Belonging and Serving

  • Andrew VillageEmail author


This chapter examines perceptions of the quality of church life and the extent to which lay participants in the surveys were involved in their churches and in their communities. Churches are important institutions for encouraging people to socialize and serve those around them, and this has been a key emphasis for the Church of England over the last decade or more. Church Times readers had a strong sense of belonging to their churches, and this did not change between surveys. Church was more likely to be an important part of the social life of older people, though older people were less likely to feel they could influence decisions, which may have been related to their less active participation in church groups. Voluntary service beyond the church improved significantly between the surveys, perhaps reflecting the Church’s emphasis on serving the common good in this period.


  1. Archbishops’ Council. (2004). Mission-shaped church: Church planting and Fresh Expressions of Church in a changing context. London: Church of England.Google Scholar
  2. Church Army’s Research Unit. (2013). An analysis of Fresh Expressions of Church and church plants begun in the period 1992–2012. Retrieved November 20, 2014, from
  3. Church Growth Research Programme. (2013). From anecdote to evidence. London: The Church Commissioners for England.Google Scholar
  4. Church of England. (2017). Going to church and praying. Retrieved December 21, 2017, from
  5. Clark, A. K. (2015). Rethinking the decline in social capital. American Politics Research, 43(4), 569–601.
  6. Davie, G. (1994). Religion in Britain since 1945: Believing without belonging. Oxford and Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  7. Dekker, P., & Van Den Broek, A. (2005). Involvement in voluntary associations in North America and Western Europe: Trends and correlates 1981–2000. Journal of Civil Society, 1(1), 45–59. Scholar
  8. Egerton, M. (2002). Higher education and civic engagement. The British Journal of Sociology, 53(4), 603–620. Scholar
  9. Francis, L. J., & Lankshear, D. W. (2015). Introducing the congregational bonding social capital scale: A study among Anglican churchgoers in south London. Journal of Beliefs & Values, 36(2), 224–230. Scholar
  10. Francis, L. J., & Richter, P. J. (2007). Gone for good? Church-leaving and returning in the twenty-first century. Peterborough: Epworth.Google Scholar
  11. Gumbel, N. (1994). Telling others: The Alpha initiative. Eastbourne: Kingsway Publications.Google Scholar
  12. Heard, J. (2012). Inside Alpha: Explorations in evangelism. Eugene, OR: Wipf and Stock.Google Scholar
  13. House of Bishops and Archbishops’ Council. (2011). Challenges for the new quinquennium (GS1815). London: Church of England.Google Scholar
  14. Howes, G. (1998). Urban problems and policy: An Anglican case study. Social Compass, 45(1), 43–55. Scholar
  15. Hunt, S. (2005). The Alpha program: Charismatic evangelism for the contemporary age. Pneuma, 27(1), 65–82. Scholar
  16. Kent, J. (1992). William Temple: Church, state and society in Britain, 1880–1950. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Kettell, S. (2012). Religion and the Big Society: A match made in heaven? Policy & Politics, 40(2), 281–296. Scholar
  18. Kuhrt, G. W. (Ed.). (2001). Ministry issues for the Church of England: Mapping the trends. London: Church House Publishing.Google Scholar
  19. Lay Ministries Working Group. (2017). Serving together: The report of the Lay Ministries Working Group 2015/16. London: Church of England.Google Scholar
  20. Li, Y., Savage, M., & Pickles, A. (2003). Social capital and social exclusion in England and Wales (1972–1999). The British Journal of Sociology, 54(4), 497–526. Scholar
  21. McCulloch, A. (2014). Cohort variations in the membership of voluntary associations in Great Britain, 1991–2007. Sociology, 48(1), 167–185. Scholar
  22. Mohan, J., & Bulloch, S. (2012). The idea of a ‘civic core’: What are the overlaps between charitable giving, volunteering, and civic participation in England and Wales (Vol. 75). Birmingham: Third Sector Research Centre.Google Scholar
  23. Paxton, P. (1999). Is social capital declining in the United States? A multiple indicator assessment. American Journal of Sociology, 105(1), 88–127. Scholar
  24. Powell, R. (2013). Trends in Protestant church vitality over twenty years (1991–2011) (Vol. NCLS Occasional Paper 23). Adelaide: Mirrabooka Press.Google Scholar
  25. Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  26. Richter, P., & Francis, L. J. (1998). Gone but not forgotten. London: Darton, Longman & Todd.Google Scholar
  27. Schwarz, C. A. (1996). Natural Church Development: A guide to the eight essential qualities of healthy churches. St. Charles, IL: ChurchSmart Resources.Google Scholar
  28. Smith, D. H. (1994). Determinants of voluntary association participation and volunteering. Non-profit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 23(3), 243–263. Scholar
  29. Spencer, S. (2015, August 14). Goals for growth expose a vision’s limitations. The Church Times, p. 10.Google Scholar
  30. Stolle, D., & Hooghe, M. (2004). Inaccurate, exceptional, one-sided or irrelevant? The debate about the alleged decline of social capital and civic engagement in western societies. British Journal of Political Science, 35(1), 149–167. Scholar
  31. Stott, J. (2007). The living church. Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press.Google Scholar
  32. Warren, R. (2004). The healthy churches’ handbook. London: Church House Publishing.Google Scholar
  33. Warren, R. (2012). Developing healthy churches: Returning to the heart of mission and ministry. London: Church House Publishing.Google Scholar
  34. Wilkinson, A. (1999). New Labour and Christian Socialism. In G. R. Taylor (Ed.), The impact of New Labour (pp. 37–49). London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
  35. Woolever, C., & Bruce, D. (2004). Beyond the ordinary: Ten strengths of U.S. congregations. Louisville, KY and London: Westminster John Knox Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.York St John UniversityYorkUK

Personalised recommendations