Advertisement

Introduction: Analyzing the Nexus Between Populism and International Relations

  • Frank A. StengelEmail author
  • David B. MacDonald
  • Dirk Nabers
Chapter
Part of the Global Political Sociology book series (GLPOSO)

Abstract

Although populism research has become somewhat of a cottage industry in recent years, the phenomenon’s international or global aspects remain yet to be explored. While populism researchers have mainly focused on theoretical and methodological issues, or studied individual cases (whether in single case studies or in a comparative fashion), International Relations scholars have, aside from not even a handful of studies, until recently ignored the phenomenon. With the election of Donald J. Trump to the US presidency, the need for research on the nexus between populism and world politics has become blatantly obvious. This introduction (1) explores the disconnect between populism research and IR, (2) makes the case for an increased engagement between the two, highlighting populism’s potential impact on foreign policy, international cooperation and conflict, regional and world order (s) as well as international effects on populist successes (“second image reversed”), (3) provides an overview of the chapters of the volume and situates their individual contributions within the larger framework of the populism-world politics nexus.

Keywords

Populism Foreign policy analysis World politics World order International Relations 

References

  1. Adler, Emanuel, and Michael Barnett (eds.). 1998. Security Communities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Ahluwalia, Pal, and Toby Miller. 2016. Brexit: The Way of Dealing with Populism. Social Identities 22 (5): 453–454.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13504630.2016.1186635.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arditi, Benjamin. 2007. Politics on the Edges of Liberalism: Difference, Populism, Revolution, Agitation: Difference, Populism, Revolution, Agitation. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Athanassiou, Cerelia. 2012. ‘Gutsy’ Decisions and Passive Processes. International Feminist Journal of Politics 16 (1): 6–25.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14616742.2012.741428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Augstein, Jakob. 2016. Gefahren für die Demokratie: Trump beim Namen nennen. Der Spiegel. Online, November 11. http://www.spiegel.de/politik/deutschland/donald-trump-wie-seine-wahl-die-demokratie-gefaehrdet-kolumne-a-1121716.html.
  6. Bakker, Bert N., Matthijs Rooduijn, and Gijs Schumacher. 2016. The Psychological Roots of Populist Voting: Evidence from the United States, the Netherlands and Germany. European Journal of Political Research 55 (2): 302–320.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Batory, Agnes. 2016. Populists in Government? Hungary’s “System of National Cooperation”. Democratization 23 (2): 283–303.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2015.1076214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bell, Duncan. 2002. Anarchy, Power and Death: Contemporary Political Realism as Ideology. Journal of Political Ideologies 7 (2): 221–239.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13569310220137557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bially Mattern, Janice. 2005. Ordering International Politics: Identity, Crisis, and Representational Force. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Block, Elena, and Ralph Negrine. 2017. The Populist Communication Style: Toward a Critical Framework. International Journal of Communication 11: 178–197.Google Scholar
  11. Bloodgood, Elizabeth A. 2011. The Interest Group Analogy: International Non-governmental Advocacy Organisations in International Politics. Review of International Studies 37 (1): 93–120.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210510001051.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Böhmelt, Tobias, Lawrence Ezrow, Roni Lehrer, and Hugh Ward. 2016. Party Policy Diffusion. American Political Science Review 110 (2): 397–410.  https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055416000162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bonacker, Thorsten, André Brodocz, Werner Distler, and Katrin Travouillon. 2014. Deutungsmacht in Nachkriegsgesellschaften. ZIB Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen 21 (2): 7–36.  https://doi.org/10.5771/0946-7165-2014-2-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bonacker, Thorsten, and Matthias Ecker-Ehrhardt. 2013. Entstehung und Zerfall von Autorität in der Weltpolitik. Eine differenzierungstheoretische Perspektive. In Ordnung und Wandel in der Weltpolitik: Konturen einer Soziologie der Internationalen Beziehungen, ed. Stephan Stetter, 151–176. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Boyle, Michael J. 2016. The Coming Illiberal Order. Survival 58 (2): 35–66.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00396338.2016.1161899.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Brewer, Mark D. 2016. Populism in American Politics. The Forum 14 (3): 249–264.  https://doi.org/10.1515/for-2016-0021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Brooks, Stephen G., G. John Ikenberry, and William C. Wohlforth. 2012. Don’t Come Home, America: The Case Against Retrenchment. International Security 37 (3): 7–51.  https://doi.org/10.1162/ISEC_a_00107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Brown, Wendy. 2015. Undoing the Demos: Neoliberalism’s Stealth Revolution. New York: Zone Books.Google Scholar
