionals, pp. 81–110. Springer, Heidelberg (2012).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-24223-6_4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sandkuhl, K., et al.: From expert discipline to common practice: a vision and research agenda for extending the reach of enterprise modeling. Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng. 60(1), 69–80 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Peffers, K., Tuunanen, T., Rothenberger, M.A., Chatterjee, S.: A design science research methodology for information systems research. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 24(3), 45–77 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Karagiannis, D., Kühn, H.: Metamodelling platforms. In: Proceedings of the Third International Conference EC-Web, no. 2455 (2002)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    The Open Group: ArchiMate 3.0.1 Specification (2018). http://pubs.opengroup.org/architecture/archimate3-doc/. Accessed 07 May 2018
  18. 18.
    Hinkelmann, K., Laurenzi, E., Lammel, B., Kurjakovic, S., Woitsch, R.: A semantically-enhanced modelling environment for business process as a service. In: 2016 4th International Conference on Enterprise Systems (ES), pp. 143–152 (2016)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Rosemann, M.: Application reference models and building blocks for management and control. In: Bernus, P., Nemes, L., Schmidt, G. (eds.) Handbook on Enterprise Architecture. International Handbooks on Information Systems, pp. 595–615. Springer, Heidelberg (2003).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-24744-9_17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Freitag, A.: Towards a theoretical foundation for business capabilities. In: Freitag, A. (ed.) Applying Business Capabilities in a Corporate Buyer M&A Process, pp. 64–104. Springer, Heidelberg (2015)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of CamerinoCamerinoItaly
  2. 2.FHNW University of Applied Sciences and Arts Northwestern SwitzerlandOltenSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations