Advertisement

Higher Education as a Service: The Science of Running a Lean Program in International Business

  • Joan Lofgren
  • Oleg V. Pavlov
  • Frank Hoy
Conference paper
Part of the Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics book series (SPBE)

Abstract

This chapter contributes to understanding higher education as a service by applying the service science framework to an undergraduate business program in northern Europe. We utilize the Service Science Canvas, which is a new tool for service science analysis. This innovative academic program relies exclusively on visiting faculty from around the world to teach intensive three-week courses. While access to resources and governance structures were found to be similar to business programs elsewhere, several elements were found to be highly unusual, if not unique. First, the intensive curriculum structure promotes value co-creation among faculty and students. Second, access rights to faculty are negotiated annually, leading to agility but also risk. Third, stakeholder networks are broadly dispersed, but on balance serving as a rich resource for the program. Governance has evolved to ensure quality standards in a constantly changing academic community.

References

  1. 1.
    Maglio PP, et al. Service systems, service scientists, SSME, and innovation. Commun ACM. 2006;49(7):81–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Spohrer J, et al. Steps toward a science of service systems. Computer. 2007;40(1):71–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lella, G., et al. Universities as complex service systems: External and Internal perspectives. In: IEEE international conference on service operations and logistics, and informatics (SOLI). 2012. Suzhou, China.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Spohrer J, et al. Service science: reframing progress with universities. Syst Res Behav Sci. 2013;30(5):561–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Pavlov O, Hoy F, Toward the service science of education. In: Maglio PP, et al., editors. Handbook of service science, vol. 2. Springer: New York; 2018.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ali F, et al. Does higher education service quality effect student satisfaction, image and loyalty? A study of international students in Malaysian public universities. Qual Assur Educ. 2016;24(1):70–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Knight J, Altbach P. The internationalization of higher education: motivations and realities. J Stud Int Educ. 2007;11:290–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Knight J. Internationalisation: key concepts and elements. In: Gaebel M, et al., editors. Internationalisation of European higher education. An EUA/ACA handbook. Raabe: Stuttgart; 2009.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lofgren J, Leigh E. The Mikkeli programme: international education and flagship response to globalisation. In: Nygaard C, Branch J, editors. Globalisation of higher education, the learning in higher education series, Institute for Learning in Higher Education. Libri: Faringdon; 2017.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Osterwalder A, Pigneur Y. Business model generation: a handbook for visionaries, game changers, and challengers. New York: Wiley; 2010.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Massy W. Reengineering the university: how to be mission centered, market smart, and margin conscious. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press; 2016.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Zaini R, et al. Let’s talk change in a university: a simple model for addressing a complex agenda. Syst Res Behav Sci. 2017;34(3):250–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Aalto University School of BusinessMikkeliFinland
  2. 2.Worcester Polytechnic InstituteWorcesterUSA

Personalised recommendations