Advertisement

Introduction

  • Àngels Massip-Bonet
  • Gemma Bel-Enguix
  • Albert Bastardas-Boada
Chapter

Abstract

Based on the acknowledgment that many phenomena in human life are complex, there have been attempts to re-examine the conception of reality. Interdisciplines such as complex thinking, sciences of complexity or complex perspectives try to provide the “old” concepts with a new meaning. The complexity researches imply the restudy of reality, and they have cybernetics as precedent and partly as foundation: a transdisciplinary focus to explore the structures, restrictions and possibilities of regulatory systems. It intends to provide concepts, schemata and possibilities of thought and representation capable of expressing the interweaving and the multidimensional and systematic interdependence of the many phenomena of reality. Linguistics is one of the fields of knowledge that is making great progress under the new paradigm of complexity. The amount of contributions from physics and other scientific disciplines to linguistics is large, under which natural language has been addressed with theoretical and practical methods, both quantitative and qualitative. However, the conceptual resources and tools that are available nowadays are not completely suitable to perform all the tasks. Due to this, it is necessary to keep developing new theoretical and methodological tools that help understanding the dynamic interrelations of linguistic and sociocultural events. Simultaneously, the lines of inter and transdisciplinary research that transcend the communicative and linguistic phenomenon, and that connect them and interrelate them with life and the world must be strengthened.

