Advertisement

An Intersectional Analysis of Capabilities, Conversion Factors and Aspirations

  • Faith Mkwananzi
Chapter

Abstract

The chapter demonstrates the interaction of capabilities and conversion factors and details how these two concepts relate to, and interact with, aspirations. The chapter also discusses the aspirations gap as well as the aspirations window and how it plays out for different individuals, thereby creating an awareness of what a complex analysis of aspirations and disadvantage can look like. Using intersectional analysis, Mkwananzi highlights the gendered aspect in aspirations formation, which marks the disparate values and aspirations between young men and women. Finally, the illustration of the role of agency in the interaction of capabilities and conversion factors provides an illustration of the complexity of aspirations formations in an environment with multiple factors.

References

  1. Ballet, J., Dubois, J. L., & Mahieu, F. R. (2007). Responsibility for Each Other’s Freedom: Agency as the Source of Collective Capability. Journal of Human Development, 8(2), 185–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bandura, A. (2001). Social Cognitive Theory: An Agentic Perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 1–26 (Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews Inc.).Google Scholar
  3. Beckert, J. (2010). How Do Fields Change? The Interrelations of Institutions, Networks, and Cognition in the Dynamics of Markets. Organization Studies, 31, 605–627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Biggeri, M., & Anich, R. (2009). The Deprivation of Street Children in Kampala: Can the Capability Approach and Participatory Methods Unlock a New Perspective in Research and Decision Making? Mondes en Développement, 37(146), 73–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Biggeri, M., & Libanora R. (2011). From Valuing to Evaluating: Tools and Procedures to Operationalize the Capability Approach. In M. Biggeri, J. Ballet, & F. Comim (Eds.), Children and the Capability Approach (pp. 79–106). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  6. Calitz, M. L. (2015). A Capabilities Approach to Student Experiences of Pedagogy, Power and Well-Being at a South African University (Unpublished PhD thesis). University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa.Google Scholar
  7. Camfield, L., Masae, A., McGregor, A., & Promphaking, B. (2012). Culture of Aspiration and Poverty? Aspirational Inequalities in Northeast and Southern Thailand (International Development Working Paper No. 38). Norwich: University of East Anglia. Google Scholar
  8. Chiappero-Martinetti, E., & Venkatapuram, S. (2014). The Capability Approach: A Framework for Population Studies. African Population Studies, 28(2), 708–720. http://dx.doi.org/10.11564/28-2-604.
  9. Chiappero-Martinetti, E., & von Jacobi, N. (2015). How Can Sen’s ‘Capabilities Approach’ Contribute to Understanding the Role for Social Innovations for the Marginalized? (CRESSI Working Papers No. 3/2015). Retrieved from https://www.sbs.ox.ac.uk/sites/default/files/research-projects/CRESSI/docs/CRESSI_Working_Paper_3_D1.1_Chp3_18Nov2014.pdf. Accessed 17 August 2018.
  10. Choo, H. Y., & Ferree, M. M. (2010). Practicing Intersectionality in Sociological Research: A Critical Analysis of Inclusions, Interactions and Institutions in the Study of Inequalities. Retrieved from http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1467-9558.2010.01370.x. Accessed 16 August 2018.
  11. Conradie, I., & Robeyns, I. (2013). Aspirations and Human Development Interventions. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 14(4), 559–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Crenshaw, K. W. (1995). Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics and Violence Against Women of Colour. In K. Crenshaw, N. Gotanda, G. Peller, & K. Thomas (Eds.), Critical Race Theory: The Key Writings That Formed the Movement (pp. 357–383). New York: The New Press.Google Scholar
  13. Crocker, D. (2008). Ethics of Global Development: Agency, Capability, and Deliberative Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Crush, J., Chikanda, A., & Tawodzera, G. (2015). The Third Wave: Mixed Migration from Zimbabwe to South Africa. Canadian Journal of African Studies, 49(2), 363–382.Google Scholar
  15. Genicot, G., & Ray, D. (2014). Aspirations and Inequality (National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper 1997). Retrieved from http://www.nber.org/papers/w19976.pdf. Accessed 9 June 2016.
  16. Hancock, A. (2007). When Multiplication Doesn’t Equal Quick Addition: Examining Intersectionality as a Research Paradigm. Perspectives on Politics, 5(1), 63–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hart, C. J. (2016). How Do Aspirations Matter? Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 17(3), 324–341.  https://doi.org/10.1080/19452829.2016.1199540.
  18. Heward, C. (1999). Introduction: The New Discourses of Gender, Education and Development. In C. Heward & S. Bunwaree (Eds.), Gender, Education and Development: Beyond Access to Empowerment (pp. 1–14). London and New York: Zed Books Ltd.Google Scholar
  19. Hill Collins, P., & Bilge, S. (2016). Intersectionality. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  20. Johnson, S. (2015). Capacities to Aspire and Capacities to Save: A Gendered Analysis of Motivations for Liquidity Management. Centre for Development Studies, University of Bath. Retrieved from https://purehost.bath.ac.uk/ws/portalfiles/portal/124551829/Johnson_Capacities_to_Aspire_June_2015.pdf. Accessed 17 August 2018.
  21. Katusiime, D. (2014). An Enhanced Human Development Capability Approach to Education: Implications for Technical Vocational Education and Training Policy in Uganda (Unpublished PhD thesis). Kent State University College. Retrieved from https://etd.ohiolink.edu/!etd.send_file?accession=kent1396530162&disposition=inline. Accessed 7 May 2018.
  22. Keogh, J., Garvis, S., Pendergast, D., & Diamond, P. (2012). Self-Determination: Using Agency, Efficacy and Resilience (AER) to Counter Novice Teachers Experiences of Intensification. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 37(8). Retrieved from http://ro.ecu.edu.au/ajte/vol37/iss8/4. Accessed 27 May 2016.
  23. Makina, D. (2012). Migration and Development: Issues and Some Lessons from Zimbabwe. In E. Masunungure & J. Shumba (Eds.), Zimbabwe Mired in Transition (pp. 174–204). Harare: Weaver Press. Google Scholar
  24. McCall, L. (2005). The Complexity of Intersectionality. Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 30, 1771–1800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Pasquier-Doumer, L., & Risso-Brandon, F. (2015). Aspiration Failure: A Poverty Trap for Indigenous Children in Peru? World Development, 72, 208–223. Retrieved from https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01291455. Accessed 6 September 2018.
  26. Pelenc, J., Lompo, M. K., Ballet, J., & Dubois, J. L. (2013). Sustainable Human Development and the Capability Approach: Integrating Environment, Responsibility and Collective Agency. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 14(1), 77–94.  https://doi.org/10.1080/19452829.2012.747491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Rao, V., & Walton, M. (2004). Introduction: Culture and Public Action. Stanford: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ray, D. (2006). Aspirations, Poverty, and Economic Change. In A. V. Banerjee, R. Benabo, & D. Mookherjee (Eds.), Understanding Poverty (pp. 409–421). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Robeyns, I. (2005). The Capability Approach: A Theoretical Survey. Journal of Human Development, 6(1), 93–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Sen, A. (1999). Development as Freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Walby, S. (2009). Globalization and Inequalities: Complexity and Contested Modernities. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  32. Walker, M., & Unterhalter, E. (2007). The Capability Approach: It’s Potential to Work in Education. In M. Walker & E. Unterhalter (Eds.), Amartya Sen’s Capability Approach and Social Justice in Education (pp. 1–18). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Watts, M. (2013). The Complexities of Adaptive Preferences in Post-compulsory Education: Insights from the Fable of the Fox and Grapes. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 14(4), 503–519.  https://doi.org/10.1080/19452829.2013.800847.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Wilson-Strydom, M. (2015). University Access and Theories of Social Justice: Contributions of the Capabilities Approach. Higher Education, 69(1), 143–155.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-014-9766-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Wilson-Strydom, M., Strydom, F., & Hen-Boisen, L. (2016). Institutional Research and the Student: The Promise of Mixed Methods and Intersectional Analysis. In J. Botha & N. J. Muller (Eds.), Institutional Research in South African Higher Education: Intersecting Contexts and Practices (pp. 255–276). Cape Town: Stellenbosch Sun Media.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Faith Mkwananzi
    • 1
  1. 1.Higher Education and Human Development Research GroupUniversity of the Free StateBloemfonteinSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations