Advertisement

‘My Log Has a Message for You,’ or, Vibrant Matter and Twin Peaks: On Thing-Power and Subjectivity

  • Anthony Ballas
Chapter

Abstract

Jane Bennett’s neo-vitalism and Lynch’s strange materialism pose a problem for philosophy, namely what is to be done with the human subject? This chapter examines Twin Peaks: The Return for the purpose of locating and explicating the tension between subjectivity as espoused by psychoanalytic theory and the human–nonhuman assemblages of object-oriented ontology. The visual and narrative elements of The Return offer a conflicting discourse on both the potency and impotency of subjectivity, navigating the difficult terrain between human and non-human actants and the traditional correlationist subject/object model. By analyzing The Return, it is possible to articulate an object-oriented cinema that has hitherto been unidentified in film theory. However, rather than simply appealing to the object-oriented ontology, Lynch’s universe offers insight into its theoretical shortcomings.

References

  1. Bennett, Jane. 2004. ‘The Force of Things: Steps Toward an Ecology of Matter.’ Political Theory 32, no. 3: 347–372.Google Scholar
  2. ———. 2010. Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  3. ———. 2012. ‘Systems and Things: A Response to Graham Harman and Timothy Morton.’ New Literary History 42, no. 2: 225–233.Google Scholar
  4. ———. 2015. ‘Encounters with an Art Thing.’ Evental Aesthetics 3, no. 3: 91–110.Google Scholar
  5. Bryant, Levi. 2011. The Democracy of Objects. London: Open Humanities Press.Google Scholar
  6. Chenavier, Robert, and Bernard E. Doering. 2012. Simone Weil: Attention to the Real. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
  7. Freud, Sigmund. 1968. ‘Fetishism.’ In The Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, vol. XXI, translated by James Strachey, 147–157. London: Hogarth and Institute of Psycho-Analysis.Google Scholar
  8. Frost, Mark. 2017. Twin Peaks: The Final Dossier. New York: Flatiron Books.Google Scholar
  9. Harman, Graham. 2011. The Quadruple Object. Winchester, UK: Zero Books.Google Scholar
  10. Lacan, Jacques, and Jacques-Alain Miller. 2014. Anxiety. Cambridge, MA: Polity.Google Scholar
  11. Ling, Alex. 2013. Badiou and Cinema. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Lynch, David, dir. 1992. Twin Peaks: Fire Walk with Me. New Line Cinema.Google Scholar
  13. ———. 2014. Twin Peaks: The Missing Pieces. Paramount.Google Scholar
  14. ———. 2017. Twin Peaks: The Return. Showtime Entertainment.Google Scholar
  15. Meillassoux, Quentin. 2010. After Finitude: An Essay on the Necessity of Contingency. Translated by Ray Brassier. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  16. Saramago, José. 2013. ‘The Chair.’ In The Lives of Things: Short Stories, 1–25. New York: Verso.Google Scholar
  17. Teresa of Avila. 2012. The Interior Castle. Mineola, NY: Dover Thrift Editions.Google Scholar
  18. Žižek, Slavoj. 2000. The Art of the Ridiculous Sublime: On David Lynch’s Lost Highway. Seattle, WA: Walter Chapin Simpson Center for the Humanities, distributed by the University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
  19. ———. 2004. Organs Without Bodies: On Deleuze and Consequences. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  20. ———. 2013. Less Than Nothing: Hegel and the Shadow of Dialectical Materialism. New York: Verso.Google Scholar
  21. ———. 2017. Incontinence of the Void: Economico-Philosophical Spandrels. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  22. Zupančič, Alenka. 2017. What Is Sex? Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anthony Ballas
    • 1
  1. 1.DenverUSA

Personalised recommendations