Advertisement

Recent Trends in Nanomaterials for Sustainable Energy

  • D Durgalakshmi Email author
  • Rajendran Saravanan 
  • Mu. Naushad
Chapter
Part of the Environmental Chemistry for a Sustainable World book series (ECSW, volume 24)

Abstract

The consumption of energy in any form is inevitable in the present era, and is growing. Currently, most energy resources come from fossil fuels. However, the alarming situation of global warming has attracted increasing attention to the development of renewable energy resources. The future of energy is completely in the hands of green energy resources. Hydrogen fuel cells are one of the focus areas of green energy generation with zero emission. Energy storage must be low cost, be small in size, and have a higher storage capacity. Developments in the field of nanoscience and nanotechnology are creating a more reliable pathway toward energy generation and storage. The unique characteristic of nanomaterials can control the dimensionality of materials (e.g., zero-, one-, two-, and three-dimensional), morphology, and composite formation, through which the desired electrical, electronic, and storage properties of materials can be achieved. This chapter provides a brief outline of the current state of energy and recent developments in fuel cells, batteries, and supercapacitors with the aid of nanotechnology.

Keywords

Nanomaterials Energy Fuel cells Batteries Supercapacitors 

Notes

Acknowledgement

One of the authors, D. Durgalakshmi, gratefully acknowledges DST-INSPIRE Faculty Fellowship under the sanction DST/INSPIRE/04/2016/000845 for their funding. R. Saravanan gratefully acknowledges financial support from the SERC (CONICYT/FONDAP/15110019), FONDECYT, Government of Chile (Project No.: 11170414), and the School of Mechanical Engineering (EUDIM), Universidad de Tarapacá, Arica, Chile.