References

  1. Allen, T. F. H., & Hoekstra, T. W. (1992). Toward a unified ecology. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Aracil, L. V. (1982). Papers de sociolingüística. Barcelona: La Magrana.Google Scholar
  3. Aracil, L. V. (1983). Dir la realitat. Edicions Països Catalans.Google Scholar
  4. Ashby, W. R. (1956). An introduction to cybernetics. London: Chapman & Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bailey, K. (1994). Sociology and the new systems theory: Toward a theoretical synthesis. New York: New York State University.Google Scholar
  6. Bailey, K. D. (1994). Typologies and taxonomies: An introduction to classification techniques. Newbury Park: Sage cop.Google Scholar
  7. Barabási, A.-L., & Albert, R. (1999). Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science, 286, 509–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bastardas-Boada, A. (1996). Ecologia de les llengües. Medi, contacte i dinàmica sociolingüística [From language shift to language revitalization and sustainability: A complexity approach to linguistic ecology]. Barcelona: Proa; Barcelona: Publicacions de la Universitat de Barcelona (in press).Google Scholar
  9. Bastardas-Boada, A. (2004). Sociolingüística versus política y planificación lingüísticas: distinciones entre los campos y nociones integradoras. Revista de llengua i dret, 41, 175–194.Google Scholar
  10. Bastardas-Boada, A. (2013a). Complexitat i fenomen (socio)lingüístic. LSC—Llengua Societat i Comunicació, 11, 5–13.Google Scholar
  11. Bastardas-Boada, A. (2013b). Sociolinguistics: Towards a complex ecological view. In A. Massip-Bonet & A. Bastardas-Boada (Eds.), Complexity perspectives on language, communication and society (pp. 15–34). Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bastardas-Boada, A. (2013c). General linguistics and communication sciences: Sociocomplexity as an integrative perspective. In A. Massip-Bonet & A. Bastardas-Boada (Eds.), Complexity perspectives on language, communication and society (pp. 151–173). Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bastardas-Boada, A. (2014). Towards a complex-figurational socio-linguistics: Some contributions from physics, ecology and the sciences of complexity. History of the Human Sciences, 27(3), 55–75.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0952695114534425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bastardas-Boada, A. (2016). Complexics as a Meta-Transdisciplinary Field. Congrès Mondial pour lapensée complexe. Les défis d’un monde globalisé. (Paris, 8-9 décembre. UNESCO). Available online at https://www.reseaucanope.fr/fileadmin/user_upload/Projets/pensee_complexe/bastardas_boada_complexics_meta_transdisciplinary_field.pdf
  15. Bastardas-Boada, A. (2017). Complexity in language contact: A socio-cognitive framework. In S. Mufwene, et al. (Eds.), Complexity in language: Developmental and evolutionary Perspectives (pp. 218–243). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Bateson, G. (1972). Steps to an ecology of mind. New York: Ballantine Books.Google Scholar
  17. Bertalanffy, L. Von. (1969). General system theory. New York: George Braziller Inc.Google Scholar
  18. Bohm, D. (1987). La totalidad y el orden implicado. [Spanish translation of Wholeness and the Implicate Order. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1980]. Barcelona, Kairós.Google Scholar
  19. Buckley, W. (1967). Sociology and modern systems theory. Englewood: Prentice-Hall, NJ.Google Scholar
  20. Capra, F. (1982). El punto crucial. Barcelona, Integral ed. [Spanish translation of The Turning Point. New York, Simon & Schuster, 1982)].Google Scholar
  21. Capra, F. (2002). The hidden connections. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  22. Elias, N. (1982). Sociología fundamental. Barcelona, Gedisa [Spanish translation of Was ist Soziologie? Munich, Juventa Verlag, 1970].Google Scholar
  23. Elias, N. (2000). The Civilizing Process. Oxford, Blackwell. [English translation of Über den Prozess der Zivilisation. Soziogenetische und psychogenetische Untersuchungen. Basel, Haus zum Falken, 1939].Google Scholar
  24. Ellis, N. C., & Larsen-Freeman, D. (Eds.). (2009). Language as a complex adaptative system. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
  25. Gell-Mann, M. (1996). El Quark y el jaguar. Aventuras en lo simple y lo complejo [The Quark and the Jaguar: Adventures in the Simple and the Complex]. Barcelona, Tusquets.Google Scholar
  26. Junyent, C. (1992). Vida i mort de les llengües. Barcelona: Empúries.Google Scholar
  27. Margalef, R. (1991). Teoría de los sistemas ecológicos. Barcelona: Publications of the University of Barcelona.Google Scholar
  28. Massip-Bonet, A. (2013a). El llenguatge: una visió des de la teoria de la complexitat, LSC—Llengua, societat i comunicació 11, 20–24 (Monograph on ‘Language and Complexity’).Google Scholar
  29. Massip-Bonet, A. (2013b). Language as a complex adaptive system: Towards an integrative linguistics. In Massip-Bonet & Bastardas-Boada.Google Scholar
  30. Massip-Bonet, A., & Bastardas-Boada, A. (Eds.). (2013). Complexity perspectives on language, communication and society. Springer: Heidelberg.Google Scholar
  31. Maturana, H., & Varela, F. J. (1999). El árbol del conocimiento. Las bases biológicas del conocimiento humano. Madrid: Editorial Debate.Google Scholar
  32. Maturana, H., & Varela, F. J. (2004). De máquinas y seres vivos. Autopoiesis: la organización de lo vivo. Buenos Aires: Lumen.Google Scholar
  33. Mead, M. (1968). Cybernetics of cybernetics. In H. von Foerster, J. White, L. Peterson, & J. Russell (Eds.), Purposive systems. New York: Spartan Books.Google Scholar
  34. Morin, E. (1973). Le paradigme perdu: la nature humaine. Paris, Éditions du Seuil. [Spanish translation of El paradigma perdido. Ensayo de bioantropología. Barcelona, Kairós, 1974].Google Scholar
  35. Morin, E. (1992). Introduction à la pensée complexe. Paris, ESF. [Spanish translation of Introducción al pensamiento complejo. Barcelona, Gedisa, 1994].Google Scholar