  19. Buzogány, Aron. 2017. Illiberal Democracy in Hungary: Authoritarian Diffusion or Domestic Causation? Democratization 24 (7): 1307–1325.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2017.1328676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Byman, Daniel L., and Kenneth M. Pollack. 2001. Let Us Now Praise Great Men: Bringing the Statesman Back In. International Security 25 (4): 107–146.  https://doi.org/10.1162/01622880151091916.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Campbell, David. 1998. Writing Security: United States Foreign Policy and the Politics of Identity, Rev ed. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  22. Canovan, Margaret. 2002. Taking Politics to the People: Populism as the Ideology of Democracy. In Democracies and the Populist Challenge, ed. Yves Mény and Yves Surel, 25–44. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Chacko, P., and K. Jayasuriya. 2017. Trump, the Authoritarian Populist Revolt and the Future of the Rules-Based Order in Asia. Australian Journal of International Affairs 71 (2): 121–127.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10357718.2016.1266463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Chryssogelos, Angelos. 2017. Populism in Foreign Policy. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics, ed. William R. Thompson. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Colgan, Jeff D., and Robert O. Keohane. 2017. The Liberal Order Is Rigged. Foreign Affairs 96 (3): 36–44.Google Scholar
  26. Coolidge, Frederick L., and Daniel L. Segal. 2007. Was Saddam Hussein Like Adolf Hitler? A Personality Disorder Investigation. Military Psychology 19 (4): 289–299.  https://doi.org/10.1080/08995600701548221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Crouch, Colin. 2004. Post-democracy. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  28. Daase, Christopher, and Nicole Deitelhoff. 2015. Jenseits der Anarchie: Widerstand und Herrschaft im internationalen System. Politische Vierteljahresschrift 56 (2): 299–318.  https://doi.org/10.5771/0032-3470-2015-2-299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Decker, Frank. 2016. Die » Alternative für Deutschland « aus der vergleichenden Sicht der Parteienforschung. In Die Alternative für Deutschland: Programmatik, Entwicklung und politische Verortung, ed. Alexander Häusler, 7–23. Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. De Luce, Dan, and Paul McLeary. 2016. Trump Is Ready to Say ‘You’re Fired’ to NATO. Foreign Policy, July 21. https://foreignpolicy.com/2016/07/21/trump-is-ready-to-say-youre-fired-to-nato/.
  31. Deitelhoff, Nicole, and Christopher Daase. 2015. Herrschaftszeiten. Internationale Politische Theorie als Gesellschaftstheorie der internationalen Beziehungen. Zeitschrift für Politische Theorie 6 (2): 141–158.  https://doi.org/10.3224/zpth.v6i2.22874.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Diez, Thomas. 2004. Europe’s Others and the Return of Geopolitics. Cambridge Review of International Affairs 17 (2): 319–335.  https://doi.org/10.1080/0955757042000245924.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Diez, Thomas. 2013. Normative Power as Hegemony. Cooperation and Conflict 48 (2): 194–210.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0010836713485387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Engelkamp, Stephan, and Katharina Glaab. 2015. Writing Norms: Constructivist Norm Research and the Politics of Ambiguity. Alternatives: Global, Local, Political 40 (3–4): 201–218.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0304375415612270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Fallend, Franz, and Reinhard Heinisch. 2016. Collaboration as Successful Strategy Against Right-Wing Populism? The Case of the Centre-Right Coalition in Austria, 2000–2007. Democratization 23 (2): 324–344.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2015.1060223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Faulkner, Neil. 2017. Creeping Fascism: Brexit, Trump, and the Rise of the Far Right. London: Public Reading Rooms.Google Scholar
  37. Finnemore, Martha, and Kathryn Sikkink. 1998. International Norm Dynamics and Political Change. International Organization 52 (4): 887–917.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Geis, Anna, Frank Nullmeier, and Christopher Daase (eds.). 2012. Der Aufstieg der Legitimitätspolitik: Rechtfertigung und Kritik politisch-ökonomischer Ordnungen. Baden-Baden: Nomos.Google Scholar
