Advertisement

FlexSim Use in Didactics, Thesis, and Research in the Context of Competences for the Industry 4.0

  • Karolina Werner-LewandowskaEmail author
  • Agnieszka Grzelczak
  • Pawel Pawlewski
  • Monika Kosacka-Olejnik
Chapter
Part of the EcoProduction book series (ECOPROD)

Abstract

The aim of this chapter is to present the use of FlexSim software, which is predominantly used for simulation and optimization of business processes, in the area of scientific research and academic education at the level of diploma theses. The chapter consists of three parts. At first, competences for Industry 4.0 are introduced. Then, the use of FlexSim in the area of teaching, dissertations, and research is presented. Finally, there is demonstrated how the use of FlexSim software in the specified areas contributes to the development of competences for the Industry 4.0, named as C4I4.0.

Keywords

Simulation FlexSim Competences Industry 4.0 

References

  1. 1.
    Kagermann, H., Helbig, J., Hellinger, A., Wahlster, W.: Recommendations for Implementing the Strategic Initiative INDUSTRIE 4.0: Securing the Future of German Manufacturing Industry; Final Report of the Industrie 4.0 Working Group, Forschungsunion (2013)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Brettel, M., Friederichsen, N., Keller, M., Rosenberg, M.: How virtualization, decentralization and network building change the manufacturing landscape: an industry 4.0 perspective. Int. J. Mech. Ind. Sci. Eng. 8(1), 37–44 (2014)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Industrie 4.0—International Benchmark, Future Options and Recommendations for Production Research (INBENZHAP) (2016). http://www.acatech.de/fileadmin/user_upload/Baumstruktur_nach_Website/Acatech/root/de/Publikationen/Sonderpublikationen/INBENZHAP_E_web.pdf. Last accessed 31 May 2017
  4. 4.
    Meissner, H., Ilsen, R., Aurich, J.C.: Analysis of control architectures in the context of industry 4.0. Procedia CIRP 62, 165–169 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hermann, M., Pentek, T., Otto, B.: Design principles for industrie 4.0 scenarios. In: 49th Hawaii International Conference on Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), pp. 3928–3937. IEEEGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hofmann, E., Rüsch, M.: Industry 4.0 and the current status as well as future prospects on logistics. Comput. Ind. 89, 23–34 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jasiulewicz-Kaczmarek, M., Saniuk, A., Nowicki, T.: The maintenance management in the macro-ergonomics context. In: Goossens, R.H.M. (ed.) Advances in Social & Occupational Ergonomics Proceedings of the AHFE2016 Conference on Social & Occupational Ergonomics, July 27–31, Walt Disney World®, Florida, USA Series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol. 487, pp. 35–46 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41688-5Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wolfgang, D., Glohr, C., Hahn, T., Knafla, F., Loewen, U., Rosen, R., et al.: Umsetzungsstrategie Industrie 4.0—Ergebnisbericht der Plattform Industrie 4.0 (2015)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mrugalska, B., Wyrwicka, M.K.: Towards lean production in industry 4.0. Procedia Eng. 182, 466–473 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Schwab, K.: The Fourth Industrial Revolution. Penguin, UK (2017)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Pawelewski, P.: Using PFEP for simulation modeling of production systems. In: 28th International Conference on Flexible Automation and Intelligent Manufacturing (FAIM2018), June 11–14, 2018, Columbus, OH, USA (2018)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kagermann, H., Helbig, J., Hellinger, A., Wahlster, W.: Acatech, Fraunhofer Institut für Materialfluss und Logistik, equeo GmbH: Kompetenzentwicklungsstudie Industrie 4.0. Report (2016)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Engineers of Industry 4.0 Ready to change? (in polish), ASTOR (2016). http://www.astor.com.pl/images/Industry_4-0_Przemysl_4-0/ASTOR_Inzynierowie_4.0_whitepaper.pdf. Last accessed 26 May 2017
  14. 14.
