Services Not Required? Assessing the Need for ‘Coordination Agencies’ During Disaster Response

  • Johanu BothaEmail author
Part of the Environmental Hazards book series (ENHA)


In the 1950s, North American disaster research, then encapsulated within sociology, identified the lack of interorganizational coordination as a fundamental barrier to effective disaster response. Consequently, the idea of a public agency tasked with coordinating those organizations engaged in disaster response emerged. Disaster research has since grown into a multidisciplinary endeavor that has largely affirmed the importance of some type of coordinating agency during the response phase. Jurisdictions across the United States and Canada have paralleled this academic concern by including some type of disaster response coordinating agency within their bureaucracies. However, the need for coordination agencies expressed in the literature and their prominence in actual bureaucracies does not by themselves mean that coordination agencies perform a fundamental function during disaster response. Some form of hypothesis testing where the impact of coordination agencies is the main object of study is required. Yet no extensive review of disaster case studies and response frameworks has been pursued with the explicit goal of assessing the efficacy of coordination agencies in actual disaster responses. This chapter provides – to the author’s knowledge – the first such review, where the different disciplines engaged in disaster research are kept in mind. It is shown that a discrepancy exists in the disaster literature between the ‘conceptual frameworks’ of ideal disaster response and the case studies of actual disaster events; unlike the assumption of the frameworks, the case studies demonstrate that the assumed importance of coordination agencies is unfounded.


