Advertisement

ReMoVES Remote Monitoring Validation Engineering System: New Way of Care

  • Elisa Ferrara
  • Serena Ponte
  • Matteo Morando
  • Silvana DellepianeEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering book series (LNEE, volume 540)

Abstract

Customization of the rehabilitation program and patient monitoring involve gathering user and process-related information during the rehabilitation, which is then used to appropriately adapt procedures and services in order to satisfactorily enhance the user’s experience. User satisfaction is the ultimate aim of customization along with clinical effectiveness. Case-based reasoning will help in further improving the rehabilitation process by either exploiting temporal profile evolution of the same patient or retrieving and processing information related to similar patients. To this end, thinking to a personalized and remote monitoring service available at patient’s home could be a solution to extend the possibility of treatment to a wider population, in an easy and comfortable way, at a good price. The aim of this study is to present REmote MOnitoring Validation Engineering System (ReMoVES) platform: the proposed system addresses the problem of continuity of care in a smart and economical way within the rehabilitation field. The proposed solution has been favourably accepted by patients, who showed interest and involvement during tests conducted at rehabilitation facilities, as well as by therapists who have found ReMoVES a useful tool for assessing and monitoring the patient.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to Dott.ssa Marina Simonini (La Colletta Hospital (Arenzano–Genova)), Dott.ssa Francesca Cecchi (Don Carlo Gnocchi Foundation (Fivizzano–Massa Carrara), and the medical and physiotherapist staff for supporting the experimental procedures and patients recruitment.

References

  1. 1.
    Maule, J., & Chestnutt, L. (1999). Telemedicine in the 21st Century: Opportunities for Citizens, Society and Industry: An International Space University Workshop, November 4–5, 1999, Hilton Hotel, Strasbourg, FranceGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ferrara, E., Nardotto, S., Ponte, S., & Dellepiane, S. G. (2014). Infrastructure for data management and user centered rehabilitation in Rehab@Home project. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments (Vol. 21). ACMGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Deutsch, J. E., Brettler, A., Smith, C., Welsh, J., John, R., Guarrera-Bowlby, P., et al. (2011). Nintendo Wii sports and Wii fit game analysis, validation, and application to stroke rehabilitation. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation, 18(6), 701–719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Stroke Engine. Heart & Stroke Foundation, Canadian Partnership for Stroke Recovery. Retrieved October 23, 2017, from https://www.strokengine.ca/en/about-stroke-engine/.
  5. 5.
    Sin, H., & Lee, G. (2013). Additional virtual reality training using xbox kinect in stroke survivors with hemiplegia. American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 92(10), 871–880.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fritz, S. L., Peters, D. M., Merlo, A. M., & Donley, J. (2013). Active video-gaming effects on balance and mobility in individuals with chronic stroke: A randomized controlled trial. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation, 20(3), 218–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Webster, D., & Celik, O. (2014). Systematic review of kinect applications in elderly care and stroke rehabilitation. Journal of Neuroengineering and Rehabilitation, 11(1), 108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    ReMoVES Official Website. Solution for home rehabilitation and monitoring. Retrieved October 23, 2017, from https://www.removes.eu.
  9. 9.
    Ponte, S., Gabrielli, S., Jonsdottir, J., Morando, M., & Dellepiane, S. (2015). Monitoring game-based motor rehabilitation of patients at home for better plans of care and quality of life. In 37th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC), 2015 (pp. 3941–3944). IEEE.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Flores, E., Tobon, G., Cavallaro, E., Cavallaro, F. I., Perry, J. C., & Keller, T. (2008). Improving patient motivation in game development for motor deficit rehabilitation. In Proceedings of the 2008 International Conference on Advances in Computer Entertainment Technology (pp. 381–384). ACM.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gardner, M., Metsis, V., Becker, E., & Makedon, F. (2013). Modeling the effect of attention deficit in game-based motor ability assessment of cerebral palsy patients. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments (Vol. 65). ACM.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Laver, K., George, S., Thomas, S., Deutsch, J. E., & Crotty, M. (2012). Virtual reality for stroke rehabilitation. Stroke, 43(2), e20–e21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Saposnik, G., Teasell, R., Mamdani, M., Hall, J., McIlroy, W., Cheung, D., et al. (2010). Effectiveness of virtual reality using Wii gaming technology in stroke rehabilitation. Stroke, 41(7), 1477–1484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Drachen, A., Nacke, L. E., Yannakakis, G., & Pedersen, A. L. (2010). Correlation between heart rate, electrodermal activity and player experience in first-person shooter games. In Proceedings of the 5th ACM SIGGRAPH Symposium on Video Games (pp. 49–54). ACM.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Elisa Ferrara
    • 1
  • Serena Ponte
    • 1
  • Matteo Morando
    • 1
  • Silvana Dellepiane
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.DITEN, Università degli Studi di GenovaGenoaItaly

Personalised recommendations