Advertisement

‘Restricted’ and ‘General’ Complexity Perspectives on Social Bilingualisation and Language Shift Processes

  • Albert Bastardas-Boada
Chapter

Abstract

Historical processes exert an influence on the current state and evolution of situations of language contact, brought to bear from different domains: the economic and the political, the ideological and group identities, geo-demographics, and the habits of inter-group use, among others. Clearly, this kind of phenomenon requires study from a complexical and holistic perspective in order to accommodate the variety of factors that belong to different levels and that interrelate with one another in the evolving dynamic of human languaging. The need in my view is for the restricted and general complexity approaches to come to a meeting of the minds, and take steps toward a mutual integration based on the acceptance of the shortcomings of each approach, achieving progress through a non-contradictory complementarity of perspectives. It must be conceded that the practical and methodological applications of basic complexical ideas need to be developed much farther in order to apply them to specific research. At the same time, the limits of complex adaptive systems as computational strategies must be accepted in the pursuit of a better understanding of the dynamic and evolutionary processes typical of human beings. New tools for the conception, apprehension and treatment of the data will need to be devised to complement existing ones and to enable us to make headway toward practices that better fit complexical perspectives. It seems obvious that human complexics must be seen as multi-methodological, insofar as necessary combining quantitative-computation methodologies and more qualitative methodologies aimed at understanding the historical mental and emotional world of people.