    Korytkowski, P.: Competences-based performance model of multi-skilled workers with learning and forgetting. Expert Syst. Appl. 77, 226–235 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Loufrani-Fedida, S., Missonier, S.: The project manager cannot be a hero anymore! Understanding critical competencies in project-based organizations from a multilevel approach. Int. J. Project Manage. 33(6), 1220–1235 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Palšaitis, R., Čižiūnienė, K., Vaičiūtė, K.: Improvement of warehouse operations management by considering competencies of human resources. Procedia Eng. 187, 604–613 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hecklau, F., Galeitzke, M., Flachs, S., Kohl, H.: Holistic approach for human resource management in industry 4.0. Procedia CIRP 54, 1–6 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Industry 4.0: Study—European Parliament—Europa.eu. http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2016/570007/IPOL_STU(2016)570007_EN.pdf. Last accessed 26 May 2017
  19. 19.
    Prifti, L., Kniggeb, M., Kienegger, H., Krcmar, H.: A Competency Model for “Industrie 4.0” Employees; Improvement of Warehouse Operations Management by Considering Competencies of Human Resources (2017)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Boyatzis, R.E.: The Competent Manager: A Model for Effective Performance. Wiley, New York (1982)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Armstrong, M.: Human resource management (in polish). ABC Publishing House, Cracow (2000)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Whiddett, S., Hollyforde, S.: A Practical Guide to Competencies: How to Enhance Individual and Organizational Performance, CIPD, London (2003). ISBN 1-84398-012-6Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Bartram, D., Robertson, I.T., Callinan, M.: Introduction: a framework for examining organizational effectiveness. In: Robertson, I.T., Callninan, M., Bartram, D. (eds.) Organizational Effectiveness. The Role of Psychology, pp. 1–10. Wiley, Baffins Lane, Chicheser, UK (2002)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    ISO 9001: Quality Management Systems—Requirements. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland (2015)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Czarnik, S., Dobrzyńska, M., Górniak J. et al.: Bilans of the human resource capital in Poland (in polish) (2011). https://bkl.parp.gov.pl/pobierz.html/Bilans_Kapitalu_Ludzkiego_-_Raport_podsumowujacy.pdf. Last accessed 20 May 2017
  26. 26.
    Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). www.oecd.org/dataoecd/51/8/1913021.pdf. Last accessed 20 May 2017
  27. 27.
    Filipowicz, G.: Unkiversal competency model (in polish), Fundation of the Management Observatory, Catalyst for Innovation, Competency Insitiute, Warsaw (2011)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Grzelczak, A., Kosacka, M., Werner-Lewandowska, K.: Employees competences for industry 4.0 in Poland–preliminary research results. Destech Transactions on Engineering and Technology Research, (ICPR) (2017)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Grzelczak, A., Werner-Lewandowska, K., Kosacka, M.: Perspectives of industry 4.0 development in Poland–preliminary research results. Destech Transactions on Engineering and Technology Research, (ICPR) (2017)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Pawlewski, P., Pasek, Z.J.: Logistics engineering curriculum integrated through student projects. Res. Logistics Prod. 1(1), 27–44 (2011)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Werner-Lewandowska, K.: Methodology of logistics process improvement in a production enterprise in the knowledge transformation context, (in polish) (2015). Ph.D. Dissertation. http://repozytorium.put.poznan.pl/Content/352328/Karoli-na_Werner-wandowska_Metodyka_doskonalenia_procesu_logistycznego_w_przedsiebiorstwie_produkcyjnym,_w_aspekcie_transformacji_wiedzy.pdf. Last accessed 29 May 2018
  32. 32.
    Hoffa-Dąbrowska, P.: Methodology of modelling disturbances in logistics process (in polish). Ph.D. Dissertation, Poznan University of Technology. Last accessed 29 May 2018Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Karolina Werner-Lewandowska
    • 1
    Email author
  • Agnieszka Grzelczak
    • 1
  • Pawel Pawlewski
    • 1
  • Monika Kosacka-Olejnik
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Engineering ManagementPoznan University of TechnologyPoznanPoland

Personalised recommendations