Advertisement

Conclusions

  • Andrew VillageEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

This book has reported on 28 items that were part of both the 2001 and 2013 Church Times surveys. The main chapters dealt with particular items related to the same topic and showed how the level of agreement with the item varied between different categories in groups defined by sex, age, education, location, ordination status and church tradition. This final chapter first looks at the results from a slightly different perspective by taking each of these groups in turn and asking what the results tell us about the nature of differences between categories in this group. For example, in general how much did men differ from women and was there a pattern in the direction of these differences? The chapter then looks at how far things changed between the two surveys and what the trajectory of change suggests for the Church of England over the next few decades.

References

  1. Archbishops’ Council. (2007). Celebrating diversity in the Church of England. London: Church of England.Google Scholar
  2. Beyerlein, K., & Hipp, J. R. (2005). Social capital, too much of a good thing? American religious traditions and community crime. Social Forces, 84(2), 995–1013.  https://doi.org/10.1353/sof.2006.0004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beyerlein, K., & Hipp, J. R. (2006). From pews to participation: The effect of congregation activity and context on bridging civic engagement. Social Problems, 53(1), 97–117.  https://doi.org/10.1525/sp.2006.53.1.97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Church Army’s Research Unit. (2013). An analysis of Fresh Expressions of Church and church plants begun in the period 1992–2012. Retrieved November 20, 2014, from http://www.churchgrowthresearch.org.uk/UserFiles/File/Reports/churchgrowthresearch_freshexpressions.pdf.
  5. Church of England. (1985). Faith in the city: A call for action by church and nation. London: Church House Publishing.Google Scholar
  6. Church of England. (1990). Faith in the Countryside. Worthing: Churchman Publishing.Google Scholar
  7. Church of England. (2006). Faithful cities: A call for celebration, vision and justice. Peterborough: Methodist Publishing House.Google Scholar
  8. Francis, L. J. (1997). The psychology of gender differences in religion: A review of empirical research. Religion, 27(1), 81–96.  https://doi.org/10.1006/reli.1996.0066.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Francis, L. J., & Robbins, M. (2012). Not fitting in and getting out: Psychological type and congregational satisfaction among Anglican churchgoers in England. Mental Health, Religion & Culture, 15(10), 1023–1035.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13674676.2012.676260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Francis, L. J., Robbins, M., & Astley, J. (2005). Fragmented faith? Exposing the fault-lines in the Church of England. Milton Keynes: Paternoster Press.Google Scholar
  11. Francis, L. J., & Wilcox, C. (1997). The relationship between Eysenck’s personality dimensions and Bem’s masculinity and femininity scales revisited. Personality and Individual Differences, 25(4), 683–687.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0191-8869(98)00085-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Graham, E. (2018). How to speak of God? Toward a postsecular apologetics. Practical Theology, 11(3), 206–217.  https://doi.org/10.1080/1756073x.2018.1460522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. House of Bishops. (1991). Issues in human sexuality: A statement by the House of Bishops of the General Synod of the Church of England. London: Church of England.Google Scholar
  14. House of Bishops. (1999). Marriage: A teaching document. London: Church of England.Google Scholar
  15. House of Bishops. (2003). Some issues in human sexuality: A guide to the debate. London: Church of England.Google Scholar
  16. Hunt, S. (2005a). The alpha course and its critics: An overview of the debates. PentecoStudies, 4(1), 1–22.Google Scholar
  17. Hunt, S. (2005b). The Alpha program: Charismatic evangelism for the contemporary age. Pneuma, 27(1), 65–82.  https://doi.org/10.1163/157007405774270329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jeffries, S. (2012, November 10). The sex issue: Is monogamy dead? The Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2012/nov/10/sex-is-monogamy-dead.
  19. Loewenthal, K. M., MacLeod, A. K., & Cinnirella, M. (2002). Are women more religious than men? Gender differences in religious activity among different religious groups in the UK. Personality and Individual Differences, 32(1), 133–139.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0191-8869(01)00011-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. ONS. (2012). 2011 census: Key statistics for local authorities in England and Wales. Retrieved July 31, 2018, from Office for National Statistics. https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/populationandmigration/populationestimates/datasets/2011censuskeystatisticsforlocalauthoritiesinenglandandwales.