  39. George, Alexander L. 1969. The “Operational Code”: A Neglected Approach to the Study of Political Leaders and Decision-Making. International Studies Quarterly 13 (2): 190–222. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Gifford, Chris. 2006. The Rise of Post-imperial Populism: The Case of Right-Wing Euroscepticism in Britain. European Journal of Political Research 45 (5): 851–869.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2006.00638.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Gilardi, Fabrizio. 2013. Transnational Diffusion: Norms, Ideas, and Policies. In Handbook of International Relations, ed. Walter Carlsnaes, Thomas Risse, and Beth A. Simmons, 453–477. London et al.: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Gökarıksel, Banu, and Sara Smith. 2016. “Making America Great Again”?: The Fascist Body Politics of Donald Trump. Political Geography 54: 79–81.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2016.07.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Goldstein, Judith, and Robert O. Keohane. 1993. Ideas and Foreign Policy: An Analytical Framework. In Ideas and Foreign Policy: Beliefs, Institutions, and Political Change, ed. Judith Goldstein and Robert O. Keohane, 3–30. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Görener, Aylin Ş., and Meltem Ş. Ucal. 2011. The Personality and Leadership Style of Recep Tayyip Erdoğan: Implications for Turkish Foreign Policy. Turkish Studies 12 (3): 357–381.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14683849.2011.604216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Grattan, Laura. 2016. Populism’s Power: Radical Grassroots Democracy in America. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Greenstein, Fred I. 2005. Presidents, Their Styles and Their Leadership. Center for Public Leadership Working Paper Series, 5–11, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
  47. Grimm, Robert. 2015. The Rise of the German Eurosceptic Party Alternative für Deutschland, between Ordoliberal Critique and Popular Anxiety. International Political Science Review 36 (3): 264–278.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512115575384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Gronau, Jennifer, Martin Nonhoff, Frank Nullmeier, and Steffen Schneider. 2009. Spiele ohne Brot? Leviathan 37 (1): 117–143.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11578-009-0008-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Hansen, Lene. 2006. Security as Practice: Discourse Analysis and the Bosnian War. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  50. Hawkins, Kirk A. 2009. Is Chávez Populist? Measuring Populist Discourse in Comparative Perspective. Comparative Political Studies 42 (8): 1040–1067.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414009331721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Held, David, and Anthony McGrew. 2007. Globalization/Anti-globalization: Beyond the Great Divide, 2nd ed. Cambridge and Malden, MA: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  52. Hermann, Margaret G., Thomas Preston, Baghat Korany, and Timothy M. Shaw. 2001. Who Leads Matters: The Effects of Powerful Individuals. Special issue, International Studies Review 3: 83–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Herschinger, Eva. 2011. Constructing Global Enemies: Hegemony and Identity in International Discourses on Terrorism and Drug Prohibition. London, UK: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Hill, Christopher. 2016. Foreign Policy in the Twenty-First Century, 2nd ed. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Huber, Robert A., and Christian H. Schimpf. 2017. On the Distinct Effects of Left-Wing and Right-Wing Populism on Democratic Quality. Politics and Governance 5 (4): 20.  https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v5i4.919.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Ikenberry, G. John, Jisi Wang, and Zhu Feng (eds.). 2015. America, China, and the Struggle for World Order. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  57. Inglehart, Ronald F., and Pippa Norris. 2016. Trump, Brexit, and the Rise of Populism: Economic Have-Nots and Cultural Backlash. Faculty Research Working Paper Series. Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  58. Kaarbo, Juliet, and Margaret G. Hermann. 1998. Leadership Styles of Prime Ministers: How Individual Differences Affect the Foreign Policymaking Process. The Leadership Quarterly 9 (3): 243–263.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1048-9843(98)90029-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Kaltwasser, Cristóbal Rovira. 2011. Skizze einer vergleichenden Forschungsagenda zum Populismus. Totalitarismus und Demokratie 8: 251–271.Google Scholar
  60. Kaltwasser, Cristóbal Rovira. 2014. Latin American Populism: Some Conceptual and Normative Lessons. Constellations 21 (4): 494–504.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8675.12125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Keck, Margaret E., and Kathryn Sikkink. 1998. Activists Beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  62. Kenneth White, John. 2016. Donald Trump and the Scourge of Populism. The Forum 14 (3): 265–279.  https://doi.org/10.1515/for-2016-0026.
