Advertisement

Factors Influencing E-procurement Adoption in the Transportation Industry

  • Arim ParkEmail author
  • Soohyun Cho
  • Seongtae Kim
  • Yao Zhao
Conference paper
Part of the Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics book series (SPBE)

Abstract

On-demand matching services for commercial transportation needs have only recently entered the market in South Korea, with early players like Uber Freight and Convoy seeking new ways to curtail inefficiencies in the transportation sector. However, despite the availability of these services and the fact that advanced information technology can be readily applied in transportation-related fields, multiple factors, including negotiation power and inefficient matching rates between shippers and truckers, continue to influence transportation rates. With this in mind, we seek to conduct an empirical study by using logistic regression to identify the critical factors that might increase successful matching rates through the e-platform. Truckers consider travel time, fuel prices, truck and cargo types, load factor and O-D pairs to select a job when using the platform. They can use their search results to develop segmented operation strategies that vary according to the unique characteristics of individual truckers and shippers, the features of their services and other factors. By leveraging these and other aspects of the e-markets, truckers can expect to remain busy by filling any gaps in employment with the help of e-procurement.

References

  1. 1.
    McKinnon A. Life without trucks: the impact of a temporary disruption of road freight transport on a national economy. J Bus Logist. 2006;27(2):227–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hahn J, Sung HM, Park MC, Kho S, Kim D. Empirical evaluation on the efficiency of the trucking industry in Korea. KSCE J Civ Eng. 2015;19(4):1088–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Shin DS. Study on the efficiency of consignment contracts between goods carriers and drivers. J Transp Res. 1995;2:51–63.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
  5. 5.
    Zhang M, Huang GQ, Xu SX, Zhao Z. Optimization based transportation service trading in B2B e-commerce logistics. J Intell Manuf. 2016:1–17.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Nandiraju S, Regan A. Freight transportation electronic marketplaces: a survey of the industry and exploration of important research issues; 2008.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wang J, Liu D, Ip WH, Zhang W, Deters R. Integration of system-dynamics, aspect-programming, and object-orientation in system information modeling. IEEE Trans Ind Inf. 2014;10(2):847–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wang J, Wang H, Zhang W, Ip WH, Furuta K. On a unified definition of the service system: What is its identity? IEEE Syst J. 2014;8(3):821–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Caplice C. Electronic markets for truckload transportation. Prod Oper Manag. 2007;16(4):423–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
  11. 11.
    Basole RC, Karla J. Value transformation in the mobile service ecosystem: a study of app store emergence and growth. Serv Sci. 2012;4(1):24–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Scott A, Parker C, Craighead CW. Service refusals in supply chains: Drivers and deterrents of freight rejection. Transp Sci. 2017;51(4):1086–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Budak A, Ustundag A, Guloglu B. A forecasting approach for truckload spot market pricing. Transp Res Part A: Policy Pract. 2017;97:55–68.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Joo S, Min H, Smith C. Benchmarking freight rates and procuring cost-attractive transportation services. Int J Logist Manag. 2017;28(1):194–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Özkaya E, Keskinocak P, Joseph VR, Weight R. Estimating and benchmarking less-than-truckload market rates. Transp Res Part E: Logist Transp Rev. 2010;46(5):667–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Smith LD, Campbell JF, Mundy R. Modeling net rates for expedited freight services. Transp Res Part E Logist Transp Rev. 2007;43(2):192–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Arim Park
    • 1
    Email author
  • Soohyun Cho
    • 2
  • Seongtae Kim
    • 3
  • Yao Zhao
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Supply Chain ManagementRutgers UniversityNewarkUSA
  2. 2.Department of Accounting Information SystemRutgers UniversityNewarkUSA
  3. 3.Chair of Logistic Management, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology ZurichZurichSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations