Advertisement

Can One Speak of Teleology In Plato?

  • Luc BrissonEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Philosophical Studies Series book series (PSSP, volume 139)

Abstract

“Teleology,” a word invented in 1728 by Christian Wolff, has become a magic formula among those who are interested in Plato, Aristotle, and even the Stoics. Among our contemporaries, “teleology” in fact enables modern physical theories based on mechanical necessity to be opposed to ancient explanations that try to master chance by means of a good and benevolent intellect. The question in this paper will be to determine whether this explanation, which refers above all to Aristotle’s doctrine of causes and more precisely to the final cause, can be found in Plato’s Timaeus.

Keywords

Plato Aristotle Wolff Teleology Timaeus Forms Khôra Demiurge Causes Nature Technique 

References

  1. Baltes, M. (1996). Gégonen (Platon, Tim. 28b7). Ist die Welt real entstanden oder nicht? In K. Algra, P. W. Van der Horst, & D. Runia (Eds.), Polyhistor. Studies in the history of ancient philosophy, presentend to Jaap Mansfeld. Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill.Google Scholar
  2. Betegh, G. (2009). Tale, theology and teleology in the Phaedo. In C. Partenie (Ed.), Plato’s myths (pp. 77–100). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Brisson, L. (1974) Le Même et l’Autre dans la structure ontologique du Timée de Platon. Un commentaire systématique du Timée de Platon. Reprinted Sankt Augustin: Academia, 1998.Google Scholar
  4. Brisson, L. (1996). La notion philosophique de phthónos chez Platon. Reprinted in Lectures de Platon (pp. 219–234). Paris, France: Vrin, 2000.Google Scholar
  5. Brisson, L. (1997). Aristote, Physique IV 2. Reprinted in Lectures de Platon (pp. 99–110). Paris, France: Vrin, 2000.Google Scholar
  6. Brisson, L. (1999a). Plato’s theory of sense perception in the Timaeus. How it works and what it means [1997]. In J. Cleary & G. Gurtler (Eds.), Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy 13 (pp. 147–176). New York, NY: University Press of America.Google Scholar
  7. Brisson, L. (1999b). Un si long anonymat. In J.-M. Narbonne, & L. Langlois (Eds.), La métaphysique. Son histoire, sa critique, sesenjeux (pp. 37–60) [Actes du Congrès de l’Association des Sociétés de Philosophie de Langue Française, Université Laval-Québec, 18–24 août 1998]. Paris, France: Vrin/Québec, Presses de l’Université Laval.Google Scholar
  8. Brisson, L. (2003). How and why do the building blocks of the universe change constantly in Plato’s Timaeus (51a-61c)? In Plato Physicus. Cosmologia e antropologia nel Timeo, a cura di Carlo Natali e Stefano Maso (pp. 189–204). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Hakkert.Google Scholar
  9. Brisson, L. (2011). La “matière” chez Platon et dans la tradition platonicienne. In Materia. XIII Colloquio Internazionale [Roma, 7-8-9 gennaio 2010], Atti a cura di Delfina Giovannozzi e Marco Veneziani, Firenze, Leo S. Olschki editore (pp. 1–40) [Lessico Intellettuale Europeo].Google Scholar
  10. Brisson, L. (2012). Why is the Timaeus called an eikôs muthos and an eikôs logos? In C. Collobert, P. Destrée, & F. J. Gonzalez (Eds.), Plato and Myth. Studies in the use and status of Platonic myths (pp. 369–391). Boston, MA: Brill.Google Scholar
  11. Brisson, L. (2013). Clement and Cyril of Alexandria: Confronting Platonism with Christianism. In M. Vinzent (Eds.), Studia Patristica. Papers presented at the sixtieth international Conference on Patristic Studies held in Oxford 2011 (Vol. 6, pp. 19–44), Studia patristica 58. Neoplatonism and Patristics. Leuven, Belgium: Peeters.Google Scholar
  12. Broadie, S. (2012). Nature and divinity in Plato’s Timaeus. Cambridge, London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Brumbaugh, R. S. (1976). Plato’s relation to the arts and crafts. In W. H. Werkmeister (Ed.), Facets of Plato’s philosophy (pp. 40–52). Assen, The Netherlands: Van Gorcum [Phronesis, Suppl. II].Google Scholar
  14. Burnyeat, M. F. (2005). Eikos muthos. Rhizai, 2, 143–165.Google Scholar
  15. Carone, G. R. (1994–1995). Teleology and evil in Laws 10. Review of Metaphysics, 48, 275–298.Google Scholar
  16. Chen, C. H. (1961). Plato’s theistic teleology. Anglican Theological. Review, 43, 71–87.Google Scholar
  17. Cherniss, H. F. (1994). Aristotle’s criticism of Plato and the Academy. New York, NY: Russell & Russell Appendix XI.Google Scholar
  18. Cooper, J. M. (1982). Aristotle on natural teleology. In M. Schofield & M. C. Nussbaum (Eds.), Language and logos Studies in Ancient Greek Philosophy presented to G.E. L Owen (pp. 197–222). Cambridge, England: Owen.Google Scholar
  19. Cornford, F. M. (1937). Plato’s cosmology. London, England: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  20. Cresswell, M. J. (1971). Plato’s theory of causality. Phaedo 95-106. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 19, 244–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ferrari, F. (2003). Causa paradigmatica e causa efficiente. Il ruolo delle idee nel Timeo. In Plato Physicus. Cosmologia e antropologia nel Timeo, a cura di Carlo Natali e Stefano Maso (pp. 83–96). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Hakkert.Google Scholar
  22. Franklin, L. (2005). ‘Techne’ and teleology in Plato’s Gorgias. Apeiron, 38, 229–255.Google Scholar
  23. Frede, M. (1980). The original notion of cause. In M. Schofield, M. Burnyeat, & J. Barnes (Eds.), Doubt and dogmatism: Studies in Hellenistic epistemology (pp. 217–249, esp. 222–223). Oxford, England: Clarendon.Google Scholar
  24. Graham, D. W. (1991). Socrates, the craft analogy, and science. Apeiron, 24, 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hackforth, R. (1965). Plato’s theism. In R. E. Allen (Ed.), Studies in Plato’s metaphysics (pp. 439–447). London, England: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  26. Johansen, T. K. (2003). The place of the demiurge in Plato’s teleology. In C. Natali & S. Maso (Eds.), Plato physicus. Cosmologia e antropologia nel Timeo (pp. 83–96). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Hakkert.Google Scholar
  27. Johansen, T. K. (2004). Plato’s natural philosophy. A study of the Timaeus-Critias. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Lennox, J. (1985). Plato’s unnatural teleology. In D. J. O’Meara (Ed.), Platonic investigations (pp. 195–218). Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America.Google Scholar
  29. Mackenzie, M. M. (1988). Impasse and explanation: from the Lysis to the Phaedo. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie, 70, 15–45.Google Scholar
  30. Menn, S. (1995). Plato on God as Nous. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press [The Journal of the History of Philosophy Monograph Series].Google Scholar
  31. Meyerstein, F. W., & Brisson, L. (1991). Inventer l’univers. Le problème de la connaissance et les modèles cosmologiques, Collection “L’âne d’or” 1. Paris, France: Les Belles Lettres. English translation under the title Inventing the Universe, Albany, NY: SUNY Press, 1995.Google Scholar
  32. Natali, C., & Maso, S. (1999). Antiaristotelismo. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Hakkert.Google Scholar
  33. Natali, C., & Maso, S. (2003). Plato physicus. Cosmologia e Antropologia nel Timeo. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Hakkert.Google Scholar
  34. Natali, C., & Maso, S. (2005). La catena delle cause. Determinismo e antideterminismo nel pensiero antico e in quello contemporaneo. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Hakkert.Google Scholar
  35. Natali, C., & Maso, S. (2010). La scienza e le cause a partire dalla Metafisica di Aristotele, a cura di Francesco Fronterotta. Napoli, Italy: Bibliopolis. [Elenchos: collana di testi e studi sul pensiero antico 54].Google Scholar
  36. Payne, A. (2008). The teleology of the ascent in Plato’s Symposium (210a-212b). Apeiron, 41, 123–146.Google Scholar
  37. Philonenko, A. (1978). L’antinomie du jugement téléologique. In Revue de métaphysique et de morale (p. 82).Google Scholar
  38. Sedley, D. (1989). Teleology and myth in the Phaedo. Boston Area Colloquium, 5, 359–383.Google Scholar
  39. Sedley, D. (2007). Creationism, and its critics in antiquity. London, England: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  40. Sedley, D. N. (2008). Socrates’ place in the history of teleology. Elenchos, 29, 317–334.Google Scholar
  41. Strange, S. K. (1985). The double explanation in the Timaeus. Ancient Philosophy, 5, 25–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Wiggins, D. (1986). Teleology and the good in Plato’s Phaedo. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, 4, 1–18.Google Scholar
  43. Woodfield, A. (1976). Teleology. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre Jean Pépin (UMR 8230) CNRS-ENSParisFrance

Personalised recommendations