References

  1. Abe R (2010) Recent progress on photocatalytic and photoelectrochemical water splitting under visible light irradiation. J Photochem Photobiol C: Photochem Rev 11(4):179–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arico AS, Bruce P, Scrosati B, Tarascon J-M, Van Schalkwijk W (2011) Nanostructured materials for advanced energy conversion and storage devices. In: Materials for sustainable energy: a collection of peer-reviewed research and review articles from nature publishing group. World Scientific, Singapore, pp 148–159Google Scholar
  3. Bagotsky VS, Skundin AM, Volfkovich YM (2015) Electrochemical power sources: batteries, fuel cells, and supercapacitors. Wiley, HobokenGoogle Scholar
  4. Baker FS, Miller CE, Repik AJ, Tolles ED (1992) Activated carbon. In: Kirk-Othmer (ed) Encyclopedia of chemical technology. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  5. Bayer T, Bishop S, Nishihara M, Sasaki K, Lyth S (2014) Characterization of a graphene oxide membrane fuel cell. J Power Sources 272:239–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bowman WJ, Kelly MN, Rohrer GS, Hernandez CA, Crozier PA (2017) Enhanced ionic conductivity in electroceramics by nanoscale enrichment of grain boundaries with high solute concentration. Nanoscale 9(44):17293–17302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chen S, Xing W, Duan J, Hu X, Qiao SZ (2013) Nanostructured morphology control for efficient supercapacitor electrodes. J Mater Chem A 1(9):2941–2954CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cooney DO (1980) Activated charcoal: antidotal and other medical uses, vol 9. Marcel Dekker Incorporated, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  9. Dincer I, Acar C (2015) Review and evaluation of hydrogen production methods for better sustainability. Int J Hydrog Energy 40(34):11094–11111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dullien S (2010) The financial and economic crisis of 2008–2009 and developing countries. UN.Google Scholar
  11. Dunn B, Kamath H, Tarascon J-M (2011) Electrical energy storage for the grid: a battery of choices. Science 334(6058):928–935CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Eftekhari A, Fang B (2017) Electrochemical hydrogen storage: opportunities for fuel storage, batteries, fuel cells, and supercapacitors. Int J Hydrog Energy 42:25143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Etacheri V, Di Valentin C, Schneider J, Bahnemann D, Pillai SC (2015) Visible-light activation of TiO2 photocatalysts: advances in theory and experiments. J Photochem Photobiol C: Photochem Rev 25:1–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fan L, Zhu B, Su P-C, He C (2018) Nanomaterials and technologies for low temperature solid oxide fuel cells: recent advances, challenges and opportunities. Nano Energy 45:148–176.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoen.2017.12.044 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Forouzan MM, Wray M, Robertson L, Wheeler DR (2017) Tortuosity of composite porous electrodes with various conductive additives in an alkaline system. J Electrochem Soc 164(13):A3117–A3130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fujishima A, Honda K (1972) Electrochemical photolysis of water at a semiconductor electrode. Nature 238(5358):37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gao Y, Gao X, Zhang X (2017) The 2 C global temperature target and the evolution of the long-term goal of addressing climate change—from the United Nations framework convention on climate change to the Paris agreement. Engineering 3(2):272–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gokay B (2009) The 2008 world economic crisis: global shifts and faultlines. Centre for Research on Globalization 15 (1)Google Scholar
  19. Hadjipaschalis I, Poullikkas A, Efthimiou V (2009) Overview of current and future energy storage technologies for electric power applications. Renew Sust Energ Rev 13(6–7):1513–1522CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Harman PM, Harman PM (1982) Energy, force and matter: the conceptual development of nineteenth-century physics. Cambridge University Press, MelbourneCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hosseini SE, Wahid MA (2016) Hydrogen production from renewable and sustainable energy resources: promising green energy carrier for clean development. Renew Sust Energ Rev 57:850–866CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hwang B-U, Lee J-H, Trung TQ, Roh E, Kim D-I, Kim S-W, Lee N-E (2015) Transparent stretchable self-powered patchable sensor platform with ultrasensitive recognition of human activities. ACS Nano 9(9):8801–8810CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ismail AA, Bahnemann DW (2014) Photochemical splitting of water for hydrogen production by photocatalysis: a review. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells 128:85–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ji L, Meduri P, Agubra V, Xiao X, Alcoutlabi M (2016) Graphene-based nanocomposites for energy storage. Adv Energy Mater 6(16):1502159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Jian X, Liu S, Gao Y, Tian W, Jiang Z, Xiao X, Tang H, Yin L (2016) Carbon-based electrode materials for supercapacitor: progress, challenges and prospective solutions. J Electr Eng 4:75–87Google Scholar
  26. Jing D, Guo L, Zhao L, Zhang X, Liu H, Li M, Shen S, Liu G, Hu X, Zhang X (2010) Efficient solar hydrogen production by photocatalytic water splitting: from fundamental study to pilot demonstration. Int J Hydrog Energy 35(13):7087–7097CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Joh DW, Park JH, Kim D, Wachsman ED, Lee KT (2017) Functionally graded bismuth oxide/zirconia bilayer electrolytes for high-performance intermediate-temperature solid oxide fuel cells (IT-SOFCs). ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 9(10):8443–8449CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kannan R, Kakade BA, Pillai VK (2008) Polymer electrolyte fuel cells using Nafion-based composite membranes with functionalized carbon nanotubes. Angew Chem Int Ed 47(14):2653–2656CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ke Q, Wang J (2016) Graphene-based materials for supercapacitor electrodes—a review. J Mater 2(1):37–54Google Scholar
  30. Kötz R, Carlen M (2000) Principles and applications of electrochemical capacitors. Electrochim Acta 45(15–16):2483–2498CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lahiri K, Dey S, Panigrahi D (2002) Raghunathan a battery-driven system design: a new frontier in low power design. In: Proceedings of the 2002 Asia and South Pacific design automation conference. IEEE Computer Society, p 261Google Scholar