  21. ONS. (2017). Graduates in the UK labour market: 2017. London: Office for National Statistics.Google Scholar
  22. Phelan, J., Link, B. G., Stueve, A., & Moore, R. E. (1995). Education, social liberalism, and economic conservatism: Attitudes toward homeless people. American Sociological Review, 60(1), 126–140.  https://doi.org/10.2307/2096349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Reimer, S. (2010). Higher education and theological liberalism: Revisiting the old issue. Sociology of Religion, 71(4), 393–408.  https://doi.org/10.1093/socrel/srq049.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Robbins, M. (2007). Clergymen and clergywomen: The same inclusive gospel? Journal of Beliefs & Values, 28(1), 55–64.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13617670701251561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Smith, D. H. (1994). Determinants of voluntary association participation and volunteering. Non-profit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 23(3), 243–263.  https://doi.org/10.1177/089976409402300305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Smith, A., & Hopkinson, J. (Eds.). (2012). Faith and the future of the countryside. Norwich: Canterbury Press.Google Scholar
  27. Trzebiatowska, M., & Bruce, S. (2014). Why are women more religious than men? Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Village, A. (2007a). The Bible and lay people: An empirical approach to ordinary hermeneutics. Aldershot and Burlington, VT: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  29. Village, A. (2007b). Feeling in and falling out: Sense of belonging and frequency of disagreeing among Anglican congregations. Archive for the Psychology of Religion, 29, 268–288.  https://doi.org/10.1163/008467207x188865.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Village, A. (2011). Factors predicting relationship with society among Anglicans in England. In L. J. Francis & H.-G. Ziebertz (Eds.), Public significance of religion (pp. 215–240). Leiden: Brill.  https://doi.org/10.1163/ej.9789004207066.i-495.82.
  31. Village, A. (2012). English Anglicanism: Construct validity of a scale of Anglo-catholic versus evangelical self-identification. In F.-V. Anthony & H.-G. Ziebertz (Eds.), Religious identity and national heritage: Empirical-theological perspectives (pp. 93–122). Leiden: Brill.  https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004228788_007.
  32. Village, A. (2013). Traditions within the Church of England and psychological type: A study among the clergy. Journal of Empirical Theology, 26(1), 22–44.  https://doi.org/10.1163/15709256-12341252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Village, A. (2015a). Nature or nurture? What makes people feel confident in faith? Rural Theology, 13(1), 82–93.  https://doi.org/10.1179/1470499415z.00000000043.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Village, A. (2015b). Was White right? Biblical interpretation, theological stance and environmental attitudes among a sample of UK churchgoers. Journal of Empirical Theology, 28(1), 1–26.  https://doi.org/10.1163/15709256-12341321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Village, A. (2015c). Who goes there? Attendance at Fresh Expressions of Church in relation to psychological type preferences among readers of the Church Times. Practical Theology, 8(2), 112–129.  https://doi.org/10.1179/1756074815y.0000000007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Village, A. (2016). Biblical conservatism and psychological type. Journal of Empirical Theology, 29(2), 137–159.  https://doi.org/10.1163/15709256-12341340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Village, A., & Baker, S. (2018). Rejecting Darwinian evolution: The effects of education, church tradition, and individual theological stance among UK churchgoers. Review of Religious Research.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13644-018-0335-8.
  38. Village, A., & Francis, L. J. (2008). Attitude toward homosexuality among Anglicans in England: The effects of theological orientation and personality. Journal of Empirical Theology, 21, 68–87.  https://doi.org/10.1163/092229308x310740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Village, A., & Francis, L. J. (2009). The mind of the Anglican clergy: Assessing attitudes and beliefs in the Church of England. Lampeter: Edwin Mellen Press.Google Scholar
  40. Village, A., & Francis, L. J. (2010). An anatomy of change: Profiling cohort-difference in beliefs and attitudes among Anglicans in England. Journal of Anglican Studies, 8(1), 59–81.  https://doi.org/10.1017/s1740355309990027.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.York St John UniversityYorkUK

Personalised recommendations