Energy Developers

  • Robert E. Forbis Jr.


Changes in domestic energy policy triggered heightened conflict and competition between the formerly allied, strong, and resource-rich members of the Bureau of Land Management’s (BLM) public lands subgovernment: energy and ranching. From the perspective of energy industry representatives, the heightened conflict and competition with ranching resulted from variety of conditions. In the opinion of these industry representatives, expansion of domestic energy development was the result of political willpower, energy market forces, and technological advancements. There are, however, differing opinions regarding the extent to which split-estate energy development triggered conflict and competition between itself and the ranching industry. While there is general consensus among industry representatives that expanding split-estate energy development did impact the stability of the energy-ranching alliance, there is disagreement concerning the extent to which the alliance has been strained. There is also disagreement regarding how or why the conflict with ranchers became as heightened as it did as split-estate energy development expanded across the Rocky Mountain West. Representatives of the energy industry clearly believe that split-estate energy development triggered conflict with their ranching brethren.


Energy lobby Bureau of Land Management Department of Interior Bureaucracy Split-estate energy development Surface Owner Protection Act 


  1. Dempsey, S. (2009). President of the Colorado Petroleum Association (CPA). Interview Conducted: March 24, 2009; Denver, CO.Google Scholar
  2. Gallagher, B. (2009). President of the New Mexico Oil and Gas Association (NMOGA). Interview Conducted: May 21, 2009; Albuquerque, NM.Google Scholar
  3. Hinchey, B. (2009). President of the Petroleum Association of Wyoming (PAW) and Former Speaker of the House, State of Wyoming Legislature. Interview Conducted: June 12, 2009; Casper, WY.Google Scholar
  4. Sgamma, K. (2009). Director of Government Affairs for the Independent Petroleum Association of Mountain States (IPAMS). Interview Conducted: March 24, 2009; Denver, CO.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert E. Forbis Jr.
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Political ScienceTexas Tech UniversityLubbockUSA

Personalised recommendations