ACCRA Project: Agile Co-Creation for Robots and Aging

  • Laura FioriniEmail author
  • Grazia D’Onofrio
  • Raffaele Limosani
  • Daniele Sancarlo
  • Antonio Greco
  • Francesco Giuliani
  • Antonio Kung
  • Paolo Dario
  • Filippo Cavallo
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering book series (LNEE, volume 540)


The mission of ACCRA (Agile Co-Creation for Robots and Aging) is to enable the development of advanced ICT Robotics based solutions for extending active and healthy aging in daily life by defining, developing and demonstrating an agile co-creation development process. ACCRA project consists of three robotic applications which aim to promote the independent living by means of personal mobility application, to support the daily life management thanks to housework application and to promote conversation rehabilitation tailored on personal attitude by means of dedicated software programme. Additionally, ACCRA project will be designed and developed on open source framework (i.e. ROS, FIWARE, universAAL and Rospex) to promote the interoperability among scientific community.


Service robotics Agile programming Co-creation Active aging 



This work was supported by the ACCRA Project, founded by the European Commission—Horizon 2020 Founding Programme (H2020-SCI-PM14-2016) and National Institute of Information and Communications Technology (NICT) of Japan under grant agreement No. 738251.


  1. 1.
    Eurostat. Population structure and ageingStatistics explained.
  2. 2.
    Innovation for age-friendly buildings, cities and environments.
  3. 3.
    van den Broek, G., Cavallo, F., & Wehrmann, C. (2010). AALIANCE ambient assisted living roadmap.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fiorini, L., Esposito, R., Bonaccorsi, M., Petrazzuolo, C., Saponara, F., Giannantonio, R., et al. (2017). Enabling personalised medical support for chronic disease management through a hybrid robot-cloud approach. Autonomous Robot, 41, 1263–1276. Scholar
  5. 5.
    Czaja, S. J. (2016). Long-term care services and support systems for older adults: The role of technology. American Psychologist, 71, 294–301. Scholar
  6. 6.
    Esposito, R., Fiorini, L., Limosani, R., Bonaccorsi, M., Manzi, A., Cavallo, F., & Dario, P. (2015). Supporting active and healthy aging with advanced robotics integrated in smart environment.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Suzuki, R., & Lee, J. (2016). Robot-play therapy for improving prosocial behaviours in children with Autism Spectrum Disorders. In International Symposium on Micro-NanoMechatronics and Human Science (MHS). (pp. 1–5. IEEE).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ferri, G., Mondini, A., Manzi, A., & Mazzolai, B. (2010). DustCart, a mobile robot for urban environments: Experiments of pollution monitoring and mapping during autonomous navigation in urban scenarios. Environments, 3.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cavallo, F., Limosani, R., Fiorini, L., Esposito, R., Furferi, R., Governi, L., & Carfagni, M. (2018). Design impact of acceptability and dependability in assisted living robotic applications. International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing, 1–12. Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kittmann, R., Fröhlich, T., Schäfer, J., Reiser, U., Weißhardt, F., & Haug, A. (2015). Let me introduce myself: I am Care-O-bot 4, a gentleman robot. In: Mensch und Computer 2015 Tagungsband (pp. 223–232). Stuttgart: Oldenbourg Wissenschaftsverlag.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Tanaka, F., Isshiki, K., Takahashi, F., Uekusa, M., Sei, R., & Hayashi, K. (2015). Pepper learns together with children: Development of an educational application. In: 2015 IEEE-RAS 15th International Conference on Humanoid Robots (Humanoids) (pp. 270–275, IEEE).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bluefrog: Bluefrog robotics official website.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Roomba Robot official website.
  14. 14.
    Sancarlo, D., D’Onofrio, G., Oscar, J., Ricciardi, F., Casey, D., Murphy, K., ... & Greco, A. (2016, June). MARIO project: A multicenter survey about companion robot acceptability in caregivers of patients with dementia. In Italian forum of ambient assisted living (pp. 311–336). Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Khosla, R., Nguyen, K., & Chu, M.-T. (2017). Human robot engagement and acceptability in residential aged care. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 33, 510–522. Scholar
  16. 16.
    Moschetti, A., Fiorini, L., Aquilano, M., Cavallo, F., & Dario, P.: Preliminary findings of the AALIANCE2 ambient assisted living roadmap. In Ambient assisted living (pp. 335–342). Cham: Springer International Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sugiura, K., & Zettsu, K. (2015). Rospeex: A cloud robotics platform for human-robot spoken dialogues. In 2015 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) (pp. 6155–6160). IEEE.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Grönroos, C., & Voima, P. (2013). Critical service logic: Making sense of value creation and co-creation. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 41, 133–150. Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ramesh, B., Mohan, K., & Cao, L. (2012). Ambidexterity in Agile distributed development: An empirical investigation. Information Systems Research, 23, 323–339. Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lusch, R. F., & Nambisan, S. (2015). Service innovation: A service-dominant logic perspective. MIS Quarterly, 39, 155–175. Scholar
  21. 21.
    Prahalad, C. K., Ramaswamy, V. (2004). The future of competition: Co-creating unique value with customers. Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Barlow, J. B., Giboney, J., Keith, M. J., Wilson, D., Schuetzler, R. M., Lowry, P. B., & Vance, A. (2011). Overview and guidance on agile development in large organizations. Ssrn.
  23. 23.
    Beck, K., Beedle, M., Van Bennekum, A., Cockburn, A., Cunningham, W., Fowler, M., Grenning, J., …, Thomas, D.: Manifesto for agile software development twelve principles of agile software.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Cao, H. L., Esteban, P. G., De Beir, A., Simut, R., Van De Perre, G., Lefeber, D., & Vanderborght, B.: ROBEE: A homeostatic-based social behavior controller for robots in human-robot interaction experiments. In 2014 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics, IEEE ROBIO 2014.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Vargo, S. L., Lusch, R. F., Akaka, M. A., He, Y. (2008). Service-dominant logic—A review and assessment.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kaasinen, E., & Koskela-Huotari, K. (2013). Three approaches to co-creating services with users. Advances in the Human Side of Service Engineering, 286, 4343–4352.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Harrisson, D., & Vezina, M. (2006). L’INNOVATION SOCIALE: UNE Introduction. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 77, 129–138. Scholar
  28. 28.
    SCRUM official website,
  29. 29.
    Kidholm, K., Clemensen, J., Caffery, L. J., & Smith, A. C. (2017). The model for assessment of telemedicine (MAST): A scoping review of empirical studies. Journal of telemedicine and telecare, 23, 803–813. Scholar
  30. 30.
    Kehoe, B., Patil, S., Abbeel, P., & Goldberg, K. (2015). A survey of research on cloud robotics and automation. IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, 12, 398–409. Scholar
  31. 31.
    Limosani, R., Manzi, A., Fiorini, L., Dario, P., & Cavallo, F. (2019). Connecting ROS and FIWARE: Concepts and tutorial. In Robot operating system (ROS) (pp. 449–475). Cham: Springer.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The BioRobotics Institute, Scuola Superiore Sant’AnnaPontedera (PI)Italy
  2. 2.Complex Unit of Geriatrics, Department of Medical SciencesIRCCS “Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza”FoggiaItaly
  3. 3.ICT, Innovation and Research UnitIRCCS “Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza”FoggiaItaly
  4. 4.TrialogParisFrance

Personalised recommendations