References

  1. Alarcón, A., & Garzón, L. (2011). Language, migration and social mobility in Catalonia. Leiden: Koninklijke Brill NV.  https://doi.org/10.1163/ej.9789004211230.i-160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allen, T. F. H., & Hoekstra, T. W. (2014). Toward a unified ecology. New York: Columbia University Press.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-5347(93)90065-w.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aracil, Ll. V. (1982). Papers de sociolingüística. Barcelona: La Magrana.Google Scholar
  4. Aracil, Ll. V. (1983). Dir la realitat. Barcelona: Edicions Països Catalans.  https://doi.org/10.1017/s0047404500012148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Axelrod, R. (1997). Complexity of cooperation. Princeton: Princeton University Press.  https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1099-0526(199801/02)3:3%3c46:aid-cplx6%3e3.0.co;2-k.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Azurmendi, M. J., & Martínez de Luna, I. (2011). Success-failure continuum of Euskara in the Basque country. In J. A. Fishman & O. García (Eds.), Handbook of language and ethnic identity (pp. 323–335). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Bastardas-Boada, A. (1995). Language management and language behavior change: Policies and social persistence. Catalan Review, 9(2), 15–38.Google Scholar
  8. Bastardas-Boada, A. (1996). Ecologia de les llengües. Medi, contacte i dinàmica sociolingüística. Barcelona: Proa. (English version: From language shift to language revitalization and sustainability: A complexity approach to linguistic ecology. Barcelona: Publicacions de la Universitat de Barcelona, in press).Google Scholar
  9. Bastardas-Boada, A. (1999). Lingüística general y teorías de la complejidad ecológica: algunas ideas desde una transdisciplinariedad sugerente. In J. Fernández González (Ed.), Lingüística para el siglo XXI (pp. 287–294). Salamanca: Publ. Universidad de Salamanca.Google Scholar
  10. Bastardas-Boada, A. (2013a). General linguistics and communication sciences: Sociocomplexity as an integrative perspective. In M. À. Massip-Bonet & A. Bastardas-Boada (Eds.), Complexity perspectives on language, communication and society (pp. 151–173). Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bastardas-Boada, A. (2013b). Language policy and planning as an interdisciplinary field: Towards a complexity approach. Current Issues in Language Planning, 14(3–4), 363–381.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14664208.2013.829276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bastardas-Boada, A. (2014). Some physics, ecology and complexity ideas for a complex-figurational sociolinguistics. History of the Human Sciences, 27(3), 55–75.  https://doi.org/10.1177/2F0952695114534425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bastardas-Boada, A. (2016a). Complexity in language contact: A socio-cognitive framework. In S. S. Mufwene, C. Coupé, & F. Pellegrino (Eds.), Complexity in language: Developmental and evolutionary perspectives (pp. 218–244). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.  https://doi.org/10.1017/9781107294264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bastardas-Boada, A. (2016b). Famílies lingüísticament mixtes a Catalunya: competències, usos i autoorganització evolutiva. Treballs de Sociolingüística Catalana (English version in press: Mixed-language Families in Catalonia: Competences, Uses and Evolving Self-organisation. In A. Bastardas-Boada, E. Boix-Fuster, & R. M. Torrens Guerrini (Eds.), Family Multilingualism in Medium-Sized Linguistic Communities. Bern: Peter Lang.), 26, 285–308.  https://doi.org/10.2436/20.2504.01.121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bastardas-Boada, A. (2016c). Complexics as a meta-transdisciplinary field. Congrès Mondial pour la pensée complexe. Les défis d’un monde globalisé. (Paris, 8–9 décembre). UNESCO. Retrieved from https://www.reseau-canope.fr/fileadmin/user_upload/Projets/pensee_complexe/bastardas_boada_complexics_meta_transdisciplinary_field.pdf.
  16. Bateson, G. (1972). Steps to an ecology of mind. New York: Ballantine Books.  https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226924601.001.0001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Beltran, F. S., Herrando, S., Ferreres, D., Adell, M. A., Estrader, V., & Ruiz-Soler, M. (2009). Forecasting a language shift based on cellular automata. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 12(3), 1–8. Retrieved from http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/12/3/5.html.
  18. Beltran, F. S., Herrando, S., Estrader, V., Ferreres, D., Adell, M. A., & Ruiz-Soler, M. (2011). A language shift simulation based on cellular automata. In E. G. Blanchard & D. Allard (Eds.), Handbook of research on culturally-aware information technology: Perspectives and models (pp. 136–151). Hershey, New York: Information Science Reference.  https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-61520-883-8.ch007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Bohm, D. (1980). Wholeness and the implicate order. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.  https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203995150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Boix-Fuster, E. (2009). Català o castellà amb els fills? La transmissió de la llengua en famílies bilingües a Barcelona. Barcelona: Rourich.Google Scholar
  21. Boix-Fuster, E., & Torrens, R. M. (2012). Les llengües al sofà. El plurilingüisme familiar als països de llengua catalana. Lleida: Pagès editors.Google Scholar