Emergency management Institutions Coordination 


  1. Allison, G. (1971). Essence of decision. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
  2. Baker, G. W., & Chapman, D. W. (1962). Man and society in disaster. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  3. Barton, A. H. (1969). Communities in disaster: A sociological analysis of collective stress situations. Garden City: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  4. Beach, H. D., & Lucas, R. A. (1960). Individual and group behavior in a coal mine disaster. Washington, DC: National Academic of Sciences, National Research Council.Google Scholar
  5. Boin, A., & Hart, P. ‘t. (2007). The crisis approach. In H. Rodríguez, E. L. Quarantelli, & R. R. Dynes (Eds.), Handbook of disaster research. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  6. Cigler, B. A. (2009). Emergency management challenges for the Obama Presidency. International Journal of Public Administration, 32(9), 759–766.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Clarke, L. B. (1999). Mission improbable: Using fantasy documents to tame disaster. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  8. Comfort, L. K. (2007). Crisis management in hindsight: Cognition, communication, coordination, and control. Public Administration Review, 67, 189–197.Google Scholar
  9. Comfort, L. K., Waugh, W. L., & Cigler, B. A. (2012). Emergency management research and practice in public administration: Emergence, evolution, expansion, and future directions. Public Administration Review, 72(4), 539–547.Google Scholar
  10. Cutter, S. L., & Emrich, C. (2005). Are natural hazards and disaster losses in the U.S. increasing? EOS, Transactions American Geophysical Union, 86(41), 381, 388–389.Google Scholar
  11. Disaster Research Group, 1958. Behaviour in an Emergency Shelter: A Field Study of 800 Persons Stranded in a Highway Restaurant During a Heavy Snow Storm, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  12. Donahue, A. K., & Tuohy, R. V. (2006). Lessons never learned: A study of the lessons of disasters, why we repeat them and how we can learn from them. Homeland Security Affairs, 2(6), 1–28.Google Scholar
  13. Drabek, T. (2010). The human side of disaster. Boca Raton: CRC Press.Google Scholar
  14. Dynes, R. R. (1968). The functioning of expanding organizations in community disasters. Report series #2. Columbus, Ohio: Disaster Research Center. Ohio State University.Google Scholar
  15. Dynes, R. (1970). Organized behavior in disaster. Lexington: Heath Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  16. Farazmand, A. (2007). Learning from the Katrina crisis: A global and international perspective with implications for future crisis management. Public Administration Review, 67, 149–159. December: Special Issue.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Form, W., & Nosow, S. (1958). Community in disaster. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
  18. Fritz, C. E., (Disaster Research Group), et al. (1958). Behaviour in an emergency shelter: A field study of 800 persons stranded in a highway restaurant during a heavy snow storm. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences, National Research Group.Google Scholar
  19. Fritz, C. E., & Mathewson, J. H. (1957). Convergence behavior in disasters: A problem in social control. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences, National Research Council.Google Scholar
  20. Government of Canada. (n.d.). Emergency management organizations.
  21. Haddow, G., Bullock, J., & Coppola, D. P. (2008). Introduction to emergency management (3rd ed.). United Kingdom: Butterworth-Heinemann.Google Scholar
  22. Haddow, G., Bullock, J., & Coppola, D. P. (2013). Introduction to emergency management (5th ed.). Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.Google Scholar
  23. Handmer, J. & Dovers, S., 2013. Handbook of Disaster Policies and Institutions, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  24. Henstra, D. (2003). Federal emergency management in Canada and the United States after 11 September 2001. Canadian Public Administration, 46(1), 103–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kapucu, N. (2009). Leadership under stress: Presidential roles in emergency and crisis management in the United States. International Journal of Public Administration, 32(9), 767–772.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kapucu, N. (2012). Network governance in response to acts of terrorism: Comparative analyses. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  27. Kapucu, N., & Garayev, V. (2011). Collaborative decision-making in emergency and disaster management. International Journal of Public Administration, 34(6), 366–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kendra, J. M., Wachtendorf, T., & Quarantelli, E. L. (2003). The evacuation of Lower Manhattan by water transport on September 11: An unplanned success. Joint Commission of Quality and Safety, 29, 316–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kirschenbaum, A. (2004). Chaos organization and disaster management. New York: Marcel Dekker.Google Scholar
  30. Knowles, S. G. (2011). The disaster experts mastering risk in modern America. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
  31. Kuban, R. (1996). The role of government in emergency preparedness. Canadian Public Administration, 32(2. June), 239–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. La Porte, T. M. (2006). Organizational strategies for complex system resilience, reliability, and adaptation. In P. E. Auerswald, L. M. Branscomb, T. M. La Porte, & E. O. Michel-Kerjan (Eds.), Seeds of disaster, roots of response: How private action can reduce public vulnerability. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Lindell, M. K., Prater, C., & Perry, R. W. (2006). Introduction to emergency management. Hoboken: Wiley.Google Scholar
  34. Lindsay, J., 2014. The power to react: review and discussion of Canada’s emergency measures legislation. The International Journal of Human Rights, 18(2), pp.159–177. Available at: [Accessed November 5, 2014].Google Scholar
  35. McEntire, D. A. (2007). Disaster response and recovery: Strategies and tactics for resilience. Hoboken: Wiley.Google Scholar
  36. McGuire, M., & Silvia C. (2010). The effect of problem severity, managerial and organizational capacity, and agency structure on intergovernmental collaboration: Evidence from local emergency management. Public Administration Review. March|April.Google Scholar
  37. McLuckie, B. F. (1977) Italy, Japan and The United States: Effects of centralization on disaster responses 1964–1969. Disaster Research Center Historical and Comparative series no. 1.Google Scholar
  38. McNutt, P. (2002). The economics of public choice (2nd ed.). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publications.Google Scholar