  36. Morin, E. (1994). La complexité humaine. Paris: Flammarion.Google Scholar
  37. Morin, E. (2005). Complexité restreinte, complexité générale, in: Colloque “Intelligence de la complexité: épistémologie et pragmatique”, Cerisy-La-Salle, 26 June 2005. Available online at http://www.intelligence-complexite.org/fileadmin/docs/1003morin.pdf.
  38. Morin, E. (2007). Complexité restreinte, complexité générale. In J. L. Le Moigne & E. Morin (Eds.), Intelligence de la complexité. Épistémologie et pragmatique (pp. 28–50). La Tour d’Aigues, Éditions de l’Aube.Google Scholar
  39. Morin, E. (2008). La méthode. Paris: Éditions du Seuil.Google Scholar
  40. Morin, E., & Le Moigne, J. L. (1999). L’intelligence de la complexité. Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
  41. Mufwene, S. (2001). The ecology of language evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Mufwene, S. (2013). The emergence of complexity in language. In A. Massip-Bonet & A. Bastardas-Boada (Eds.), Complexity perspectives on language, communication and society (pp. 197–218). Heidelberg: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Mufwene, S. S., Coupé, C., & Pellegrino, F. (2017). Complexity in Language. Developmental and Evolutionary Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge Univerity Press.Google Scholar
  44. Munné, F. (1995). Las teorías de la complejidad y sus implicaciones en las ciencias del comportamiento. Revista Interamericana de Psicología, 29(1), 1–12.Google Scholar
  45. Munné, F. (2013). The fuzzy complexity of language. In A. Massip-Bonet & A. Bastardas-Boada (Eds.), Complexity perspectives on language, communication and society (pp. 175–196). Heidelberg: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Parra Luna, F. (1992). Elementos para una teoria formal del sistema social: una orientación crítica. Madrid: Editorial Complutense.Google Scholar
  47. Pask, G. (1992). Introduction different kinds of cybernetics. In: van de Vijver G. (Ed.), New perspectives on cybernetics (Vol. 220). Synthese Library (Studies in Epistemology, Logic, Methodology, and Philosophy of Science). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Prigogine, I., & Stengers, I. (1979). La nouvelle alliance. Métamorphose de la science. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
  49. Prigogine, I., & Stengers, I. (1992). Entre le temps et l’éternité. Paris: Flammarion.Google Scholar
  50. Roggero, P. (2013). Para una sociología según El método. In E. Ruiz Ballesteros & J. L. Solana Ruiz (Eds.), Complejidad y ciencias sociales (pp. 103–123). Seville: International University of Andalusia.Google Scholar
  51. Ruiz Ballesteros, E. (2013). Hacia la operativización de la complejidad en ciencias sociales. In Esteban Ruiz Ballesteros, José Luis & Solana Ruiz (Eds.), Complejidad y ciencias sociales (pp. 137–172). Seville: International University of Andalusia.Google Scholar
  52. San Miguel, M., Johnson, J. H., Kertesz, J., Kaski, K., Díaz-Guilera, A., MacKay, R. S., et al. (2012). Challenges in complex systems science. The European Physical Journal Special Topics, 214, 245–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Serrano, S. (1983). La lingüística. Su historia y su desarrollo. Barcelona: Montesinos ed.Google Scholar
  54. Serrano, S. (2001). La semiótica. Una introducción a la teoría de los signos. Barcelona: Montesinos ed.Google Scholar
  55. Simon, H. A. (1990). Invariants of Human Behavior. Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Solé, R. (2009). Redes complejas. Del genoma a Internet. Barcelona: Tusquets.Google Scholar
  57. Steels, L. (2000). Language as a complex adaptive system. In M. Schoenauer, et al. (Eds.), Lecture notes in computer science. Parallel problem solving from nature—PPSN-VI. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  58. Steels, L., & Belpaeme, T. (2005). Coordinating perceptually grounded categories through language: A case study for colour. Behavioural and Brain Science, 28(4), 469–489.Google Scholar
  59. Terborg, R., & García-Landa, L. (2013). The ecology of pressures: Towards a tool to analyze the complex process of language shift and maintenance. In A. Massip-Bonet & A. Bastardas-Boada (Eds.), Complexity perspectives on language, communication and society (pp. 219–239). Heidelberg: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. The ‘Five Graces’ Group: Beckner, C., Blythe, R., Bybee, J., Christiansen, M.H., Croft, W., Ellis, N.C., Holland, J., Ke, J., Larsen-Freeman, D., Schoenemann, T. (2009). Language is a complex adaptive system: Position paper, Language Learning 59(Supplementary 1), 1–26.Google Scholar
  61. Vilarroya, O. (2002). La disolución de la mente. Barcelona: Tusquets editores.Google Scholar
  62. Wagensberg, J. (1985). Ideas sobre la complejidad del mundo. Barcelona: Tusquets editores.Google Scholar
  63. Wiener, N. (1948). Cybernetics or control and communication in the animal and the machine. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  64. Wiener, N. (1954). The human use of human beings: Cybernetics and society. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Àngels Massip-Bonet
    • 1
  • Gemma Bel-Enguix
    • 2
  • Albert Bastardas-Boada
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Catalan Philology and General Linguistics, Projecte Scripta (FFI2016-80482P), Sociocomplexity—Complexity, Communication and Sociolinguistics Group, CUSC—Research Centre for Sociolinguistics and CommunicationUBICS—Universitat de Barcelona Institute of Complex Systems, Universitat de BarcelonaBarcelonaSpain
  2. 2.Grupo de Ingeniería Lingüística—Instituto IngenieríaUniversidad Nacional Autonoma de MéxicoCiudad de MéxicoMexico
  3. 3.Department of Catalan Philology and General Linguistics, Sociocomplexity—Complexity, Communication and Sociolinguistics Group, CUSC—Research Centre for Sociolinguistics and Communication, UBICS—Universitat de Barcelona Institute of Complex SystemsUniversitat de BarcelonaBarcelonaSpain

Personalised recommendations