  22. Boix-Fuster, E., & Farràs, J. (2012). Is Catalan a medium-sized language community too? In F. X. Vila (Ed.), Survival and development of language communities prospects and challenges (pp. 157–178). Clevendon: Multilingual Matters.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Byrne, D., & Callaghan, G. (2014). Complexity theory and the social sciences. The state of the art. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  25. Capra, F. (2002). The hidden connections. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  26. Castellani, B., & Hafferty, F. W. (2009). Sociology and complexity science. Berlin: Springer.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-88462-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Castelló Llobet, X. (2010). Collective phenomena in social dynamics: Consensus problems, ordering dynamics and language competition (Doctoral dissertation). University of the Balearic Islands. Palma de Mallorca. Retrieved from https://ifisc.uib-csic.es/en/publications/collective-phenomena-in-social-dynamics-consensus/.
  28. Castelló, X., Vazquez, F., Eguíluz, V. M., Loureiro-Porto, L., San Miguel, M., Chapel, L., et al. (2011). Viability and resilience in the dynamics of language competition. In G. Deffuant & N. Gilbert (Eds.), Viability and resilience of complex systems (pp. 39–74). Heidelberg: Springer.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-20423-4_3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Castelló, X., Loureiro-Porto, L., & San Miguel, M. (2013). Agent-based models of language competition. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 221, 21–51.  https://doi.org/10.1515/ijsl-2013-0022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Coller, X. (2006). Collective identities and failed nationalism. The case of Valencia in Spain. Pôle Sud, 25, 107–136.  https://doi.org/10.3406/pole.2006.1357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Conill, J. J. (2003). The situation of Valencian as reported in non-institutional sociolinguistic research (1998–2002). Noves SL. Revista de Sociolingüística (pp. 1–9). Retrieved from http://www.gencat.cat/llengua/noves/noves/hm03primavera/catalana/a_conill.pdf.
  32. Corbeil, J. C. (1983). Élements d’une theorie de la regulation linguistique. In É. Bedard, & J. Maurais (Eds.), La norme linguistique (pp. 281–303). Québec & Paris: Conseil de la Langue Française. Retrieved from http://www.cslf.gouv.qc.ca/bibliotheque-virtuelle/publication-html/?tx_iggcpplus_pi4%5bfile%5d=publications/pubf101/f101p3.html#x.
  33. Dunning, E., & Hugues, J. (2013). Norbert Elias and modern sociology. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  34. Elias, N. (1982). Sociología fundamental. [Spanish translation of Was ist Soziologie? Munich, Juventa Verlag, 1970]. Barcelona: Gedisa.Google Scholar
  35. Elias, N. (2000). The civilizing process. [English translation of Über den Prozess der Zivilisation. Soziogenetische und psychogenetische Untersuchungen. Basel, Haus zum Falken, 1939]. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  36. Fishman, J. A. (1991). Reversing language shift. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  37. Gal, S. (1979). Language shift: Social determinants of linguistic change in bilingual Austria. San Francisco: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  38. Gell-Mann, M. (1994). The Quark and the Jaguar: Adventures in the Simple and the Complex. New York: Henry Holt and Company.Google Scholar
  39. Hamers, J. F., & Blanc, M. H. A. (2000). Bilinguality and bilingualism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Haugen, E. (1972). The ecology of language. In A. S. Dil (Ed.), The ecology of language (pp. 325–339). Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Holland, J. H. (1996). Hidden order: How adaptation builds complexity. New York: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  42. Lieberson, S. (1970). Language and ethnic relations in Canada. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  43. Lorenzo Suárez, A. M. (2003). Studies relating to the sociolinguistic situation of the Galician language (1990–2002). Noves SL. Revista de Sociolingüística, Primavera, 2003, 1–9.Google Scholar
  44. Loureiro-Porto, L., & San Miguel, M. (2017). Language choice in a multilingual society: A view from complexity science. In S. S. Mufwene, C. Coupé, & F. Pellegrino (Eds.), Complexity in language. Developmental and evolutionary perspectives (pp. 187–217). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Mackey, W. F. (1979). Toward an ecology of language contact. In W. F. Mackey & J. Ornstein (Eds.), Sociolinguistic studies in language contact (pp. 453–460). The Hague: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Mackey, W. F. (1980). The ecology of language shift. In P. H. Nelde (Ed.), Sprachkontakt und Sprachkonflikt (pp. 35–41). Wiesbaden: Franz Steiner Verlag.Google Scholar
  47. Mackey, W. F. (1994). La ecología de las sociedades plurilingües. In A. Bastardas-Boada & E. Boix-Fuster (Eds.), ¿Un estado, una lengua? La organización política de la diversidad lingüística (pp. 25–54). Barcelona: Octaedro.Google Scholar
  48. Malaina, Á. (2012). Le paradigme de la complexité et la sociologie. Possibilité et limites d’une sociologie complexe. Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
  49. Margalef, R. (1991). Teoría de los sistemas ecológicos. Barcelona: Publicacions de la Universitat de Barcelona.Google Scholar