  39. Meier, K. (1975). Representative bureaucracy: An empirical analysis. American Political Science Review, 69, 526–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Moore, H. E. (1958). Tornadoes over Texas: A study of Waco and San Angelo in disaster and its impact upon the study of disaster. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
  41. Moynihan, D. P. (2012). Extra-network organizational reputation and blame avoidance in networks: The hurricane Katrina example. Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions, 25(4), 567–588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Nirupama, N., & Etkin, D. (2009). Emergency managers in Ontario: An exploratory study of their perspective. Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management, 6(1), 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Perrow, C. (1984). Normal accidents: Living with high-risk technologies. New York: Basic Book.Google Scholar
  44. Perrow, C. (2007a). Disasters ever more? Reducing U.S. vulnerabilities. In H. Rodríguez, E. L. Quarantelli, & R. R. Dynes (Eds.), Handbook of disaster research. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  45. Perrow, C. (2007b). The next catastrophe: Reducing our vulnerabilities to natural, industrial, and terrorist disasters. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Perrow, C. (2008). Disasters evermore? Reducing our vulnerabilities to natural, industrial, and terrorist disasters. Social Research, 75(3 Fall, 2008), 1–20.Google Scholar
  47. Perry, R. W. (2007). What is a disaster? In H. Rodríguez, E. L. Quarantelli, & R. R. Dynes (Eds.), Handbook of disaster research. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  48. Poteyeva, M., Denver, M., Barsky, L. E., & Aguirre, B. E. (2007). Search and rescue activities in disasters. In H. Rodríguez, E. L. Quarantelli, & R. Dynes (Eds.), Handbook of disaster research (pp. 200–216). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Quarantelli, E. L., & Dynes, R. R. (1972). When disaster strikes (it isn’t much like what you’ve heard and read about). Psychology Today, 5, 66–70.Google Scholar
  50. Rosow, I. L. (1955). Conflict of authority in a natural disaster. Doctoral dissertation. Harvard University.Google Scholar
  51. Rubin, C. B. (2012). Emergency management: The American experience 1900–2010 (2nd ed.). Boca Raton: CRC Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Scanlon, J. (1982). The roller coaster story of civil defence planning in Canada. Emergency Planning Digest, 9(2), 2–14.Google Scholar
  53. Scanlon, J. (1992). Convergence revisited: A new perspective on a little studied topic. Boulder: The University of Colorado.Google Scholar
  54. Scanlon, J. (1995). Federalism and Canadian emergency response: Control, co-operation and conflict. The Australian Journal of Emergency Management, 10(1), 18–24.Google Scholar
  55. Scanlon, J. (1996). Help from the deep: The potential of ocean-based response to disaster. Disaster Prevention and Management, 5(3), 15–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Scanlon, J. (1998). Military support to civil authorities: The Eastern Ontario ice storm. Military Review, 4, 41–51.Google Scholar
  57. Scanlon, J. (1999). Emergent groups in established frameworks: Ottawa Carleton’s response to the 1998 ice disaster. Journal of Contingencies & Crisis Management, 7(1), 30–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Scanlon, J. (2002). Helping the other victims of September 11: Gander uses multiple EOCs to handle 38 diverted flights. Mass Emergencies and Disasters, 20(3), 369–398.Google Scholar
  59. Scanlon, J., Steele, E., & Hunsberger, A. (2012). By air, land and sea: Canada responds to Hurricane Katrina. Canadian Military Journal, 12(3), 54–62.Google Scholar
  60. Schroeder, A., Walmsley, G., & Ward, R. (2001). The evolution of emergency management in America: From a painful past to a promising but uncertain future. In A. Farazmand (Ed.), Handbook of crisis and emergency management. New York: Marcel Dekker.Google Scholar
  61. Seidman, H. (1998). Politics, position, and power: The dynamics of federal organizations (5th ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  62. Skertich, J., & Comfort. (2012). A bad time for disaster: Economic stress and disaster resilience. Administration and Society, 45, 2.Google Scholar
  63. Stephens, H. W., & Grant, G. O. (2001). A new use for an old model: Continuity of government as a framework for local emergency managers. In A. Farazmand (Ed.), Handbook of crisis and emergency management. New York: Marcel Dekker.Google Scholar
  64. Stern, E. K. (2009). Crisis navigation: Lessons from history for the crisis manager in chief. Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions, 22(2), 191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Tierney, K. (2007). Recent developments in U.S. homeland security policies and their implications for the management of extreme events. In H. Rodríguez, E. L. Quarantelli, & R. R. Dynes (Eds.), Handbook of disaster research. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  66. Tierney, K., Lindell, M. K., & Perry, R. W. (2001). Facing the unexpected: Disaster preparedness and response in the United States. Washington, DC: Joseph Henry Press.Google Scholar
  67. Voorhees, W. R. (2008). New Yorkers respond to the World Trade Center attack: An anatomy of an emergent volunteer organization. Journal of Contingencies & Crisis Management, 14(1), 3–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Wachtendorf, T. (2005). Suggestions for Canadian inter-organizational collaboration. Emergency Management Canada. Google Scholar
  69. Waugh Jr, W., & Streib G. (2006). Collaboration and leadership for effective emergency management. Public Administration Review. December: Special Issue.Google Scholar
  70. Waugh, W., Jr., & Tierney, K. (Eds.). (2007). Emergency management: Principles and practice for local government (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: International City Managers Association.Google Scholar
  71. Wenger, D., Quarantelli, E. L., & Dynes, R. R. (1986). Disaster analysis: Local emergency management offices and arrangements. Newark: University of Delware, DRC.Google Scholar
  72. Williams, B. H. (1956). Natural resources (Emergency management of the national economy). Economic Potential Branch, Industrial College of the Armed Forces.Google Scholar
  73. Wilson, J. Q. (1989). Bureaucracy: What government agencies do and why they do it. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  74. Zurcher, L. (1968). Social psychological functions of ephemeral roles: A disaster work crew. Human Organization, 27, 281–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Public Policy and AdministrationCarleton UniversityOttawaCanada

Personalised recommendations