  63. Kissinger, Henry. 2014. World Order. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  64. Kornblum, John. 2016. The Amerexit. The American Interest 12 (1). https://www.the-american-interest.com/2016/07/25/no-exit-from-europe/.
  65. Laclau, Ernesto. 2005. On Populist Reason. New York: Verso.Google Scholar
  66. Lapham, Lewis H. 2016. Age of Folly: America Abandons Its Democracy. New York: Verso Books.Google Scholar
  67. Larsen, Henrik. 1997. Foreign Policy and Discourse Analysis. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  68. Legro, Jeffrey W. 2000. Whence American Internationalism. International Organization 54 (2): 253–289.  https://doi.org/10.1162/002081800551172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Leibfried, Stephan, Evelyne Huber, Matthew Lange, Jonah H. Levy, Frank Nullmeier, and John D. Stephens (eds.). 2015. The Oxford Handbook of Transformations of the State. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  70. Levy, Jack S. 1994. Learning and Foreign Policy: Sweeping a Conceptual Minefield. International Organization 48 (2): 279–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Madsen, Mikael Rask, and Mikkel Jarle Christensen. 2016. Global Actors: Networks, Elites, and Institutions. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics.  https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Managhan, Tina. 2012. Highways, Heroes, and Secular Martyrs: The Symbolics of Power and Sacrifice. Review of International Studies 38 (1): 97–118.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210511000271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. March, Luke. 2017. Left and Right Populism Compared: The British Case. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations 19 (2): 282–303.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1369148117701753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. March, James G., and Johan P. Olsen. 1998. The Institutional Dynamics of International Political Orders. International Organization 52 (4): 943–969.  https://doi.org/10.1162/002081898550699.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Mattelaer, Alexander. 2016. Revisiting the Principles of NATO Burden-Sharing. Parameters 46 (1): 25–33.Google Scholar
  76. Maull, Hanns W. 2000. Germany and the Use of Force: Still a Civilian Power? Survival 42 (2): 56–80.  https://doi.org/10.1093/survival/42.2.56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. McKean, Benjamin L. 2016. Toward an Inclusive Populism? On the Role of Race and Difference in Laclau’s Politics. Political Theory 44 (6): 797–820.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0090591716647771.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Mearsheimer, John J. 2001. The Tragedy of Great Power Politics. New York and London: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
  79. Moffitt, Benjamin, and Simon Tormey. 2014. Rethinking Populism: Politics, Mediatisation and Political Style. Political Studies 62 (2): 381–397.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.12032.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Mudde, Cas. 2007. Populist Radical Right Parties in Europe. Cambridge: Cambirdge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Mudde, Cas. 2016. On Extremism and Democracy in Europe. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  82. Mudde, Cas, and Cristóbal Rovira Kaltwasser. 2013. Exclusionary vs. Inclusionary Populism: Comparing Contemporary Europe and Latin America. Government and Opposition 48 (2): 147–174.  https://doi.org/10.1017/gov.2012.11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Mudde, Cas, and Cristóbal Rovira Kaltwasser. 2014. Populism and Political Leadership. In The Oxford Handbook of Political Leadership, ed. R.A.W. Rhodes, and Paul ‘t Hart. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  84. Mudde, Cas, and Cristóbal Rovira Kaltwasser. 2017. Populism: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Müller, Jan-Werner. 2016a. Trump, Erdoğan, Farage: The Attractions of Populism for Politicians, the Dangers for Democracy. The Guardian. Online, September 2. https://www.theguardian.com/books/2016/sep/02/trump-erdogan-farage-the-attractions-of-populism-for-politicians-the-dangers-for-democracy.
  86. Müller, Jan-Werner. 2016b. What Is Populism? Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Nabers, Dirk. 2010. Power, Leadership, and Hegemony in International Politics: The Case of East Asia. Review of International Studies 36 (4): 931–949.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Nabers, Dirk. 2015. A Poststructuralist Discourse Theory of Global Politics. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Nabers, Dirk, and Frank A. Stengel. 2017. Trump und der Populismus. Berlin: Heinrich Böll Stiftung. https://www.boell.de/sites/default/files/trump-und-der-populismus-e-paper-2017.pdf.
