Implementation Challenges

  • Alessandra JerollemanEmail author


This chapter builds upon the information provided in Chap.  4, with a focus on the actual implementation of policies and the resulting impacts of bureaucratic processes. The chapter argues that although the implementation of the current disaster policy and legislation has consistently led to the exacerbation of inequalities and unjust outcomes, there is a great deal that can be improved (or worsened) simply through the interpretation of the rules and regulations and the exercise of bureaucratic discretion—or perpetuation of administrative evil. The chapter describes some of the ways in which implementation practices and challenges lead to disparate outcomes, including the impacts of agency cultures that have become very focused on preventing excessive spending.

An additional implementation challenge stems from the reliance on private sector contractors, along with other partners, often utilizing contracting vehicles and other vehicles that create incentives for a focus on projects and applicants with more readily resolved cases.


Privatization Stafford Act Emergency Management Policy implementation Administrative evil Bureaucratic discretion 


  1. Bolin, R., & Bolton, P. (1986). Race, Religion, and Ethnicity in Disaster Recovery. Program on Environment and Behavioral Science, University of Colorado.Google Scholar
  2. Deseret News Editorial Board. (2018, June 8). In Our Opinion Disaster Relief Can Sometimes Be a Disaster. Retrieved from
  3. Formby, B. (2018, February 27). Abbot and FEMA Are Using Harvey to Reinvent Disaster Response. The Texas Tribune.Google Scholar
  4. Gotham, K. F. (2010). Disaster, Inc.: Privatization, Marketization, and Post-Katrina Rebuilding. Perspectives on Politics, 10(3), 633–646.Google Scholar
  5. Hatcher, L. J., Strother, L., Burnside, R., & Hughes, D. (2012). The USACE and Post-Katrina New Orleans: Demolition and Disaster Clean-Up. Journal of Applied Social Science, 6(2), 176–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Jerolleman, A. (2013). The Privatization of Hazard Mitigation: A Case Study of the Creation and Implementation of a Federal Program. University of New Orleans Theses and Dissertations. Paper 1692. Retrieved from
  7. Kamel, N. (2012). Social Marginalisation, Federal Assistance and Repopulation Patterns in the New Orleans Metropolitan Area following Hurricane Katrina. Urban Studies, 49(14), 3211–3231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Lipsky, M. (1980). Street-Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  9. Reardon, K. M., Green, R., Bates, L. K., & Kiely, R. C. (2009). Overcoming the Challenges of Post-Disaster Planning in New Orleans: Form the ACORN Housing University Collaborative. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 28, 391–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Sabatier, P. A. (1986). Top-Down and Bottom-Up Approaches to Implementation Research: A Critical Analysis and Suggested Synthesis. Journal of Public Policy, 6(1), 21–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Sloan, M., & Fowler, D. (2015). Lessons from Texas: 10 Years of Disaster Recovery Examined. Texas Appleseed.Google Scholar
  12. Sou, G., & Aponte-Gonzalez, F. (2017, December). Making Efforts Count After Irma and Maria: Household Relief and Recovery in Puerto Rico. University of Manchester, UK: Policy Brief.Google Scholar
  13. Vinik, D. (2018, May 29). ‘People Just Give Up’: Low-Income Hurricane Victims Slam Federal Relief Programs. Politico.Google Scholar
  14. WBAY. (2018, April 27). Hurricane Harvey Recovery Funds May Prioritize Wealthy, Advocates Say. Retrieved from
  15. Weissert, W., & Schmall, E. (2018, February 22). Texas’ Vow to Streamline Harvey Recovery and Aid Backfires. The Washington Post.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Jacksonville State UniversityMetairieUSA

Personalised recommendations