Advertisement

Still an Era of Fragmented Authoritarian 1.0? A Probabilistic Crucial Case Analysis

  • Hans H. TungEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Politics and Development of Contemporary China book series (PDCC)

Abstract

Now that the concepts of authoritarian institutions and dictator’s growth curse have been properly given corresponding interpretations in China’s political context, this chapter adopts a probabilistic crucial case analysis to determine the composition of China’s sectoral players in the trade policy game and justifies my choice of who should and should not be included in it. It is precisely because of the analysis in this chapter that it makes sense for the narratives to zero in on the Communist Party of China central committee members’ promotion expectations within the hierarchy.

Bibliography

  1. Anderson, Jonathan. 2007. Is China Export-Led? UBS Investment Research.Google Scholar
  2. Chou, Chia-Chen, and Han-Pu Tung. 2009. Crossing the River by Feeling the Stones? The Case of the Labor Contract Law in China. In Toward Better Governance in China: An Unconventional Pathway of Political Reform, ed. Baogang Guo and Dennis Hickey. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  3. Cooney, Sean, Sarah Biddulph, Kungang Li, and Ying Zhu. 2007. China’s New Labour Contract Law: Responding to the Growing Complexity of Labour Relations in the PRC. UNSW Law Journal 30 (3): 788–803.Google Scholar
  4. Deng, Guosheng, and Scott Kennedy. 2010. Business and Industry Association Lobbying in China: The Paradox of Contrasting Styles. China Journal 63: 101–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Eckstein, Harry. 1975. Case Study and Theory in Political Science. In Handbook of Political Science, ed. F.I. Greenstein and N.W. Polsby, vol. 7. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  6. Gallagher, Mary, and Jonathan Hanson. 2015. Power Tool or Dull Blade? Resilient Autocracy and the Selectorate Theory. Annual Review of Political Science 18: 367–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gerring, John. 2007. Is There a (Viable) Crucial-Case Method. Comparative Political Studies 40 (3): 231–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hall, Peter A. 1993. Policy Paradigms, Social Learning, and the State: The Case of Economic Policymaking in Britain. Comparative Politics 25 (3): 275–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Heilmann, Sebastian. 2008. Policy Experimentation in China’s Economic Rise. Studies in Comparative International Development 43 (1): 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kaufman, Robert R. 1986. Liberalization and Democratization in South America: Perspectives from the 1970s. In Transitions from Authoritarian Rule: Comparative Perspectives, ed. Guillermo O’Donnell, Philippe Schmitter, and Laurence Whitehead. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Kennedy, Scott. 2005a. The Business of Lobbying in China. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. ———. 2005b. China’s Porous Protectionism: The Changing Political Economy of Trade Policy. Political Science Quarterly 120 (3): 407–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Levy, Jack S. 2002. Qualitative Methods in International Relations. In Millennial Reflections on International Studies, ed. Michael Brecher and Frank P. Harvey. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  14. Lieberthal, Kenneth G. 1992. Introduction: The “Fragmented Authoritarianism” Model and Its Limitations. In Bureaucracy, Politics, and Decision Making in Post-Mao China, ed. Kenneth Lieberthal and David Lampton. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  15. Lieberthal, Kenneth G., and David Lampton. 1992. Bureaucracy, Politics, and Decision Making in Post-Mao China. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  16. Lieberthal, Kenneth G., and Michel Oksenberg. 1988. Policy Making in China: Leaders, Structures, and Processes. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Lijphart, Arend. 1968. The Politics of Accommodation: Pluralism and Democracy in the Netherlands. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  18. McKeown, Timothy J. 1999. Case Studies and the Statistical Worldview: Review of King, Keohane, and Verba’s Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research. International Organization 53: 161–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Mertha, Andrew C. 2008. China’s Water Warriors: Citizen Action and Policy Change. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  20. ———. 2009. ‘Fragmented Authoritarianism 2.0’: Political Pluralization in the Chinese Policy Process. China Quarterly 200: 995–1012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Nathan, Andrew J. 2003. Authoritarian Resilience. Journal of Democracy 14 (1): 6–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ngok, Kinglun. 2008. The Changes of Chinese Labor Policy and Labor Legislation in the Context of Market Transition. International Labor and Working-Class History 73: 45–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Pearson, Margaret M. 2005. The Business of Governing Business in China: Institutions and Norms of the Emerging Regulatory State. World Politics 57 (2): 296–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Przeworski, Adam. 1986. Some Problems in the Study of the Transition to Democracy. In Transitions from Authoritarian Rule: Comparative Perspectives, ed. Guillermo O’Donnell, Philippe Schmitter, and Laurence Whitehead. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Putnam, Robert D. 1993. Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy with Robert Leonardi and Raffaella Y. Nanetti. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Reilly, Benjamin, and Robert Phillpot. 2002. ‘Making Democracy Work’ in Papua New Guinea: Social Capital and Provincial Development in an Ethnically Fragmented Society. Asian Survey 42 (6): 906–927.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Schmitter, Philippe C. 1974. Still the Century of Corporatism? Review of Politics 36 (1): 85–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Schwartz, Jonathan. 2004. Environmental NGOs in China: Roles and Limits. Pacific Affairs 77 (1): 28–49.Google Scholar
  29. Sekhon, Jasjeet S. 2004. Quality Meets Quantity: Case Studies, Conditional Probability, and Counterfactuals. Perspectives on Politics 2 (2): 281–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Shirk, Susan L. 1993. The Political Logic of Economic Reform in China. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  31. Westman, John. 1985. Modern Dependency: A ‘Crucial Case’ Study of Brazilian Government Policy in the Minicomputer Industry. Studies in Comparative International Development 20 (2): 25–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. White, Gordon. 1987. The Politics of Economic Reform in Chinese Industry: The Introduction of the Labour Contract System. China Quarterly 111: 365–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Xu, Hua, Yi Zeng, and Allen F. Anderson. 2005. Chinese NGOs in Action Against HIV/AIDS. Cell Research 15 (11–12): 914–918.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Zhu, Xufeng. 2008. Strategy of Chinese Policy Entrepreneurs in the Third Sector: Challenges of ‘Technical Infeasibility’. Policy Science 41: 315–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Political Science/Center for Research in Econometric Theory and ApplicationsNational Taiwan UniversityTaipeiTaiwan

Personalised recommendations