  90. Neumann, Iver B. 1999. Uses of the Other: “The East” in European Identity Formation. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  91. Nonhoff, Martin, Jennifer Gronau, Frank Nullmeier, and Steffen Schneider. 2009. Zur Politisierung internationaler Institutionen. Der Fall G8. Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen 16 (2): 237–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Norrlof, Carla. 2018. Hegemony and Inequality: Trump and the Liberal Playbook. International Affairs 94 (1): 63–88.  https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Nullmeier, Frank, and Martin Nonhoff. 2010. Der Wandel des Legitimitätsgedankens. In Prekäre Legitimitäten: Rechtfertigung von Herrschaft in der postnationalen Konstellation, ed. Frank Nullmeier, Dominika Beigon, Jennifer Gronau, Martin Nonhoff, Henning Schmidtke, and Steffen Schneider, 16–45. Frankfurt am Main: Campus Verlag.Google Scholar
  94. Oliver, J. Eric, and Wendy M. Rahn. 2016. Rise of the Trumpenvolk: Populism in the 2016 Election. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 667 (1): 189–206.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716216662639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Owen, John M. 2017. Anti-liberalism Pushes Back. Global Policy 8 (S4): 73–84.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Panke, Diana, and Ulrich Petersohn. 2011. Why International Norms Disappear Sometimes. European Journal of International Relations 18 (4): 719–742.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066111407690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Patrick, Stewart M. 2017. Trump and World Order. Foreign Affairs 96 (2): 52–57.Google Scholar
  98. Pierce, Jonathan, and Katherine Hicks. 2017. Advocacy Coalitions in Foreign Policy. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics, ed. William R. Thompson. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  99. Poloni-Staudinger, Lori, and Candice Ortbals. 2014. Gendering Abbottabad: Agency and Hegemonic Masculinity in an Age of Global Terrorism. Gender Issues 31 (1): 34–57.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12147-014-9117-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Priester, Karin. 2012. Rechter und linker Populismus: Annäherung an ein Chamäleon. Frankfurt am Main: Campus.Google Scholar
  101. Rathbun, Brian. 2008. A Rose by Any Other Name: Neoclassical Realism as the Logical and Necessary Extension of Structural Realism. Security Studies 17 (2): 294–321.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09636410802098917.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Rhodes, R.A.W. 2007. Understanding Governance: Ten Years On. Organization Studies 28 (8): 1243–1264.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840607076586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Rose, Gideon. 1998. Neoclassical Realism and Theories of Foreign Policy. World Politics 51 (1): 144–172.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043887100007814.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Rosenau, James N., and Ernst-Otto Czempiel (eds.). 1992. Governance Without Government: Order and Change in World Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  105. Rosert, Elvira. 2012. Fest etablisert und weiterhin lebendig: Normenforschung in den Internaitonalen Beziehungen. Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft 22 (4): 599–623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Roth, Kenneth. 2017. The Dangerous Rise of Populism: Global Attacks on Human Rights Values. In World Report 2017, ed. Human Rights Watch, 1–14. New York: Seven Stories Press.Google Scholar
  107. Schafer, Mark, and Stephen G. Walker. 2006. Democratic Leaders and the Democratic Peace: The Operational Codes of Tony Blair and Bill Clinton. International Studies Quarterly 50 (3): 561–583.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2478.2006.00414.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Schweller, Randall L. 2004. Unanswered Threats: A Neoclassical Realist Theory of Underbalancing. International Security 29 (2): 159–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Seibel, Wolfgang. 2015. Politisierung internationaler Organisationen: Eine theoretische Einordnung am Beispiel der Vereinten Nationen und des Prinzips der Schutzverantwortung. In Internationale Organisationen: Autonomie, Politisierung, interorganisationale Beziehungen und Wandel, ed. da Conceição-Heldt, Eugénia, Martin Koch, and Andrea Liese, 244–270. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Sjoberg, Laura, and J. Ann Tickner. 2013. Feminist Perspectives on International Relations. In Handbook of International Relations, ed. Walter Carlsnaes, Thomas Risse, and Beth A. Simmons, 170–195. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Slaughter, Anne-Marie. 2004. A New World Order. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  112. Sørensen, Georg. 2004. The Transformation of the State: Beyond the Myth of Retreat. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Stavrakakis, Yannis. 2015. Populism in Power: Syriza’s Challenge to Europe. Juncture 21 (4): 273–280.