Determinants for the Success of Software Startups: Insights from a Regional Cluster
In recent years, we have seen a growing interest in technology-based companies and intensive knowledge. Several regional clusters have appeared supported in dynamic entrepreneurial ecosystems which, alongside intrinsic aspects of the business, are important determinants of the success of new companies. However, most startups created in these innovation-oriented spaces do not survive the first years of life, due to the high competitiveness of the technological market, due to deficiencies in the business model, due to the support conditions provided by the surrounding ecosystem, and finally due to a weak adjustment between all these dimensions. Among several models available, the Early-Life Decision Model (ELDM) presents itself as an interesting framework for studying the development and success conditions of software companies. This article discusses the application of the ELDM based on a series of interviews conducted to 15 Portuguese software startups installed in a technological cluster located in the northeast of Portugal. Based on the results obtained, it was appropriate to add a new dimension to the ELDM model (learning) and complementing it with the perspectives of the business type and internal versus external determinants.
KeywordsSoftware development Startups Early-Life Decision Model Business model Technology clusters
This work was supported by COMPETE: POCI-01-0145-FEDER-007043 and FCT (Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia) within the Project Scope: UID/CEC/00319/2013.
- 3.Ries, E.: The Lean Startup: How Today’s Entrepreneurs Use Continuous Innovation to Create Radically Successful Businesses. Crown Publishing Group, New York (2011)Google Scholar
- 4.Osterwalder, A., Pigneur, Y.: Business Model Generation: A Handbook for Visionaries, Game Changers, and Challengers. Wiley, Hoboken (2010)Google Scholar
- 6.van Cann, R., Jansen, S., Brinkkemper, S.: Software business start-up memories: Key decisions in success stories. Palgrave Macmillan (2013)Google Scholar
- 7.Miettinen, O., Mazhelis, O., Luoma, E.: Managerial growth challenges in small software firms: a multiple-case study of growth-oriented enterprises. In: Tyrväinen, P., Jansen, S., Cusumano, M.A. (eds.) ICSOB 2010. LNBIP, vol. 51, pp. 26–37. Springer, Heidelberg (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13633-7_3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Hoch, D.J., Lindner, S.K., Roeding, C.R., Purkert, G.: Secrets of Software Success: Management Insights from 100 Software Firms Around the World. Harvard Business School Press, Massachusetts (2000)Google Scholar
- 9.Saunders, M., Lewis, P., Thornhill, A.: Research Methods for Business Students. Prentice Hall, New York (2009)Google Scholar
- 10.Instituto Empresarial do Minho: Innovation and entrepreneurship: 15 national success case studies. Technical report, IEMinho (2011) (in Portuguese)Google Scholar
- 13.Crowne, M., Why, : software product startups fail and what to do about it: Evolution of software product development in startup companies. In: IEEE International Engineering Management Conference (IEMC), vol. 1, pp. 338–343 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1109/IEMC.2002.1038454
- 14.Eisenhardt, K.M., Brown, S.L.: Time pacing: competing in markets that won’t stand still. Harv. Bus. Rev. 76(2), 59–69 (1998). https://hbr.org/1998/03/time-pacing-competing-in-markets-that-wont-stand-stillGoogle Scholar
- 15.MacCormack, A.: Product-development practices that work: How internet companies build software. MIT Sloan Manage. Rev. 42(2), 75–84 (2001)Google Scholar