  32. Lee H, Cho MS, Kim IH, Do Nam J, Lee Y (2010) RuOx/polypyrrole nanocomposite electrode for electrochemical capacitors. Synth Met 160(9–10):1055–1059CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Li X (2018) Principles of fuel cells. CRC Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  34. Lincot D (2017) The new paradigm of photovoltaics: from powering satellites to powering humanity. Comptes Rendus Physique 18(7–8):381–390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Litzelman SJ, Hertz JL, Jung W, Tuller HL (2008) Opportunities and challenges in materials development for thin film solid oxide fuel cells. Fuel Cells 8(5):294–302.  https://doi.org/10.1002/fuce.200800034 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lokhande V, Lokhande A, Lokhande C, Kim JH, Ji T (2016) Supercapacitive composite metal oxide electrodes formed with carbon, metal oxides and conducting polymers. J Alloys Compd 682:381–403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lu W, Qu L, Henry K, Dai L (2009) High performance electrochemical capacitors from aligned carbon nanotube electrodes and ionic liquid electrolytes. J Power Sources 189(2):1270–1277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Maitra A, Das AK, Karan SK, Paria S, Bera R, Khatua BB (2017) A mesoporous high-performance supercapacitor electrode based on polypyrrole wrapped Iron oxide decorated nanostructured cobalt vanadium oxide hydrate with enhanced electrochemical capacitance. Ind Eng Chem Res 56(9):2444–2457.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.6b04449 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Martínez-Huerta M, Lázaro M (2017) Electrocatalysts for low temperature fuel cells. Catal Today 285:3–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Moreno NG, Molina MC, Gervasio D, Robles JFP (2015) Approaches to polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells (PEMFCs) and their cost. Renew Sust Energ Rev 52:897–906CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Ni M, Leung MKH, Leung DYC, Sumathy K (2007) A review and recent developments in photocatalytic water-splitting using TiO2 for hydrogen production. Renew Sust Energ Rev 11(3):401–425.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2005.01.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. O’hayre R, Cha S-W, Prinz FB, Colella W (2016) Fuel cell fundamentals. Wiley, HobokenCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Pandey RP, Shukla G, Manohar M, Shahi VK (2017) Graphene oxide based nanohybrid proton exchange membranes for fuel cell applications: an overview. Adv Colloid Interf Sci 240:15–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Park K-W, Ahn H-J, Sung Y-E (2002) All-solid-state supercapacitor using a Nafion® polymer membrane and its hybridization with a direct methanol fuel cell. J Power Sources 109(2):500–506CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Pergolesi D, Roddatis V, Fabbri E, Schneider CW, Lippert T, Traversa E, Kilner JA (2015) Probing the bulk ionic conductivity by thin film hetero-epitaxial engineering. Sci Technol Adv Mater 16(1):015001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Qu Y, Zhou W, Jiang L, Fu H (2013) Novel heterogeneous CdS nanoparticles/NiTiO 3 nanorods with enhanced visible-light-driven photocatalytic activity. RSC Adv 3(40):18305–18310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Quaschning V (2016) Understanding renewable energy systems. Routledge, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Saravanan R, Karthikeyan S, Gupta V, Sekaran G, Narayanan V, Stephen A (2013) Enhanced photocatalytic activity of ZnO/CuO nanocomposite for the degradation of textile dye on visible light illumination. Mater Sci Eng C 33(1):91–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Shaari N, Kamarudin S (2017) Graphene in electrocatalyst and proton conducting membrane in fuel cell applications: an overview. Renew Sust Energ Rev 69:862–870CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Sharaf OZ, Orhan MF (2014) An overview of fuel cell technology: fundamentals and applications. Renew Sust Energ Rev 32:810–853CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Sharma S, Ghoshal SK (2015) Hydrogen the future transportation fuel: from production to applications. Renew Sust Energ Rev 43:1151–1158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Smil V (2017) Energy: a beginner’s guide. Oneworld Publications, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  53. Stewart L (2009) Tungsten trioxide and titanium dioxide photocatalytic degradations of quinoline. Iowa State University, AmesCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Thomas JP, Qidwai MA (2005) The design and application of multifunctional structure-battery materials systems. JOM 57(3):18–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Tiwari JN, Tiwari RN, Kim KS (2012) Zero-dimensional, one-dimensional, two-dimensional and three-dimensional nanostructured materials for advanced electrochemical energy devices. Prog Mater Sci 57(4):724–803CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Wachsman ED, Marlowe CA, Lee KT (2012) Role of solid oxide fuel cells in a balanced energy strategy. Energy Environ Sci 5(2):5498–5509.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C1EE02445K CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Wang W, Guo S, Lee I, Ahmed K, Zhong J, Favors Z, Zaera F, Ozkan M, Ozkan CS (2014) Hydrous ruthenium oxide nanoparticles anchored to graphene and carbon nanotube hybrid foam for supercapacitors. Sci Rep 4:4452CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Wang Y, Guo J, Wang T, Shao J, Wang D, Yang Y-W (2015) Mesoporous transition metal oxides for supercapacitors. Nano 5(4):1667–1689Google Scholar
  59. Wei L, Yushin G (2012) Nanostructured activated carbons from natural precursors for electrical double layer capacitors. Nano Energy 1(4):552–565.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoen.2012.05.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Wei W, Cui X, Chen W, Ivey DG (2011) Manganese oxide-based materials as electrochemical supercapacitor electrodes. Chem Soc Rev 40(3):1697–1721CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. World Bank Group (2014) World development indicators 2014. World Bank Publications, Washington, DCCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Xu Z-L, Kim J-K, Kang K (2018) Carbon nanomaterials for advanced lithium sulfur batteries. Nano Today 19:84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Yang P, Mai W (2014) Flexible solid-state electrochemical supercapacitors. Nano Energy 8:274–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Yu Z, Duong B, Abbitt D, Thomas J (2013) Highly ordered MnO2 nanopillars for enhanced supercapacitor performance. Adv Mater 25(24):3302–3306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Yuan L, Lu X-H, Xiao X, Zhai T, Dai J, Zhang F, Hu B, Wang X, Gong L, Chen J (2011) Flexible solid-state supercapacitors based on carbon nanoparticles/MnO2 nanorods hybrid structure. ACS Nano 6(1):656–661CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Zhang Y-C, You Y, Xin S, Yin Y-X, Zhang J, Wang P, X-S Z, Cao F-F, Guo Y-G (2016) Rice husk-derived hierarchical silicon/nitrogen-doped carbon/carbon nanotube spheres as low-cost and high-capacity anodes for lithium-ion batteries. Nano Energy 25:120–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • D Durgalakshmi 
    • 1
    Email author
  • Rajendran Saravanan 
    • 2
  • Mu. Naushad
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Medical PhysicsAnna UniversityChennaiIndia
  2. 2.Faculty of Engineering, Department of Mechanical EngineeringUniversity of TarapacáAricaChile
  3. 3.Chemistry Department, College of ScienceKing Saud UniversityRiyadhSaudi Arabia

Personalised recommendations