Advertisement

Scalp and Special Electrodes

  • Oriano MecarelliEmail author
  • Ferruccio Panzica
Chapter

Abstract

In this chapter, the physical characteristics and the functions of the electrodes are reported. In the first part, the differences between the various types of electrodes, the biochemical mechanisms of electrical conduction and the electrode chloridation methods are described. The second part is dedicated to the description of standard EEG electrodes (intrinsic properties, positioning, caps, adhesive pastes). Finally, a description of characteristics and indications of special electrodes is also reported.

Keywords

Scalp electrodes Electrode chloridation Dry electrodes Special electrodes Infection control 

References

  1. 1.
    Neuman MR. Biopotential electrodes. In: Webster JG, editor. Medical instrumentation: application and design. 4th ed. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons Inc.; 2010. p. 189–240.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Rowe BC. Bioelectricity and its measurement. In: Kutz M, editor. Standard handbook of biomedical engineering and design. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2003. p. 1–50.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Falco C, Sebastiano F, Cacciola L, et al. Scalp electrode placement by EC2 adhesive paste in long-term video-EEG monitoring. Clin Neurophysiol. 2005;116:1771–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dash D, Dash C, Primrose S, et al. Update on minimal standards for electroencephalography in Canada: a review by the Canadian Society of Clinical Neurophysiologists. Can J Neurol Sci. 2017;44:631–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Epstein CM, et al. Guidelines Review Committee. American Clinical Neurophysiology Society. Guideline 1: minimum technical requirements for performing clinical electroencephalography. J Clin Neurophysiol. 2006;23:86–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sinha SR, Sullivan S, Sabau D, et al. American Clinical Neurophysiology Society Guideline 1: minimum technical requirements for performing clinical electroencephalography. J Clin Neurophysiol. 2016;33:303–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Searle A, Kirkup L. A direct comparison of wet, dry and insulating bioelectric recording electrodes. Physiol Meas. 2000;21:271–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Metting van Rijn AC, Peper A, Grimbergen CA. High-quality recording of bioelectric events. Part 2. Low-noise, low-power multichannel amplifier design. Med Biol Eng Comput. 1991;29:433–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lin CT, Liao LD, Liu YH, Wang IJ, Lin BS, Chang JY. Novel dry polymer foam electrodes for long-term EEG measurement. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2011;58:1200–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Grozea C, Voinescu CD, Fazli S. Bristle-sensors-low-cost flexible passive dry EEG electrodes for neurofeedback and BCI applications. J Neural Eng. 2011;8:1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lee SM, Kim JH, Byeon HJ, Choi YY, Park KS, Lee SH. A capacitive biocompatible and adhesive electrode for long-term and cap-free monitoring of EEG signals. J Neural Eng. 2013;10:036006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Chen YH, Op de Beeck M, Vanderheyden L, Mihajlovic V, Grundlehner B, Van Hoof C. Comb-shaped polymer-based dry electrodes for EEG/ECG measurements with high user comfort. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2013;2013:551–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Fiedler P, Pedrosa P, Griebel S, Fonseca C, Vaz F, Supriyanto E, Zanow F, Haueisen J. Novel multipin electrode cap system for dry electroencephalography. Brain Topogr. 2015;28:647–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Metting van Rijn AC, Peper A, Grimbergen CA. High-quality recording of bioelectric events. Part 1. Interference reduction, theory and practice. Med Biol Eng Comput. 1990;28:389–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Xu J, Mitra S, Van Hoof C, Yazicioglu RF, Makinwa KAA. Active electrodes for wearable EEG acquisition: review and electronics design methodology. IEEE Rev Biomed Eng. 2017;10:187–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Jones D. Recording of the basal electroencephalogram with sphenoidal electrodes. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1951;3:100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    American EEG Society. Report of the committee on infectious diseases. J Clin Neurophysiol. 1994;11:128–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Scott NK. Infection prevention: 2013 review sand update for neurodiagnostic technologists. Neurodiagn J. 2013;53:271–88.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Human NeurosciencesSapienza University of RomeRomeItaly
  2. 2.Clinical and Biomedical Engineering Unit, Department of NeurophysiologyFondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico “C. Besta”MilanItaly

Personalised recommendations