Advertisement

From MVPs to Pivots: A Hypothesis-Driven Journey of Two Software Startups

  • Dron Khanna
  • Anh Nguyen-Duc
  • Xiaofeng Wang
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing book series (LNBIP, volume 336)

Abstract

Software startups have emerged as an interesting multiper-spective research area. Inspired by Lean Startup, a startup journey can be viewed as a series of experiments that validate a set of business hypotheses an entrepreneurial team make explicitly or inexplicitly about their startup. It is little known about how startups evolve through business hypothesis testing. This study proposes a novel approach to look at the startup evolution as a Minimum Viable Product (MVP) creating process. We identified relationships among business hypotheses and MVPs via ethnography and post-mortem analysis in two software startups. We observe that the relationship between hypotheses and MVPs is incomplete and non-linear in these two startups. We also find that entrepreneurs do learn from testing their hypotheses. However, there are hypotheses not tested by MVPs and vice versa, MVPs not related to any business hypothesis. The approach we proposed visualizes the flow of entrepreneurial knowledge across pivots via MVPs.

Keywords

Software startup Lean startup Entrepreneurial journey Minimum viable product Pivot 

References

  1. 1.
    Fletcher, D.E.: Entrepreneurial processes and the social construction of opportunity. Entrepreneurship Reg. Dev. 18(5), 21–440 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Song, M., Podoynitsyna, K., Van Der Bij, H., Halman, J.I.: Success factors in new ventures: a meta analysis. J. Prod. Innov. Manag. 25(1), 7–27 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Duc, A.N., Abrahamsson, P.: Minimum viable product or multiple facet product? the role of mvp in software startups. In: Sharp, H., Hall, T. (eds.) XP 2016. LNBIP, vol. 251, pp. 118–130. Springer, Cham (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33515-5_10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bajwa, S.S., Wang, X., Duc, A.N., Abrahamsson, P.: Failures to be celebrated: an analysis of major pivots of software startups. Empirical Softw. Eng. 22(5), 2373–2408 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sarasvathy, S.D.: Effectuation: Elements of Entrepreneurial Expertise. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham (2009)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Venkataraman, S., Sarasvathy, S.D., Dew, N., Forster, W.R.: Reflections on the 2010 AMR decade award: whither the promise? moving forward with entrepreneurship as a science of the artificial. Acad. Manag. Rev. 37(1), 21–33 (2012)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lichtenstein, B.B.: Generative Emergence: A New Discipline of Organizational, Entrepreneurial, and Social Innovation. Oxford University Press, New York (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ries, E.: The Lean Startup: How Today’s Entrepreneurs Use Continuous Innovation to Create Radically Successful Businesses. Crown Books, New York (2011)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Müller, R.M., Thoring, K.: Design thinking vs. lean startup: a comparison of two user-driven innovation strategies. In: Leading through Design, vol. 151 (2012)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Khanna, D.: Experiential team learning in software startups. In: International Conference on Agile Software Development. Springer, Cham (2018)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Basili, V.R., Selby, R.W., Hutchens, D.H.: Experimentation in software engineering. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 7, 733–743 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Blank, S.: The Four Steps to the Epiphany: Successful Strategies for Products that Win. BookBaby, Cork (2013)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Eisenmann, T., Ries, E., Dillard, S.: Hypothesis-driven entrepreneurship: the lean startup. Harvard Business School Entrepreneurial Management Case No. 812–095 (2012)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wang, X., Khanna, D., Abrahamsson, P.: Teaching lean startup at university: an experience report. In: International Workshop on Software Startups (IWSS) Co-located with 22nd ICE/IEEE International Technology Management Conference (2016)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Selden, P.D., Fletcher, D.E.: The entrepreneurial journey as an emergent hierarchical system of artifact-creating processes. J. Bus. Ventur. 30(4), 603–615 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Simon, H.A.: The Sciences of the Artificial. MIT Press, Cambridge (1996)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Nguyen Duc, A., Wang, X., Abrahamsson, P.: What Influences the Speed of Prototyping? An Empirical Investigation of Twenty Software Startups. Norwegian, Cologne (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lindgren, E., Münch, J.: Raising the odds of success: the current state of experimentation in product development. Inf. Softw. Technol. 77, 80–91 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Fagerholm, F., Guinea, A.S., Mäenpää, H., Münch, J.: Building blocks for continuous experimentation. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Rapid Continuous Software Engineering, pp. 26–35. ACM (2014)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Nguyen Duc, A., Seppänen, P., Abrahamsson, P.: Hunter-gatherer cycle: a conceptual model of the evolution of startup innovation and engineering. In: 1st Workshop on Open Innovation on Software Engineering, ICSSP (2015)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sharp, H., Dittrich, Y., De Souza, C.R.: The role of ethnographic studies in empirical software engineering. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 42(8), 786–804 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Fetterman, D.M.: Ethnography: Step-by-Step, vol. 17. Sage, Thousand Oaks (2010)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Reeves, S., Kuper, A., Hodges, B.D.: Qualitative research methodologies: ethnography. BMJ Br. Med. J. 337 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Passos, C., Cruzes, D.S., Dybå, T., Mendonça, M.: Challenges of applying ethnography to study software practices. In: 2012 ACM-IEEE International Symposium on IEEE Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement (ESEM), pp. 9–18 (2012)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Khanna, D., Mondini, M., Pantiuchina, J., Stillittano, G., Wang, X.: Experiment with MVPs: the First Startuppuccino Steps to a Lean Edtech Startup. In: Agilealliance (2017). https://www.agilealliance.org/resources/experience-reports/experiment-with-mvps/
  26. 26.
    Edison, H., Khanna, D., Bajwa, S.S., Brancaleoni, V., Bellettati, L.: Towards a software tool portal to support startup process. In: Abrahamsson, P., Corral, L., Oivo, M., Russo, B. (eds.) PROFES 2015. LNCS, vol. 9459, pp. 577–583. Springer, Cham (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26844-6_43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Myers, M.D., Newman, M.: The qualitative interview in IS research: examining the craft. Inf. Organ. 17(1), 2–26 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Runeson, P., Höst, M.: Guidelines for conducting and reporting case study research in software engineering. Empirical Softw. Eng. 14(2), 131 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Free University of Bozen-BolzanoBolzanoItaly
  2. 2.University of Southeast NorwayBø i TelemarkNorway

Personalised recommendations