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2050-5876.2015.00817.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. Stavrakakis, Yannis. 2017. Discourse Theory in Populism Research. Journal of Language and Politics.  https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.17025.sta.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. Stavrakakis, Yannis, and Giorgos Katsambekis. 2014. Left-Wing Populism in the European Periphery: The Case of SYRIZA. Journal of Political Ideologies 19 (2): 119–142.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13569317.2014.909266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. Stavrakakis, Yannis, Giorgos Katsambekis, Nikos Nikisianis, Alexandros Kioupkiolis, and Thomas Siomos. 2017. Extreme Right-Wing Populism in Europe: Revisiting a Reified Association. Critical Discourse Studies 14 (4): 1–20.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2017.1309325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. Stetter, Stephan. 2013. Ordnung und Wandel in der Weltpolitik: Konturen einer ›Soziologie der Internationalen Beziehungen‹. In Ordnung und Wandel in der Weltpolitik: Konturen einer Soziologie der Internationalen Beziehungen, ed. Stephan Stetter, 9–56. Nomos: Baden-Baden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. Stokes, Doug. 2018. Trump, American Hegemony and the Future of the Liberal International Order. International Affairs 94 (1): 133–150.  https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iix238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. Taggart, Paul, and Cristóbal Rovira Kaltwasser. 2016. Dealing with Populists in Government: Some Comparative Conclusions. Democratization 23 (2): 345–365.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2015.1076230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. The New York Times. 2016. Transcript: Donald Trump Expounds on His Foreign Policy Views. The New York Times. Online, March 26. http://www.nytimes.com/2016/03/27/us/politics/donald-trump-transcript.html?_r=1.
  121. Verbeek, Bertjan, and Andrej Zaslove. 2017. Populism and Foreign Policy. In The Oxford Handbook of Populism, ed. Cristóbal Rovira Kaltwasser, Paul Taggart, Paulina Ochoa Espejo, and Pierre Ostiguy, 384–406. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  122. Walker, Stephen G., and Mark Schafer. 2010. Operational Code Theory: Beliefs and Foreign Policy Decisions. In The International Studies Encyclopedia, ed. Robert A. Denemark. Oxford: Blackwell.  https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190846626.013.411.Google Scholar
  123. Waltz, Kenneth N. 1996. International Politics Is Not Foreign Policy. Security Studies 6 (1): 54–57.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09636419608429298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  124. Wesslau, Fredrik. 2016. Populist Disruptors Are Dismantling the World Order. Newsweek, April 12. https://www.newsweek.com/populist-disruptors-dismantling-world-order-527603.
  125. Wivel, Anders. 2017. Realism in Foreign Policy Analysis. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics, ed. William R. Thompson. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  126. Wonka, Arndt. 2007. Concept Specification in Political Science Research. In Research Design in Political Science: How to Practice What They Preach? ed. Thomas Gschwend and Frank Schimmelpfennig, 41–61. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  127. Yost, David S. 2000. He NATO Capabilities Gap and the European Union. Survival 42 (4): 97–128.  https://doi.org/10.1093/survival/42.4.97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  128. Zakaria, Fareed. 2016. Populism on the March: Why the West Is in Trouble. Foreign Affairs 95 (6): 9–15.Google Scholar
  129. Zürn, Michael. 2004. Global Governance and Legitimacy Problems. Government and Opposition 39 (2): 60–287.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-7053.2004.00123.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  130. Zürn, Michael. 2013. Globalization and Governance. In Handbook of International Relations, ed. Walter Carlsnaes, Thomas Risse, and Beth A. Simmons, 401–425. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  131. Zürn, Michael. 2014. The Politicization of World Politics and Its Effects: Eight Propositions. European Political Science Review 6 (01): 47–71.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755773912000276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  132. Zürn, Michael. 2016. Opening Up Europe: Next Steps in Politicisation Research. West European Politics 39 (1): 164–182.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2015.1081513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  133. Zürn, Michael, Martin Binder, and Matthias Ecker-Ehrhardt. 2012. International Authority and Its Politicization. International Theory 4 (1): 69–106.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S1752971912000012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Frank A. Stengel
    • 1
    Email author
  • David B. MacDonald
    • 2
  • Dirk Nabers
    • 1
  1. 1.Kiel UniversityKielGermany
  2. 2.University of GuelphGuelphCanada

Personalised recommendations