  50. Maturana, H. (2002). Autopoiesis, structural coupling and cognition. Cybernetics & Human Knowing, 9(3–4), 5–34.Google Scholar
  51. Maturana, H., & Varela, F. J. (2004). De máquinas y seres vivos. Autopoiesis: La organización de lo vivo. Buenos Aires: Lumen.Google Scholar
  52. Montoya Abat, B. & Mas i Miralles, A. (2012). Language teaching and family linguistic transmission: Two correlative factors in the Valencian Region (Catalan vs. Spanish)? Sociolinguistic Studies, 6(1), 45–63.  https://doi.org/10.1558/sols.v6i1.45.
  53. Morin, E. (1977). La nature de la nature. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
  54. Morin, E. (1994). La complexité humaine. Paris: Flammarion.Google Scholar
  55. Morin, E. (2005). Restricted complexity, general complexity. Colloquium Intelligence de la complexité: épistémologie et pragmatique. (Translated from French by Carlos Gershenson in 17 June, 2014).  https://doi.org/10.1142/9789812707420_0002.
  56. Nisbet, R. (1977). The social bond. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  57. Prigogine, I., & Stengers, I. (1979). La nouvelle alliance. Métamorphose de la science. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
  58. Prigogine, I., & Stengers, I. (1992). Entre le temps et l’éternité. Paris: Flammarion.Google Scholar
  59. Querol, E. (1990). El procés de substitució lingüística: la comarca dels Ports com a exemple. Miscel·lània, 89, 87–196.Google Scholar
  60. Roggero, P. (2013). Para una sociología según El método. In E. Ruiz Ballesteros & J. L. Solana Ruiz (Eds.), Complejidad y ciencias sociales (pp. 103–123). Sevilla: Universidad Internacional de Andalucía.Google Scholar
  61. Ruiz Ballesteros, E. (2013). Hacia la operativización de la complejidad en ciencias sociales. In E. Ruiz Ballesteros & J. L. Solana Ruiz (Eds.), Complejidad y ciencias sociales (pp. 137–172). Sevilla: Universidad Internacional de Andalucía.Google Scholar
  62. Ryan, E. B. (1979). Why do low-prestige language varieties persist? In H. Giles, & R. N. St. Clair (Eds.), Language and social psychology (pp. 145–157). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  63. San Miguel, M., Johnson, J. H., Kertesz, J., Kaski, K., Díaz-Guilera, A., MacKay, R. S., et al. (2012). Challenges in complex systems science. The European Physical Journal. Special Topics, 214, 245–271.  https://doi.org/10.1140/epjst/e2012-01694-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Siguan, M. (1993). Multilingual Spain. Amsterdam: Swets-Zeitlinger.Google Scholar
  65. Solana Ruiz, J. L. (2013). El concepto de complejidad y su constelación semántica. In E. Ruiz Ballesteros & J. L. Solana Ruiz (Eds.), Complejidad y ciencias sociales (pp. 19–101). Sevilla: Universidad Internacional de Andalucía.Google Scholar
  66. Solé, R. V., & Bascompte, J. (2006). Self-organization in complex systems. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  67. Strubell, M. & Boix‐Fuster, E. (Eds.) (2011). Democratic Policies for Language Revitalisation: The Case of Catalan. Basingstoke, U.K.: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  68. Terborg, R., & García-Landa, L. (2011). Muerte y vitalidad de lenguas indígenas y las presiones sobre sus hablantes. México: UNAM.Google Scholar
  69. Terborg, R., & García-Landa, L. (2013). The ecology of pressures: Towards a tool to analyze the complex process of language shift and maintenance. In À. Massip-Bonet & A. Bastardas-Boada (Eds.), Complexity perspectives on language, communication and society understanding complex Systems (pp. 219–239). Berlin: Springer.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32817-6_14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Turell, M. T. (2001). Multilingualism in Spain. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.  https://doi.org/10.1017/s0047404502270293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Vila i Moreno, F. X. (2011). Language in education policies. In M. Strubell i Trueta, & E. Boix-Fuster (Eds.), Democratic policies for language revitalisation. The case of Catalan (pp. 119–149). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  72. Vila i Moreno, F. X. (2012). Survival and development of language communities. Prospects and challenges. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.  https://doi.org/10.1075/lplp.38.1.08nue.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Wallerstein, I. (1996). Ouvrir les sciences sociales. Rapport de la Commission Gulbenkian. Paris: Descartes & Cie.Google Scholar
  74. Weinreich, U. (1968). Languages in contact. The Hague: Mouton Publications.Google Scholar
  75. Wiener, N. (1948). Cybernetics or control and communication in the animal and the machine. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  76. Williams, C. (2005). The case of Welsh/Cymraeg in Wales. In D. Ó. Néill (Ed.), Rebuilding the Celtic languages: Reversing language shift in the Celtic countries (pp. 35–115). Talybont: Y Lolfa Cyf.Google Scholar
  77. Wolfram, S. (1983). Statistical mechanics of cellular automata. Reviews of Modern Physics, 55(3), 601–644.  https://doi.org/10.1103/revmodphys.55.601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Wolfram, S. (2002). A new kind of science. Champaign: Wolfram Media.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Catalan Philology and General Linguistics, Sociocomplexity—Complexity, Communication and Sociolinguistics Group, CUSC—Research Centre for Sociolinguistics and Communication, UBICS—Universitat de Barcelona Institute of Complex SystemsUniversitat de BarcelonaBarcelonaSpain

Personalised recommendations